Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sustainable Instrument Development in Educational Research Cover

References

  1. Aka, K. A. (2019, October). Integration Borg & Gall (1983) and Lee & Owen (2004) models as an alternative model of design-based research of interactive multimedia in elementary school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1318(1), 012022, IOP Publishing.10.1088/1742-6596/1318/1/012022
  2. Anastasi, A. (1992). What counselors should know about the use and interpretation of psychological tests. Journal of Counseling & Development, 70(5), 610–615.10.1002/j.1556-6676.1992.tb01670.x
  3. Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria instrumen dalam suatu penelitian. Jurnal Theorems [The original research of mathematics], 2(1), 28–36.
  4. Borg, W. R., & Gall, M., D. (1983). Educational Research. An Introduction. Longman Inc.
  5. Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
  6. Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1991). Reliability and validity assessment. Sage.
  7. Cullen, J. P., Gregory, J. L., & Noto, L. A. (2010). The teacher attitudes toward inclusion scale (TATIS) Technical Report. Online Submission.
  8. Depdiknas. (2008). Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar [Development Guide Book of Learning Meterial Development]. Jakatra: Ministry of National Education Directorate General of Primary and Secondary Education Management.
  9. DeVellis, R. F. (2003). Scale development: Theory and applications (2nd Ed.). Sage.
  10. Dick, W., Carey, L. M., & Carey, J. O. (2001). The Systematic Design of Instruction (6th Ed.). Pearson.
  11. Ediyanto. (2020). The development of an instrument to measure Indonesian teachersí attitudes toward inclusive education. Hiroshima University, Japan. https://ir.lib.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/00049557
  12. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (4th Ed.). London: Sage.
  13. Fink, A. (1995). How to measure survey reliability and validity, 7. Sage.
  14. Forlin, C., Earle, C., Loreman, T., & Sharma, U. (2011). The sentiments, attitudes, and concerns about inclusive education revised (SACIE-R) scale for measuring pre-service teachersí perceptions about inclusion. Exceptionality Education International, 21(3), 50–65.10.5206/eei.v21i3.7682
  15. Gregory, J. L., & Noto, L. A. (2012). Technical manual for attitudes towards teaching all students (ATTAS-mm) instrument. Online Submission.
  16. Gronlund, S. D., Carlson, C. A., Dailey, S. B., & Goodsell, C. A. (2009). Robustness of the sequential lineup advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(2), 140–152.10.1037/a0015082
  17. Mahat, M. (2008). The development of a psychometrically-sound instrument to measure teachers’ multidimensional attitudes toward inclusive education. International Journal of Special Education, 23(1), 82–92.
  18. Monsen, J. J., Ewing, D. L., & Boyle, J. (2015). Psychometric properties of the revised teachersí attitude toward inclusion scale. International Journal of School & Educational Psychology, 3(1), 64–71.10.1080/21683603.2014.938383
  19. Munawaroh, I. (2015). Urgensi Penelitian dan Pengembangan. Studi Ilmiah UKM Penelitian.
  20. Pipere, A., Reunamo, J., & Jones, M. (2010). Perceptions of research in education for sustainable development: An international perspective. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 1(2), 5–24.10.2478/dcse-2013-0011
  21. Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 23–38.10.1007/BF02961473
  22. Rounds, J. B., Dawis, R., & Lofquist, L. H. (1987). Measurement of person-environment fit and prediction of satisfaction in the theory of work adjustment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31(3), 297–318.10.1016/0001-8791(87)90045-5
  23. Salīte, I., Fjodorova, I., Iliško, I., Ivanova, O., & Meihami, H. (2020). JTES for sustainable development: An action research environment for the development and sustainable future of the journal identity. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-000110.2478/jtes-2020-0001
  24. Setyosari, P. (2013). Ranah Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran [Cognitive domain in learning]. Unmal.
  25. Sharma, U., & Desai, I. (2002). Measuring concerns about integrated education in India. Asia & Pacific Journal on Disability, 5(1), 2–14.
  26. Stoiber, K. C., Gettinger, M., & Goetz, D. (1998). Exploring factors influencing parents’ and early childhood practitioners’ beliefs about inclusion. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(1), 107–124.10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80028-3
  27. Van den Akker, J., Branch, R. M., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2012). Design approaches and tools in education and training. Springer Science & Business Media.
  28. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.
  29. Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838.10.1177/0011000006288127
Language: English
Page range: 37 - 47
Published on: Jun 14, 2022
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 Ediyanto Ediyanto, Asep Sunandar, Risa Safira Ramadhani, Thalsa Syahda Aqilah, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.