Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Does the Presidential Election Have Implications for a Better Environment in Indonesia? Cover

Does the Presidential Election Have Implications for a Better Environment in Indonesia?

Open Access
|Oct 2026

References

  1. Adams, J. (2001). A theory of spatial competition with biased voters: Party policies viewed temporally and comparatively. British Journal of Political Science, 31(1), 121–158.
  2. Aspinall, E. (2005). Elections and the Normalization of Politics in Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 13(2), 117–156.
  3. Atlas, M. (2007). Enforcement principles and environmental agencies: Principal-agent relationships in a delegated environmental program. Law & Society Review, 41(4), 939–980.
  4. Balboni, C., Burgess, R., Heil, A., Old, J., & Olken, B. A. (2021). Cycles of fire? Politics and forest burning in Indonesia. In AEA Papers and Proceedings (Vol. 111, pp. 415–419). 2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 37203: American Economic Association.
  5. Banerjee, S., & Hankla, C. R. (2014). Party systems and public goods: The dynamics of good governance in the Indian states. (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2484794). SSRN. doi.org
  6. Bergquist, P., & Warshaw, C. (2020). Elections and parties in environmental politics. In Handbook of US environmental policy (pp. 126–141). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  7. Besley, T., Persson, T., Sturm, D. M. (2010). Political competition, policy and growth: theory and evidence from the US. Rev Econ Stud 77:1329–1352.
  8. Biswas, S., Sen, P., Thota, B., Kodali, H., Datta, I. V., & Akash, K. M. V. (2024). Kinetic exchange opinion dynamics for the battleground-states in the 2024 US presidential elections (arXiv:2411.02240). arXiv. arxiv.org
  9. Bomberg, E. (2001). Profile – The US Presidential Election: Implications for Environmental Policy. Environmental Politics, 10(2), 115–121.
  10. Bošković, B. (2015). Air pollution, externalities, and decentralized environmental regulation. (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2781219). SSRN. doi.org
  11. Budge, I., & Farlie, D. (1983). Party competition: selective emphasis or direct confrontation?: an alternative view with data.
  12. Cremer, H., De Donder, P., & Gahvari, F. (2008). Political competition within and between parties: an application to environmental policy. Journal of Public Economics, 92(3–4), 532–547.
  13. Cox, R. (2013). Environmental communication and the public sphere (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
  14. Crippa, Monica, Diego Guizzardi, Marilena Muntean, E. Schaaf, et al. (2020). Fossil CO2 emissions of all world countries – 2020 Report. https://edgar.jrc.ec.europa.eu/overview.php?v=booklet2020
  15. Cruz, C., Labonne, J., & Querubin, P. (2020). Social structures, electoral competition and public goods provision. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 486–501.
  16. Dahalan, M., & Aziz, J. (2024). Multi-Dimensional Analysis of Policies, Sentiments, and Public Perceptions of 2024 Indonesian Presidential Candidates’ Environmental Commitment. River Studies, 1(3), 152–159.
  17. Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper and Row, New York.
  18. Fernández-i-Marín, X., Hinterleitner, M., Knill, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2024). Testing theories of policy growth: public demands, interest group politics, electoral competition, and institutional fragmentation. Journal of European Public Policy, 32(3), 784–809.
  19. Firdaus, S. (2026). Discursive construction of environmental sustainability in the 2024 Indonesian presidential debate: Critical discourse and ecolinguistic analysis. Critical Issue of Sustainable Future, 3(1), 15–33.
  20. Fredriksson, P. G., Neumayer, E., & Ujhelyi, G. (2007). Kyoto protocol cooperation: Does government corruption facilitate environmental lobbying? Public Choice, 133, 231–251.
  21. Global Footprint Network. (2023). National footprint and biocapacity accounts (1961 to 2022), 2023 edition. https://data.footprintnetwork.org
  22. Inglehart, R. (1981). Post-materialism in an environment of insecurity. American Political Science Review, 75(4), 880–900. https://doi.org/10.2307/1962290
  23. Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization, postmodernization and changing perceptions of risk. International Review of Sociology, 7(3), 449–459.
  24. Jacques, O. (2022). Electoral competition and the party politics of public investments. Party Politics, 28(6), 1029–1040.
