Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Attitudes and Evaluations of the Teachers Towards Distance Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic Cover

Attitudes and Evaluations of the Teachers Towards Distance Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic

By: Pinar Erten  
Open Access
|Jun 2022

References

  1. Ağır, F. (2007). Özel okullarda ve devlet okullarında çalışan ilköğretim öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitime karşı tutumlarının belirlenmesi [Determining the teachers’ attitudes towards distance education in public primary school and private primary school]. (Unpublished master thesis). Balıkesir University Institute of Science Department, Balıkesir.
  2. Ağır, F., Gür, H., & Okçu, A. (2007). Uzaktan eğitime karşı tutum ölçeği geliştirmesine yönelik geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması [Development of the attitude scale toward distance learning: Reliability and validity]. E-journal of New World Sciences Academy, 3(2), 128–139.
  3. Alea, L. A., Fabrea, M. F., Roldan, R. D. A., & Farooqi, A. Z. (2020). Teachers’ Covid-19 awareness, distance learning education experiences and perceptions towards institutional readiness and challenges. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(6), 127–144. doi: https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.6.810.26803/ijlter.19.6.8
  4. Alharthi, M. A. (2021). The effectiveness of virtual classrooms as an alternative to traditional classrooms during the Covid-19 pandemic: Problems and solutions. Life Science Journal, 18(5), 24–32.
  5. Alkan, C. (1981). Açık üniversite [Open university]. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 14(1), 339–351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_000000073810.1501/Egifak_0000000738
  6. Alkan, C. (1987). Açık öğretim: Uzaktan eğitim sistemlerinin karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi [Open education: A comparative study of distance education systems]. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Yayınları, Yayın No: 157.
  7. Alshammari, S. H. (2021). Determining the factors that affect the use of virtual classrooms: A modification of the UTAUT Model. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 20, 117–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.28945/470910.28945/4709
  8. Arslan, Y., & Şumuer, E. (2020). COVID-19 döneminde sanal sınıflarda öğretmenlerin karşılaştıkları sınıf yönetimi sorunları [Classroom management problems encountered by teachers in virtual classes during COVID-19 pandemic]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi [Journal of National Education], 49(1), 201–230. doi: 10.37669/milliegitim.79145310.37669/milliegitim.791453
  9. Aslantaş, T. (2014). Uzaktan eğitim, uzaktan eğitim teknolojileri ve Türkiye’de bir uygulama [Distance education, distance learning technologies and applications in Turkey]. https://www.tankutaslantas.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Uzaktan-E%C4%9Fitim-Uzaktan-E%C4%9Fitim-Teknolojileri-ve-T%C3%BCrkiyede-bir-Uygulama.pdf
  10. Baki, A., & Gökçek, T. (2012). Karma yöntem araştırmalarına genel bir bakış [A general overview of mixed method research]. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 11(42), 1–21.
  11. Basom, M., & Sherritt, C. (1992). Higher education problems in the twenty-first century: A survey of higher education administrators and politicians. Paper presented at the Annual Conference for International Higher Education Administrators. Nice, France.
  12. Bourke, J., & Simpson, O. (2009). Sustainability in education: Is distance learning an answer? Lower Hutt, New Zealand: The Open Polytechnic of New Zealand. https://repository.openpolytechnic.ac.nz/bitstream/handle/11072/1434/Bourke_Simpson_2009%20-%20Working%20Papers%20-%20WP_09_2.pdf?sequence=1
  13. Can, A. (2016). SPSS ile bilimsel araştırma sürecinde nicel veri analizi [Quantitative data analysis in the scientific research process with SPSS] (4th Ed.). Pegem Akademi Publishing.
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative. and mixed methods approaches (3rd Ed.). SAGE Publications.
  15. Çoklar, A. N., & Kabakçi Yurdakul, I. (2017). Technology integration experiences of teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(1), 19–31.10.1515/dcse-2017-0002
  16. Ergin, C. (2010). İköğretim öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitime bakış açıları (Van il örneği) [Perspectives of primary teachers on distance education]. (Unpublished master thesis). Yüzüncü Yıl University Institute of Social Sciences, Van.
  17. Erol Düzbastılar, M., & Özel, B. (2021). Online (çevrimiçi) müzik eğitiminde karşılaşılan sorunlar ve çözüm önerilerine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri [Teachers’ views on the problems and solutions in online music education]. In M. Eraslan, & A. Döngel (Eds.), Eğitim Bilimleri Teori, Güncel Araştırmalar ve Yeni Eğilimler/2021 [Educational sciences theory, current studies and new trends/2021] (pp. 102–115). Cetinje-Montenegro: IVPE.
