Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Views of Student Teachers at a University in Lesotho about their Digital Literacy and Online Safety: Building Sustainable Digital Practices Cover

Views of Student Teachers at a University in Lesotho about their Digital Literacy and Online Safety: Building Sustainable Digital Practices

Open Access
|Apr 2025

References

  1. Abdulbaki, K., Suhaimi, M., Alsaqqaf, A., & Jawad, W. (2018). The use of the discussion method at university: Enhancement of teaching and learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(6), 118-128. https://doi:10.5430/ijhe.v7n6p118
  2. Allison, K. (2018). Online risks, sexual behaviors, and mobile technology use in early adolescent children: parental awareness, protective practices, and mediation (Doctoral dissertation). https://scjholarcommns.se.edu/etd/4950
  3. Anastas, J. W. (2010). Teaching in social work an educator’s guide to theory and practice. New York: Columbia University. ISBN 978-0-231-115247
  4. Arafah, B. & Hasyim, M. (2022). Social media as a gateway to information: Digital literacy on current issues in social media. Webology, 19 (1), 2491 - 2503. https;//doi.org:10.14704/WEB/V19I1/WEB19167
  5. Barber, C., Sweetwood, S. O., & King, M. (2015). Creating classroom-level measures of citizenship education climate. Learning Environments Research, 18(2), 197–216.
  6. Benson, P., & Chik, A. (2010). New literacies and autonomy in foreign language learning. In M. J. Luzon, M. N. Ruiz, & M. L. Villanueva (Eds.), Digital genres, new literacies and autonomy in language learning (pp. 63-80). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  7. Brookfield, S. D. & Preskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. Jossey-Bass.
  8. Buchholz, B. A., DeHart, J., & Moorman, G. (2020). Digital citizenship during a global pandemic: moving beyond digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 64 (1) 11-17.
  9. Buckingham, D. (2007). Beyond technology: children’s learning in the age of digital culture. Polity Press.
  10. Campbell, D. E. (2008). Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior, 30(4), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9063-z.
  11. Cashin, W. E. (2011). Effective classroom discussions. IDEA Paper 49. https://ideacontent.blob.core.windows.net/content/sites/2/2020/01/IDEA_Paper_49.pdf
  12. Caro, D., & Schulz, W. (2012). Ten hypotheses about tolerance toward minorities among Latin American adolescents. Citizenship, Social and Economics Education, 11(3), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.2304/csee.2012.11.3.213.
  13. Carrasco, D. & Irribarra, D.T. (2018). The Role of classroom discussion. In Teaching Tolerance in a Globalized World, IEA Research for Education 4.
  14. Carvin, A. (2000) in Hossein B. (Ed). The Internet Encyclopedia. John Wiley & Sons.
  15. Castañeda, L. & Villar-Onrubia D. (2023). Beyond functionality: Building critical digital teaching competence among future primary education teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(1). ISSN: 1309-517X (Online).
  16. Cerf, V. G. (2016). Information and misinformation on the internet. Communications of the ACM, 60(1), 9-9
  17. Champagne, A. B., Klopper, L., Solomon, C., & Cahn, A. (1980). Interactions of students’ knowledge with their comprehension and design of science experiments. Pittsburgh Learning Research and Development Center.
  18. Chere-Masopha, J., & Mothetsi-Mothiba, L. (2022). Teachers’ experiences of using a portfolio for teaching, learning, and assessment in Lesotho primary schools. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1-13.
  19. Chiu, T. K. (2024). Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100197
  20. Driver, R. (1981). Pupils’ alternative frameworks in Science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(1), 93-101.
  21. Dunaway, M. K. (2011). Connectivism: Learning theory and pedagogical practice for the networked information landscapes. Reference Service Review, 39 (4), 675-685.
  22. Godfrey, E. B., & Grayman, J. K. (2014). Teaching citizens: The role of open classroom climate in fostering critical consciousness among youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(11), 1801–1817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-013-0084-5
  23. Heasly, B., Lindner, J., Iliško, Dz., & Salīte, I. (2020). Editorial. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(2), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.2478/dcse-2020-0014
  24. Henning, J. E. (2005). Leading discussion: opening up the conversation. College Teaching, 53(3), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.3200/CTCH.53.3.90-94
  25. Howard, J. R. & Weimer, M. (2015). Discussion in the college classroom: Getting your students engaged and participating in person and online. Jossey-Bass.
