Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Establishing a Community of Discourse Through Social Norms Cover

Establishing a Community of Discourse Through Social Norms

Open Access
|May 2018

References

  1. Abreu, G., & Cline, T. (2003). Schooled mathematics and cultural knowledge. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 11(1), 11–30.10.1080/14681360300200158
  2. Aydin, S. (2016). Using Excel in teacher education for sustainability. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(20), 89–104. doi: 10.1515/jtes-2016-0017.10.1515/jtes-2016-0017
  3. Bennett, C. A. (2013). Teachers’ perspectives of whole-class discourse: Focusing on effective instruction to improve student learning. Action in Teacher Education, 35(5-6), 475–488. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2013.846765.10.1080/01626620.2013.846765
  4. Bratti, M., Checchi, D., & Filippin, A. (2011). Should you compete or cooperate with your schoolmates? Education Economics, 19(3), 275–289. doi: 10.1080/09645292.2011.585021.10.1080/09645292.2011.585021
  5. Briede, L. (2016). The relationship between mathematics teachers’ teaching approaches and 9th grade students’ mathematical self. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 34–47. doi: 10.1515/jtes-2016-0003.10.1515/jtes-2016-0003
  6. Brooks, J., & Brooks, M. (1993). The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  7. Clark, P. G., Moore, K. C., & Carlson, M. P. (2008). Documenting the emergence of “speaking with meaning” as a sociomathematical norm in professional learning community discourse. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 27(4), 297–310.10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.01.001
  8. Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3–4), 175–190. doi: 10.1080/00461520.1996.9653265.10.1080/00461520.1996.9653265
  9. Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1991). Analogies from the philosophy and sociology of science for understanding classroom life. Science education, 75(1), 23–44. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730750104.10.1002/sce.3730750104
  10. Depaepe, F., De Corte, E., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). Unraveling the culture of the mathematics classroom: A video-based study in sixth grade. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(5), 266–279. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2007.10.008.10.1016/j.ijer.2007.10.008
  11. Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanis, M., & van Oers, B. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education, Educational Research Review, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.002.10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.002
  12. Engle, R. A., & Conant, F. C. (2002). Guiding principles for fostering productive disciplinary engagement: Explaining an emergent argument in a community of learners’ classroom. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 399–483. doi: 10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1.10.1207/S1532690XCI2004_1
  13. Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2007). How students learn statistics revisited: A current review of research on teaching and learning statistics. International Statistical Review, 75(3), 372–396. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00029.x.10.1111/j.1751-5823.2007.00029.x
  14. Gedžūne, G. (2015). Awakening pre-service teachers to children’s social exclusion in the classroom. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 6(1), 95–109. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2015-0007.10.1515/dcse-2015-0007
  15. González, G., & DeJarnette, A. F. (2015). Teachers’ and students’ negotiation moves when teachers scaffold group work. Cognition and Instruction, 33(1), 1–45. doi: 10.1080/07370008.2014.987058.10.1080/07370008.2014.987058
  16. Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549.10.2307/749690
  17. Korsun, I. (2017). The formation of learners’ motivation to study physics in terms of sustainable development of education in Ukraine. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(1), 117–128. doi: 10.1515/jtes-2017-0008.10.1515/jtes-2017-0008
  18. Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63. doi: 10.2307/1163068.10.2307/1163068
  19. McClain, K., & Cobb, P. (2001). Supporting students’ ability to reason about data. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 45(1/3), 103–129. doi: 10.1023/A:1013874514650.10.1023/A:1013874514650
  20. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
  21. Partanen, A., & Kaasila, R. (2015). Sociomathematical norms negotiated in the discussions of two small groups investigating calculus. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(4), 927–946. doi: 10.1007/s10763-014-9521-5.10.1007/s10763-014-9521-5
  22. Planas, N., & Civil, M. (2002). Understanding interruptions in the mathematics classroom: Implications for equity. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 14(3), 169–189. doi: 10.1007/BF03217361.10.1007/BF03217361
  23. Planas, N., & Gorgorio, N. (2004). Are different students expected to learn norms differently in the mathematics classroom? Mathematics Education Research Journal, 16(1), 19–40. doi: 10.1007/BF03217389.10.1007/BF03217389
  24. Putri, R. I., Dolk, M., & Zulkardi. (2015). Professional development of PMRI teachers for introducing social norms. Indonesian Mathematical Society Journal on Mathematics Education, 6(1), 11–19.10.22342/jme.6.1.1900.11-19
  25. Quale, A. (2012). On the role of constructivism in mathematical epistemology. Constructivist Foundations, 7(2), 104–112.
  26. Sherin, M. G. (2002). A balancing act: Developing a discourse community in a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5(3), 205–233. doi: 10.1023/A:1020134209073.10.1023/A:1020134209073
  27. Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2011). 5 practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions. Reston, VA: NCTM.
  28. Świtala, E. (2010). Values across countries in a modern society: The example of polish schools. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 1(2), 55–63. doi: 10.2478/dcse-2013-0014.10.2478/dcse-2013-0014
  29. Vetter, A., Meacham, M., & Schieble, M. (2013). Leveling the field: negotiating positions of power as a preservice teacher. Action in Teacher Education, 35(4), 230–251. doi: 10.1080/01626620.2013.827598.10.1080/01626620.2013.827598
  30. Weber, K., Radu, I., Mueller, M., Powell, A., & Maher, C. (2010). Expanding participation in problem solving in a diverse middle school mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(1), 91–118. doi: 10.1007/BF03217560.10.1007/BF03217560
  31. Williams, D. L., Edwards, B., Kuhel, K. A., & Lim, W. (2016). Culturally responsive dispositions in prospective mathematics teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 7(2), 17–33. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2016-0013.10.1515/dcse-2016-0013
  32. Wora, V. M., Hadisaputro, R., Rohman, N., Bugis, H., & Pambudi, S. N. A. (2017). Student improvement by applying the numbered heads together (NHT) approach to basic subjects of vocational competence in a vocational high school in Indonesia. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(2), 94–102. doi: 10.1515/dcse-2017-0018.10.1515/dcse-2017-0018
  33. Yackel, E., & Cobb, P. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 458–477.10.2307/749877
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 17
Published on: May 26, 2018
Published by: Daugavpils University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Sara Brooke Mullins, published by Daugavpils University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.