  25. Komisi Pemilihan Umum. (n.d.). Pemilu dalam sejarah. Retrieved March 16, 2024, from https://www.kpu.go.id/page/read/12/pemilu-dalam-sejarah
  26. Konisky, D. M. (2007). Regulatory competition and environmental enforcement: is there a race to the bottom? American Journal of Political Science, 51(4), 853–872.
  27. Kotnik, Ž., Umek, L., Kovač, P., Stanimirović, D., & Vintar, M. (2020). Analysis of the key factors for successful public policy implementation: a qualitative study in Slovenia. DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review, 11(2), 113–140.
  28. Lau, J., & Wihardja, M. M. (2024). 2024/77 “Indonesia’s 2024 Presidential Election: How Personas and Policy Platforms Influenced Swing Voters” by Julia Lau and Maria Monica Wihardja.
  29. Lipscomb, M., & Mobarak, A. M. (2016). Decentralization and pollution spillovers: evidence from the re-drawing of county borders in Brazil. The Review of Economic Studies, 84(1), 464–502.
  30. Lizzeri, A., & Persico, N. (2001). The provision of public goods under alternative electoral incentives. American Economic Review, 91(1), 225–239.
  31. Mitchell, R. B. (2020). International Environmental Agreements Database Project (Version 2020.1) [Data set]. Université Laval. https://www.iea.ulaval.ca/en
  32. Nordhaus, W. (2015). Climate clubs: overcoming free-riding in international climate policy. American Economic Review, 105(4), 1339–70.
  33. Norton, B. G. (2000). Population and consumption: Environmental problems as problems of scale. Ethics & the Environment, 5(1), 23–45.
  34. Okthariza, N. (2023). The Dynamics of Coalition Politics and the Potential Postponement of the 2024 Indonesian Presidential Election. Indonesian Quarterly, 51(1).
  35. Pečarič, M. (2020). The inadequacy of classical regulatory approaches in a complex environment. DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review, 11(2), 91–112.
  36. Povitkina, M., Alvarado Pachon, N., & Dalli, C. M. (2021). The quality of government environmental indicators dataset, version sep21. University of Gothenburg: The Quality of Government Institute, https://www.gu.se/en/quality-government
  37. Przeworski, A. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990 (No. 3). Cambridge University Press.
  38. Ran, Q., Zhang, J. and Hao, Y. (2020). Does environmental decentralization exacerbate China’s carbon emissions? Evidence based on dynamic threshold effect analysis. Science of The Total Environment 721: 137656.
  39. Rezki, J. F. (2018). Political competition and local government performance: Evidence from Indonesia. SocArXiv. doi.org
  40. Rosenzweig, S. C. (2015). Does electoral competition affect public goods provision in dominant-party regimes? Evidence from Tanzania. Electoral Studies, 39, 72–84.
  41. Sasmi, D. T., & Park, J. (2024). Electoral competition, district party fragmentation and environmental policy outcome: Empirical evidence from Indonesia. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 9(4), 472–484.
  42. Sasmi, D. T., & Shi, M. (2024). Southeast Asian leaders’ political orientation towards the environmental policy outcome. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 9(3), 343–358.
  43. Sigman, H. (2005). Transboundary spillovers and decentralization of environmental policies. Journal of environmental economics and management, 50(1), 82–101.
  44. Stigler, G. J. (1972). Economic competition and political competition. Public Choice, 13, 91–106.
  45. The World Bank Group. (2021). Climate Change Knowledge Portal. https://climateknowledgeportal.worldbank.org
  46. Varieties of Democracy Project. (2024). Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Dataset [Version 14]. https://www.v-dem.net/data/the-v-dem-dataset/country-year-v-dem-fullothers-v14
  47. Wu, J., Deng, Y., Huang, J., Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2013). Incentives and outcomes: China’s environmental policy (No. w18754). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  48. Zimbalist, Z. (2022). How electoral competition shapes local public goods provision in South Africa. Democratization, 29(2), 253–275.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2026-0019 | Journal eISSN: 1804-8285 | Journal ISSN: 1804-6746 (formerly 1804-8285)
Language: English
Page range: 296 - 309
Submitted on: Jan 9, 2026
Accepted on: Jul 10, 2026
Published online: Oct 13, 2026
Published in print: Sep 1, 2026
Published by: European Research University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Dini Tiara Sasmi, Rendi Prayuda, Muhammad Arsy Ash Shiddiqy, published by European Research University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.