Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Communicating and Acting Critically in the Climate Change Context in a High School Science Education Cover

Communicating and Acting Critically in the Climate Change Context in a High School Science Education

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. S. (2005). Research into STS science education. Educación Química, 16, 384–397. http://doi.org/10.22201/fq.18708404e.2005.3.66101
  2. Aikenhead, G. S. (2023). Humanistic school science: Research, policy, politics, and classrooms. Science Education, 107(2), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21774
  3. Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., & Cabrera Giraldez, M. (2022). GreenComp – European Competence Framework on Sustainability. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/13286
  4. BRASIL. (2018a). Min. da Educação/Conselho Nacional de Educação/Câmara de Educação Básica. [Ministry of Education/National Education Council/Chamber of Basic Education.]. Resolução CNE/CEB nº 3, 21/11/2018. Brasília.
  5. BRASIL. (2018b) Min. da Educação. Base Nacional Comum Curricular. [Common National Curriculum Base]. Brasília.
  6. BRASIL. (2018c) Min. da Educação/Gabinete do Ministro. [Ministry of Education/Minister’s Office.]. Portaria nº 1.432, 28/12/2018. Brasília.
  7. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualisation. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
  8. Fensham, P. J. (2022). The future curriculum for school science: What can be learnt from the past? Research in Science Education, 52, 81-102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10090-6
  9. Freire, P., Ramos, M. B., Macedo, D. P., & Shor, I. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed (50thanniversary edition). Bloomsbury Academic.
  10. Ghosh, A. (2016). The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. The University of Chicago Press.
  11. Heasly, B., Iliško, D., & Lindner, J. (2025). Editorial: Sustainable initiatives making significant impacts. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 16(1), 2025. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2025-0001
  12. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2023). Summary for policymakers. In H. Lee & J. Romero (Eds.), Climate Change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change (pp. 1–34). https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647.001
  13. Janney, B. A., Zummo, L., & Lohani, M. (2024). Shifting the desired outcome from climate literacy to climate agency: Education that empowers civic leaders. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 20(3), e2412. https://doi.org/10.29333/ijese/14657
  14. Kranz, J., Schwichow, M., & Breitenmoser, P., Niebert, K. (2002). The (Un) political perspective on climate change in education—A systematic review, Sustainability, 14, 4194. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074194
  15. Laudonia, I., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Abels, S., & Eilks, I. (2018). Action research in science education - An analytical review of the literature. Educational Action Research, 26(3), 480-495. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1358198
  16. Lesha, J. (2014). Action research in education. European Scientific Journal, 10(13), 379-386. Available at: http://eujournal.org/index.php/esj/article/viewFile/3363/3127
  17. Lindner, J. (2018). Entrepreneurship education for a sustainable future. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 9(1), 115-127. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2018-0009
  18. Lopez, F. S., & Mattos, C. R. (2024). Science education in the USA during the cold war: From neglect to a national security issue. Science & Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-024-00502-6
  19. Oberman, R., & Martínez Sainz, G. (2021). Critical thinking, critical pedagogy and climate change education. In Kavanagh, A. M., Waldron, F., & Mallon, B. (Eds.), Teaching for social justice and sustainable development across the primary curriculum (pp. 69–83). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003003021-5
  20. Perez, L. P., Rodrigues-Filho, S., Marengo, J. A., Santos, D. V., & Mikosz, L. (2020). Climate change and disasters: analysis of the Brazilian regional inequality. Sustainability in Debate, 11(3), 260–296. https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v11n3.2020.33813
  21. Rodrigues, A. M., Camillo, J., de Mattos, C. R. (2023). STEM and its roots and branches: Critical reflections from cultural-historical activity theory. In Plakitsi, K., Barma, S. (Eds.); Sociocultural approaches to STEM education. Sociocultural Explorations of Science Education, 21. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44377-0_
  22. Stetsenko, A. (2020). The transformative mind: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to development and education. Cambridge University Press.
  23. Strachan, G. (2018). Can education for sustainable development change entrepreneurship education to deliver a sustainable future? Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 9(1), 36-49. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2018-0003
  24. Strieder, R. (2012). STS Education: A critical and multicultural approach to science teaching. Ijuí: Unijuí.
  25. Strieder, R., Bravo Torija, B., & Gil Quílez, M. J. (2017). Ciencia-tecnología-sociedad: ¿Qué estamos haciendo en el ámbito de la investigación en educación en ciencias? [Science-technology-society: What are we doing in the field of science education research?] Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 35(3), 29–49. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Ensenanza/article/view/329206
  26. UNESCO. (2016). Incheon Declaration: Towards inclusive and equitable quality education and lifelong education for all. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243278_por
  27. UNESCO. (2017a). Climate change education for sustainable development. Paris: UNESCO.
  28. UNESCO. (2017b). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO.
  29. Van den Akker, J. (2010). Curriculum design research. In T. Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 37–52). Enschede: SLO. Available at: https://ris.utwente.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/14472302/Introduction_20to_20education_20design_20research.pdf
  30. Vianna, E., & Stetsenko, A. (2014). Research with a transformative activist agenda: Creating the future through education for social change. Teachers College Record, 116(14), 575–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811411601412
  31. Xiaomin, L.; Auld, E. (2020). A historical perspective on the OECD’s ‘humanitarian turn’: PISA for development and the learning framework 2030. Comparative Education, 56 (4), 503–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2020.1781397
  32. Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM Education: A deficit framework for the twenty-first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9578-z
  33. Zezzo, L. V., & Coltri, P. P. (2022). Educação em mudanças climáticas no contexto brasileiro: uma revisão integrada [Education on climate change in the Brazilian context: an integrated review]. Terrae Didática, 18(00), e022039. https://doi.org/10.20396/td.v18i00.8671305
Language: English
Page range: 135 - 153
Published on: Oct 10, 2025
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Mauritz Gregório de Vries, Cristiano Mattos, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.