Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Sustainable Development Goals Communication Policy on Local Government Units through Four Discourses in Communication Research

Open Access
|Oct 2025

References

  1. Ala-Uddin, M. (2019). ‘Sustainable’ discourse: A critical analysis of the 2030 Agenda for sustainable development. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 29(2), 214-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/1326365X19881515
  2. Alcaraz-Quiles, F. J., Navarro-Galera, A., & Ortiz-Rodríguez, D. (2014). Factors influencing the transparency of sustainability information in regional governments: An empirical study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 82, 179-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.086
  3. Alirezaei, E., Moradkhani, A., & Sojoodi, F. (2020). A comparative study of the theory of film realism and Jean Baudrillard’s hyperreality. Journal of Fine Arts: Performing Arts & Music, 25(4), 17-23. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfadram.2021.306704.615453
  4. Amanuma, N., Onoda, S., & Olsen, S. H. (2025). Communication and stakeholder engagement in Japan’s SDG process: A focus on environmental aspects (pp. 36-50). In Multi-Stakeholder Contribution in Asian Environmental Communication, Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032670508
  5. Bautista-Puig, N., Barreiro-Gen, M., Statulevičiūtė, G., Stančiauskas, V., Dikmener, G., Akylbekova, G., & Lozano, R. (2024). Unraveling public perceptions of the Sustainable development goals for better policy implementation. Science of The Total Environment, 9(12), 169114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169114
  6. Bariqoh, A., Sudikan, S. Y., & Surachni, E. (2018, July). Hyperreality in Surat Cinta Untuk Kartini’s Film (pp. 253-256). 2nd social sciences, humanities and education conference: Establishing Identities through Language, Culture, and Education (SOSHEC 2018), Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/soshec-18.2018.55
  7. Beatty, M. J. (2014). Thinking quantitatively. An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 44-53). Routledge. https://tinyurl.com/494muh2y
  8. Canina, M. R., Bruno, C., & Monestier, E. (2022). Futures thinking. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible (pp. 1-7). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_272-1
  9. Deetz, S. (1996). Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science, 7(2),191–207. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2634981
  10. Diaz-Bone, R., Bührmann, A. D., Gutiérrez Rodríguez, E., Schneider, W., Kendall, G., & Tirado, F. (2007). The field of Foucaultian discourse analysis: Structures, developments and perspectives. https://tinyurl.com/37yr9tbp
  11. Esposito, D., Zanin, G. M., Balena, P., & Monno, V. (2023, September). Achieving SDGs through public participation in spatial planning and urban governance: International standards for effective implementation. International Conference on Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning (pp. 396-407). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54118-6_36
  12. Franson, L. (2022). Communicating sustainability: An analysis of the 2017 United Nations sustainable development goals report. Toronto Metropolitan University. Thesis. https://doi.org/10.32920/ryerson.14655135.v1
  13. Gibbons, L. V. (2020). Regenerative - The new sustainable? Sustainability, 12(13), 5483. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135483
  14. Graham, L. J. (2005). Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault. In The Australian Association of Research in Education annual conference. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/2689/
  15. Hirst, J., & Spellman, C. (2024). The case for embedding futures thinking in university teaching & learning. Enhancing Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1. https://doi.org/10.62512/etlhe.1
  16. Gramsci, A., Smith, G. N., & Hoare, Q. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks of Antonio Gramsci Edited and Translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Navell Smith. Lawrence & Wishart. https://tinyurl.com/3u5r3uju
  17. Heasly, B., Iliško, D., & Lindner, J. (2025). Editorial: Sustainable initiatives making significant Impacts. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 16(1), 2025. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2025-0001
  18. Hofvenschioeld, E., & Khodadadi, M. (2020). Communication in futures studies: A discursive analysis of the literature. Futures, 115, 102493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102493
  19. Hook, D. (2001). Discourse, knowledge, materiality, history: Foucault and discourse analysis. Theory & psychology, 11(4), 521-547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354301114006
  20. Inayatullah, S. (2008). Six pillars: futures thinking for transforming. Foresight, 10(1), 4-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680810855991
  21. Kurniasih, P., Sunarto, B., & Christomy, T. (2020, December). A new horizon of hyperreality. In 4th International Conference on Language, Literature, Culture, and Education (ICOLLITE 2020) (pp. 567-572). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201215.088
  22. Lacanilao, M. (2023, 29 Dec). A brief history of Escherain Stairwell [Video]. Youtube. Retrieved on April 29, 2025 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqyYiVAEf7o&t=1706s