  18. Erten, P. (2019a). Dijital bölünme [Digital divide]. International Journal of Education Science and Technology, 5(1), 15–23.
  19. Erten, P. (2019b). Opinions of preservice information technologies teachers on virtual classroom and implementations. Batman University Journal of Life Sciences, 9(2), 236–252.
  20. FATİH Project. (2021). FATİH Project: Movement of enhancing opportunities and improving technology. The Ministry of National Education of Republic of Turkey, The Directorate General of Innovation and Educational Technologies. http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/en/index.html
  21. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th Ed.). New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
  22. Görgülü-Arı A., & Hayır-Kanat, M. (2020). COVID-19 (Koronavirüs) üzerine öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri [Prospective teacher’ views on Covid-19 (Coronavirus)]. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi [Van Yüzüncü Yıl University the Journal of Social Sciences Institute] (Outbreak Diseases Special Issue), 459–492.
  23. Heasly, B., Iliško, D., Salīte, I., & Lindner, J. (2020). The value of process and pedagogy through the sustainability prism. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 11(2), 1–4.10.2478/dcse-2020-0014
  24. Hermanto, Y. B., & Srimulyani, V. A. (2021). The challenges of online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran [Journal of Education and Teaching], 54(1), 46–57.10.23887/jpp.v54i1.29703
  25. Horzum, M. B., Albayrak, E., & Ayvaz, A. (2012). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin hizmet içi eğitimde uzaktan eğitime yönelik inançları [Elementary classroom teachers’ beliefs on in-service training via distance education]. Ege Eğitim Dergisi [Ege Journal of Education], 13(1), 56–72.
  26. IEP-UNESCO. (2020, April 7). What price will education pay for COVID-19? http://www.iiep.unesco.org/en/what-price-will-education-pay-covid-19-13366
  27. İşman, A. (2011). Uzaktan eğitim [Distance education] (Extended 4. Ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.
  28. Karip, E. (2020, April 20). COVİD-19: Okulların kapatılması ve sonrası [COVID-19: School closures and beyond]. Ankara: TEDMEM. https://tedmem.org/vurus/covid-19-okullarin-kapatilmasi-ve-sonrasi#note-3322-4
  29. Kocayiğit, A., & Uşun, S. (2020). Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı okullarda görev yapan öğretmenlerin uzaktan eğitime yönelik tutumları (Burdur İli Örneği) [Attitudes of teachers working in schools affiliated to Ministry of National Education towards distance education (Example of Burdur province)]. Avrasya Uluslararası Araştırmalar Dergisi [International Journal of Euroasian Research], 8(23), 285–299.10.33692/avrasyad.662503
  30. Kurnaz, A., Kaynar, H., Şentürk Barışık, C., & Doğrukök, B. (2020). Öğretmenlerin uzaktan eğitime ilişkin görüşleri [Teachers’ views on distance learning]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi [Journal of National Education] (Special Issue), 49(1), 293–322. doi: 10.37669/milliegitim.78795910.37669/milliegitim.787959
  31. Maden, H. (2021). Uzaktan eğitim sürecinde işlenen derslere yönelik okul yöneticileri ve öğretmen görüşleri [Opinions of school administrators and teachers about the lessons taught in the distance education process] (Unpublished non-thesis master’s project). Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Denizli.
  32. Metin, M., Emlik, H., Gürlek, E. H., & Demirbaş, S. (2021). Uzaktan eğitime yönelik öğretmen görüşlerinin farklı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [The investigating of teachers’ views about distance education applications in terms of different variables]. Studies in Educational Research and Development, 5(1), 19–47.
  33. Ministry of National Education (MEB). (2021). Turkey’s education vision 2023. https://2023vizyonu.meb.gov.tr/doc/2023_VIZYON_ENG.pdf
  34. Ministry of National Education Strategy Development Presidency. (2019). Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı 2019–2023 stratejik planı [2019–2023 strategic plan of the Ministry of National Education]. http://sgb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2019_12/31105532_Milli_EYitim_BakanlYYY_2019-2023_Stratejik_PlanY__31.12.pdf
  35. Ministry of National Education Strategy Development Presidency. (2020). Millî Eğitim istatistikleri: Örgün eğitim 2019/’20 [National Education statistics: Formal education 2019/’20]. Ankara: Ministry of National Education Publications.