  26. ITEA/ITEEA, (2000/2002/2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology International Technology Education Association. https://www.iteea.org/42511.aspx
  27. Mahao, M. (2019). Teaching African literature and access to digital media and devices in Gauteng schools (PhD thesis). University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg: South Africa.
  28. Martin, A. (2006). European framework for digital literacy, 1(2), 151–161 https://doi.org/10.18261/ISSN1891-943X-2006-02-
  29. Naezer, M. (2018). From risky behaviour to sexy adventures: Reconceptualising young people’s online sexual activities. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 20(6) 715-729. https://doi.org:10.1080/13691058.2017.1372632
  30. Nguyen, P. A., Bokel, R., & van den Dobbelsteen, A. (2020). Sustainable design education-An evaluation of an international student design workshop in Hanoi, Vietnam. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(2), 20-32. https://doi.org:10.2478/dcse-2020-0016
  31. Patton, D. U., Leonard, P., Elaesser, C., Eschmann, R. D., Patel, S., & Crosby, S. (2019). What’s a threat on social media? How Black and Latino Chicago young men define and navigate threats online, Youth & Society, 51(6), 756-772.
  32. Payton, S. & Hague C. (2010) Digital literacy across the curriculum. https://www2.futurelab.org.uk/digital-literacy-across-the-curriculum
  33. Rodríguez-de-Dios, Van Oosten, & Igartua, J. (2018). A study of the relationship between parental mediation and adolescents’ digital skills, online risks and online opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 186-198.
  34. Rotenberg, R. (2010). The art and craft of college teaching: a guide for new professors and graduates. Routledge.
  35. Sanchez-Cruzado, C., Santiago Campion, R. & Sanchez-Compana, M. T. (2021). Teacher digital literacy: the indisputable challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(4), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041858
  36. Salīte, I., & Pipere, A. (2006). Aspects of sustainable development from the perspective of teachers. Journal of Teacher Education and Training, 6, 15-32.
  37. Shillair, R., Cotton, S. R., Tsai, H. S., Alhabash, S., LaRose, R., & Rifon, N. J. (2015). Online safety begins with you and me: Convincing internet users to protect themselves. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 199-207.
  38. Shiundu, A. (2019, September-October). A multi-tentacular problem. Development and Cooperation, 46, 10-11.
  39. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 1-9. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
  40. Singh, R. D. (2018). Mapping online child safety in Asia and the Pacific. Asia Pacific Policy Studies, 5(3), 651-664. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.247
  41. Sybing, R. (2015). Considerations for discussion activities for beginner EFL learners. Journal of the Nanzan Academic Society, 30(98), 163-169.
  42. Tapscott, D. (1988). Growing up digital: the rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill.
  43. Thinyane, H. (2010). Are digital natives a world-wide phenomenon? An investigation into South African first year students’ use and experience with technology, Computers & Education, 55, 406-414.
  44. Tilbergien, A. (1979). Modes and Conditions of learning an example: the learning of aspects of the new concepts of heat, in Archenhold (Ed.), Cognitive Development in Research in Science and Mathematics. University of Leeds.
  45. Tomczyk, L. (2018). Digital competences of parents in the matter of electronic threats. SHS Web of Conferences, 48. https://doi.org/10.1051/shconf/20184801004.
  46. Traynor, D. (2018). A tale unfolds: Digital media and developing literacy in English. Teaching English – The Magazine of the National Association for the Teaching of English, 17, 41-43.
  47. UNESCO. (2023). Information Literacy. https://www.unesco.org/en/ifap/information-literacy.
  48. UNESCO. (2014). Roadmap for implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. UNESCO.
  49. Van Deursen A.J. & Van Dijk J.A. (2019). The first-level of digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access, New Media & Society, 21 (2), 354-375.
  50. Van Zalk, N. & Van Zalk, M. (2020). Early adolescent disclosure and parental knowledge regarding online activities: social anxiety and parental rule-setting as moderators. Current Psychol, 39, 287-298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9750-1
  51. Whitehead, B. M., Jensen, D. F. N., & Boschee, F. (2013). Planning for technology: a guide for school administrators, technology coordinators, and curriculum leaders. Corwin.
Language: English
Page range: 150 - 165
Published on: Apr 19, 2025
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Mahao Mahao, Julia Chere-Masopha, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.