  23. Littlejohn, S. W., & Foss, K. A. (2009). Encyclopedia of communication theory. SAGE Publishing. https://tinyurl.com/ejuar4u4
  24. Melkote, S. R., & Steeves, H. L. (2015). Communication for development: Theory and practice for empowerment and social justice. https://scholarworks.bgsu.edu/bgsu_books/5/
  25. Mefalopulos, P. (2008). Development communication sourcebook: Broadening the boundaries of communication (p. 42). World Bank Publications. https://tinyurl.com/ya92pbe5
  26. Mumby, D. K. (1997). Modernism, postmodernism, and communication studies: A rereading of an ongoing debate. Communication theory, 7(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1997.tb00140.x
  27. Ozaki, Y., & Shaw, R. (2022). Citizens’ social participation to implement sustainable development goals (SDGs): A literature review. Sustainability, 14(21), 14471. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114471
  28. Ponce, R. G., & Villegas, J. P. (2022). Beyond sustainability: Positioning regenerative futures in a Philippine State University. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 13(2), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2022-0014
  29. Powers, P. (2007). The philosophical foundations of Foucaultian discourse analysis. Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines, 1(2), 18-34. https://tinyurl.com/2mku6mby
  30. Putnam, L. L. (2001). Shifting voices, oppositional discourse, and new visions for communication studies. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 38-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02871.x
  31. Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I. & Ivanova, O. (2024). Editorial: Kaleidoscope of sustainable practices: Developing minds and shifting patterns. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 26(1), 2024. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2024-0001
  32. Sisto, R., García López, J., Quintanilla, A., de Juanes, Á., Mendoza, D., Lumbreras, J., & Mataix, C. (2020). Quantitative analysis of the impact of public policies on the sustainable development goals through budget allocation and indicators. Sustainability, 12(24), 10583. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410583
  33. Spencer, G., Corbin, J. H., & Miedema, E. (2019). Sustainable development goals for health promotion: a critical frame analysis. Health Promotion International, 34(4), 847-858. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/day036
  34. Stacks, D. W., & Salwen, M. B. (2019). Integrating theory and research: Starting with questions. In Stacks, D. W., Salwen, M. B., & Eichhorn, K. C.(Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (3rd ed.), (pp. 3-14). doi: 10.4324/9780203710753
  35. Ştefănescu, L., Monika, M., & Alexandrescu, F. (2022). Efficient risk communication to strengthen the participation of local communities. In The achievement of sustainable development goals. A Case In The Apuseni Mountains, Romania. International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference: SGEM, 22,151-158. https://doi.org/10.5593/sgem2022/5.1/s20.020
  36. Sulistyowati, F., Dibyorini, M. C. R., Tyas, B. H. S., & Puspitasari, C. (2023). Pseudoparticipation in sustainable development programs: A critical reflection on Indonesian local cases. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Media Pemikiran dan Dakwah Pembangunan [Journal of Community Empowerment: Media of Thought and Development Dawah], 7(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2023.071-05
  37. Szacki, J. (1966). Remarks on the Marxian concept of “false consciousness.” The Polish Sociological Bulletin, 14, 30–39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44815252
  38. Wauters, B., Haesevoets, T., Verschuere, B., Roets, A., Steyvers, K., Pittoors, G., &
  39. Van Severen, R. (2024). Closing a gap or creating a new one? Comparing support for participatory instruments among different stakeholders. European Journal of Political Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12739
  40. Weder F, Lemke S, Tungarat A. (2019). (Re)storying sustainability: The use of story cubes in narrative inquiries to understand individual perceptions of sustainability. Sustainability, 11(19), 5264. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11195264
  41. White, S. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1),15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452961000157564
  42. Work, R. (2002). The role of participation and partnership in decentralised governance: A brief synthesis of policy lessons and recommendations of nine country case studies on service delivery for the poor. UNDP, New York. https://tinyurl.com/h4tzpcfe
  43. Wolny, R. W. (2017). Hyperreality and simulacrum: Jean Baudrillard and European postmodernism. European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3(3), 75-79. https://revistia.com/files/articles/ejis_v3_i3_17/Ryszard.pdf
  44. Villegas, J. P., & Ponce, R. G. (2024). Regenerative futures: Why and how to move forward as a Philippine State University? Davao Research Journal, 15(2), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v15iNo.2.169
Language: English
Page range: 110 - 118
Published on: Oct 10, 2025
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2025 Mark Aljen D. Binocal, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.