  36. Moçoşoğlu, B., & Kaya, A. (2020). Koronavirüs hastalığı (COVID-19) sebebiyle uygulanan uzaktan eğitime yönelik öğretmen tutumlarının incelenmesi [Investigation of teachers’ attitudes towards distance education applied due to coronavirus disease (COVID-19)]. Kahramanmaraş Sutcu Imam University Journal of Education, 2(1), 15–43.
  37. Mulenga, E. M., & Marbán, J. M. (2020). Is COVID-19 the gateway for digital learning in mathematics education? Contemporary Educational Technology, 12(2), ep269. doi: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/794910.30935/cedtech/7949
  38. Mustakim, M., Trisnaningsih, T., & Adha, M. M. (2021). The effectiveness of online collaborative learning during Covid-19 pandemic. Proceedings of the 4th Sriwijaya University Learning and Education International Conference (SULE-IC 2020). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research Series, 513, 256–262. Atlantis Press.10.2991/assehr.k.201230.115
  39. Özdoğan, A., & Berkant, H. (2020). COVID-19 pandemi dönemindeki uzaktan eğitime ilişkin paydaş görüşlerinin incelenmesi [The examination of stakeholders’ opinions on distance education during the COVID-19 epidemic]. Milli Eğitim Dergisi [Journal of National Education] (Special Issue), 49(1), 13–43. doi: 10.37669/milliegitim. 78811810.37669/milliegitim.788118
  40. Ozen, R. (2008). Inservice training (inset) programs via distance education: Primary school teachers’ opinions. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 9(1), 217–232.
  41. Perienen, A. (2020). Frameworks for ICT integration in mathematics education – a teacher’s perspective. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1845. doi: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/780310.29333/ejmste/7803
  42. Salīte, I. (2016). Searching for sustainability in teacher education and educational research: Experiences from the Baltic and Black Sea Circle Consortium for educational research. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 6(1), 21–29.10.1515/dcse-2015-0002
  43. Şenel, S., & Kutlu, Ö. (2015). Ankara Üniversitesi uzaktan eğitim programına katılan öğrencilerin akademik başarılarını yordayan faktörler [The factors predicting academic achievement of Ankara University distance education students]. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi [Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology], 6(2), 177–193.10.21031/epod.87414
  44. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. doi: 10.1177/234567890629243010.1177/2345678906292430
  45. TEDMEM. (2021). 2020 Eğitim değerlendirme raporu [2020 Education evaluation report]. (TEDMEM Değerlendirme Dizisi 7) [TEDMEM Evaluation Series 7]. Ankara: Türk Eğitim Derneği.
  46. UNESCO. (2021). COVID-19 impacts youth voices and hampers participation. https://en.unesco.org/news/covid-19-impacts-youth-voices-and-hampers-participation
  47. UNESCO, UNICEF, & World Bank. (2020). What have we learnt?: Overview of findings from a survey of ministries of education on national responses to COVID-19. UNESCO, UNICEF, World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/34700
  48. United Nations (UN). (2022). Quality Education: Goal 4 Targets. United Nations Turkey. https://turkey.un.org/en/sdgs/4
  49. Ülkü, S. (2018). İlkokullarda görev yapan öğretmenlerin uzaktan eğitime yönelik tutumları [Attitudes of primary school teachers’ distance education] (Unpublished master thesis). Abant İzzet Baysal University Department of Educational Sciences, Bolu.
  50. Valentine, D. (2002). Distance learning: Promises, problems, and possibilities. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 5(3). https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall53/valentine53.html
  51. World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Turkey’s response to COVID-19: First impressions. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe. Document number: WHO/EURO:2020-1168-40914-55408. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/335803/WHO-EURO-2020-1168-40914-55408-eng.pdf
  52. Yahşi, Ö., & Kırkıç, K. A. (2020). Uzaktan eğitim sürecinde öğretmenlerin uzaktan eğitime yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi [Analysis of teachers’ attitudes towards distance education in the distance education process]. Turkish Studies-Education, 15(5), 3827–3847. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.47423/TurkishStudies.4613610.47423/TurkishStudies.46136
  53. Yazıcıoğlu, Y., & Erdoğan, S. (2014). SPSS Uygulamalı Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri [SPSS applied scientific research methods] (4th Ed.). Ankara: Detay Publishing.
Language: English
Page range: 112 - 144
Published on: Jun 14, 2022
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Pinar Erten, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.