Of counterfeits and delusions: Revisiting Ryle on skepticism and the impossibility of global deceit
By: Douglas McDermid
Abstract
Consider the following proposition: (Q) It is possible that all of our perceptual experiences are ‘delusive.’ According to Gilbert Ryle, (Q) is demonstrably absurd. In this paper I address four questions: (1) What is Ryle’s argument against (Q)?; (2) How persuasive is it?; (3) What positions are ruled out if (Q) is absurd?; and (4) How does Ryle’s position compare with contemporary work on skepticism?
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/disp-2004-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2182-2875 (formerly 0873-626X) | Journal ISSN: 0873-626X
Language: English
Page range: 42 - 64
Published on: Dec 31, 2018
Published by: University of Lisbon
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:
© 2018 Douglas McDermid, published by University of Lisbon
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.