Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sustainable Development Goals Communication Policy on Local Government Units through Four Discourses in Communication Research Cover

Sustainable Development Goals Communication Policy on Local Government Units through Four Discourses in Communication Research

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Ala-Uddin, M. (2019). ‘Sustainable’ discourse: A critical analysis of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 29(2), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X19881515
  2. Alcaraz-Quiles, F. J., Navarro-Galera, A., & Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. (2014). Factors influencing the transparency of sustainability information in regional governments: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 82, 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.086
  3. Alirezaei, E., Moradkhani, A., & Sojoodi, F. (2020). A comparative study of the theory of film realism and Jean Baudrillard’s hyperreality. Journal of Fine Arts: Performing Arts & Music, 25(4), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfadram.2021.306704.615453
  4. Amanuma, N., Onoda, S., & Olsen, S. H. (2025). Communication and stakeholder engagement in Japan’s SDG process: A focus on environmental aspects (pp. 36-50). In Multi-Stakeholder Contribution in Asian Environmental Communication, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032670508
  5. Bautista-Puig, N., Barreiro-Gen, M., Statulevičiūtė, G., Stančiauskas, V., Dikmener, G., Akylbekova, G., & Lozano, R. (2024). Unraveling public perceptions of the Sustainable development goals for better policy implementation. Science of The Total Environment, 9(12), 169114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169114
  6. Bariqoh, A., Sudikan, S. Y., & Surachni, E. (2018, July). Hyperreality in Surat Cinta Untuk Kartini’s Film (pp. 253-256). 2nd social sciences, humanities and education conference: Establishing Identities through Language, Culture, and Education (SOSHEC 2018), Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/soshec-18.2018.55
  7. Beatty, M. J. (2014). Thinking quantitatively. An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 44-53). Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/494muh2y
  8. Canina, M. R., Bruno, C., & Monestier, E. (2022). Futures thinking. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible (pp. 1-7). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_272-1
  9. Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7(2),191–207. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2634981
  10. Diaz-Bone, R., Bührmann, A. D., Gutiérrez Rodríguez, E., Schneider, W., Kendall, G., & Tirado, F. (2007). The field of Foucaultian discourse analysis: Structures, developments and perspectives. https://tinyurl.com/37yr9tbp
  11. Esposito, D., Zanin, G. M., Balena, P., & Monno, V. (2023, September). Achieving SDGs through public participation in spatial planning and urban governance: International standards for effective implementation. International Conference on Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning (pp. 396-407). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54118-6_36
  12. Franson, L. (2022). Communicating sustainability: An analysis of the 2017 United Nations sustainable development goals report. Toronto Metropolitan University. Thesis. https://doi.org/10.32920/ryerson.14655135.v1
  13. Gibbons, L. V. (2020). Regenerative - The new sustainable? Sustainability, 12(13), 5483. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135483
  14. Graham, L. J. (2005). Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault. In The Australian Association of Research in Education annual conference. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/2689/
  15. Hirst, J., & Spellman, C. (2024). The case for embedding futures thinking in university teaching & learning. Enhancing Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1. https://doi.org/10.62512/etlhe.1
  16. Gramsci, A., Smith, G. N., & Hoare, Q. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci Edited and Translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Navell Smith. Lawrence & Wishart. https://tinyurl.com/3u5r3uju
  17. Heasly, B., Iliško, D., & Lindner, J. (2025). Editorial: Sustainable initiatives making significant Impacts. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 16(1), 2025. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2025-0001
  18. Hofvenschioeld, E., & Khodadadi, M. (2020). Communication in futures studies: A discursive analysis of the literature. Futures, 115, 102493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102493
  19. Hook, D. (2001). Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history: Foucault and discourse analysis. Theory & psychology, 11(4), 521-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301114006
  20. Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six pillars: futures thinking for transforming. Foresight, 10(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680810855991
  21. Kurniasih, P., Sunarto, B., & Christomy, T. (2020, December). A new horizon of hyperreality. In 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020) (pp. 567-572). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.088
  22. Lacanilao, M. (2023, 29 Dec). A brief history of Escherain Stairwell [Video]. Youtube. Retrieved on April 29, 2025 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqyYiVAEf7o&t=1706s
  23. Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2009). Encyclopedia of communication theory. SAGE Publishing. https://tinyurl.com/ejuar4u4
  24. Melkote, S. R., & Steeves, H. L. (2015). Communication for development: Theory and practice for empowerment and social justice. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bgsu_books/5/
  25. Mefalopulos, P. (2008). Development communication sourcebook: Broadening the boundaries of communication (p. 42). World Bank Publications. https://tinyurl.com/ya92pbe5
  26. Mumby, D. K. (1997). Modernism, postmodernism, and communication studies: A rereading of an ongoing debate. Communication theory, 7(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00140.x
  27. Ozaki, Y., & Shaw, R. (2022). Citizens’ social participation to implement sustainable development goals (SDGs): A literature review. Sustainability, 14(21), 14471. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114471
  28. Ponce, R. G., & Villegas, J. P. (2022). Beyond sustainability: Positioning regenerative futures in a Philippine State University. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 13(2), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2022-0014
  29. Powers, P. (2007). The philosophical foundations of Foucaultian discourse analysis. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 1(2), 18-34. https://tinyurl.com/2mku6mby
  30. Putnam, L. L. (2001). Shifting voices, oppositional discourse, and new visions for communication studies. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02871.x
  31. Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I. & Ivanova, O. (2024). Editorial: Kaleidoscope of sustainable practices: Developing minds and shifting patterns. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 26(1), 2024. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2024-0001
  32. Sisto, R., García López, J., Quintanilla, A., de Juanes, Á., Mendoza, D., Lumbreras, J., & Mataix, C. (2020). Quantitative analysis of the impact of public policies on the sustainable development goals through budget allocation and indicators. Sustainability, 12(24), 10583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410583
  33. Spencer, G., Corbin, J. H., & Miedema, E. (2019). Sustainable development goals for health promotion: a critical frame analysis. Health Promotion International, 34(4), 847-858. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/day036
  34. Stacks, D. W., & Salwen, M. B. (2019). Integrating theory and research: Starting with questions. In Stacks, D. W., Salwen, M. B., & Eichhorn, K. C.(Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (3rd ed.), (pp. 3-14). doi: 10.4324/9780203710753
  35. Ştefănescu, L., Monika, M., & Alexandrescu, F. (2022). Efficient risk communication to strengthen the participation of local communities. In The achievement of sustainable development goals. A Case In The Apuseni Mountains, Romania. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 22,151-158. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s20.020
  36. Sulistyowati, F., Dibyorini, M. C. R., Tyas, B. H. S., & Puspitasari, C. (2023). Pseudoparticipation in sustainable development programs: A critical reflection on Indonesian local cases. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Media Pemikiran dan Dakwah Pembangunan [Journal of Community Empowerment: Media of Thought and Development Dawah], 7(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2023.071-05
  37. Szacki, J. (1966). Remarks on the Marxian concept of “false consciousness.” The Polish Sociological Bulletin, 14, 30–39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44815252
  38. Wauters, B., Haesevoets, T., Verschuere, B., Roets, A., Steyvers, K., Pittoors, G., &
  39. Van Severen, R. (2024). Closing a gap or creating a new one? Comparing support for participatory instruments among different stakeholders. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12739
  40. Weder F, Lemke S, Tungarat A. (2019). (Re)storying sustainability: The use of story cubes in narrative inquiries to understand individual perceptions of sustainability. Sustainability, 11(19), 5264. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195264
  41. White, S. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1),15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452961000157564
  42. Work, R. (2002). The role of participation and partnership in decentralised governance: A brief synthesis of policy lessons and recommendations of nine country case studies on service delivery for the poor. UNDP, New York. https://tinyurl.com/h4tzpcfe
  43. Wolny, R. W. (2017). Hyperreality and simulacrum: Jean Baudrillard and European postmodernism. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(3), 75-79. https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejis_v3_i3_17/Ryszard.pdf
  44. Villegas, J. P., & Ponce, R. G. (2024). Regenerative futures: Why and how to move forward as a Philippine State University? Davao Research Journal, 15(2), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v15iNo.2.169
Language: English
Page range: 110 - 118
Published on: Oct 10, 2025
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Mark Aljen D. Binocal, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.