Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Features of Judicial Precedent as a Source of EU Tax Law Cover

Features of Judicial Precedent as a Source of EU Tax Law

Open Access
|May 2026

References

  1. Aberdeen Property Fininvest Alpha Oy, Case C-303/07, ECLI:EU:C:2009:377. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62007CJ0303
  2. Amurta SGPS v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst, Case C-379/05, ECLI:EU:C:2007:655. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62005CJ0379
  3. Anjos, M. D. R., Mimoso, M. J. (2021). International procedures to resolve dispute in tax law. Juridical Tribune, 11(1), 42–51.
  4. Babin, I. (2020). Features of the Application of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights by Ukrainian Courts in Tax Cases. DANUBE, 11(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2020-0005
  5. Babin, I. I. (2024). Precedential tax law of the EU Court. In Gavrilyuk, R. O., Patsurkivskyi, P. S. (Eds.). Tax law of the European Union as a value, 612–690. Yuri Fedkovich Chernivtsi National University.
  6. Baron, M. (2014). Stosowanie z urzędu prawa Unii Europejskiej przez sądy krajowe. Wolters Kluwer.Bobek, M. (2015). The Court of Justice of the European Union. In Arnull, A., Chalmers, D. (Eds.). The Oxford Handbook of European Union Law. Oxford University Press.
  7. Cadbury Schweppes plc v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, Case C-196/04, ECLI:EU:C: 2006:544. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62004CJ0196
  8. Cartesio Oktató és Szolgáltató bt, Case C-210/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:723. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62006CJ0210
  9. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. (2012). Official Journal of the European Union, C 326, 47–390. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT
  10. Coşman, E. (2017) Jurisprudenţa uniunii Europene şi rolul ei în armonizarea interpretării dreptulu. Legea şi viaţa, (August), 25–29.
  11. Craig, P., de Búrca, G. (2020). EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (7th ed.). Oxford University Press.
  12. European Commission v Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe, Joined Cases C-885/19 P and C-898/19 P, ECLI:EU:C:2022:859. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62019CJ0885
  13. European Commission v Fiat Chrysler Finance Europe, Joined Cases C-885/19 P and C-898/19 P, ECLI:EU:C:2022:859. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62019CJ0885
  14. Glukh, M., Serdiuk, V., Selezen, P., Babenko, A. (2021). The OECD model tax convention and its commentaries as a source of interpretation of double taxation treaties in Ukraine. Juridical Tribune, 11(2), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.24818/TBJ/2021/11/2.08
  15. Halifax plc v Commissioners of Customs and Excise, Case C-255/02, ECLI:EU:C:2006:121. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62002CJ0255
  16. Kawczyńska, M. (2020). The Court of Justice of the European Union as a law-maker: enhancing integration or acting ultra vires? In Florczak-Wątor, M. (Ed.). Judicial Law-Making in European Constitutional Courts. Routledge.
  17. Kittel and Recolta Recycling, Joined Cases C-439/04 and C-440/04, ECLI:EU:C:2006:446. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62004CJ0439
  18. Kohajda, M., Otta, Š. (2025). The Court of Justice and Compensation for Non-Material Damage in Case of Infringement of the GDPR. DANUBE, 16(3), 240–263. https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2025-0012.
  19. Komarova, T. (2018). The legal power of the decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU. Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University. Law series, 49(2), 193–196.
  20. Korving, J. (2023). Interpretation of EU (direct) Tax Directives: The Judges Will Decide. In Lindholm, J., Hultqvist, A. (Eds.). The Power to Tax in Europe, 14, 205–232. Hart Publishing.
  21. Lang, M., Pistone, P., Schuch, J., Staringer, C., Storck, A. (2021). Introduction to European Tax Law: Direct Taxation (6th ed.). Linde.
  22. Mączyński, D. (2019). Bezpośredni wpływ orzecznictwa Trybunału Sprawiedliwości Unii Europejskiej na stanowienie prawa podatkowego w Polsce (wstęp do badań). Ruch prawniczy, ekonomiczny i socjologiczny, 81(3), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2019.81.3.2
  23. Marks & Spencer plc v David Halsey, Case C-446/03, ECLI:EU:C:2005:763. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62003CJ0446
  24. National Grid Indus BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst Rijnmond, Case C-371/10, ECLI:EU:C:2011:785. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62010CJ0371
  25. Newey v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, Case C-653/11, ECLI: EU:C:2013:409. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62011CJ0653
  26. Novackova, D., Peracek, T. (2021). The Common European Investment Policy and Its Perspectives in the Context of the Achmea Case Law. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 11(1), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2021-0010
  27. Ondria, P., Guliš, R. (2025). The Impact of Membership in the European Union on the Development of Tax Reforms in the Slovak Republic. Juridical Tribune, 15(2), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.62768/TBJ/2025/15/2/07
  28. Oy AA v Skatteverket, Case C-231/05, ECLI:EU:C:2007:439. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62005CJ0231
  29. Paint Graphos and Others, Joined Cases C-78/08 to C-80/08, ECLI:EU:C:2011:550. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62008CJ0078
  30. Part Service Srl v Ministero delle Finanze, Case C-425/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:108. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62006CJ0425
  31. Pistone, P. (2010). The impact of ECJ case law on national taxation. Bulletin for International Taxation, 64(8/9). https://doi.org/10.59403/2d46twd
  32. Skandia America Corp. (USA), filial Sverige v Skatteverket, Case C-7/13, ECLI:EU:C:20 14:2225. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62013CJ0007
  33. Wattel, P. J. (2022). Conceptual background of the CJEU case law in direct tax matters. In Terra, B. J. M., Wattel, P. J. (Eds.). European Tax Law (8th ed., Vol. 1.) Wolters Kluwer.
  34. World Duty Free Group SA v European Commission, Joined Cases C-51/19 P and C-64/19 P, ECLI:EU:C:2021:791. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62019CJ0051
  35. X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën, Case C-585/22, ECLI:EU:C:2024:193. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62022CJ0585
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2026-0007 | Journal eISSN: 1804-8285 | Journal ISSN: 1804-6746
Language: English
Page range: 103 - 115
Submitted on: Oct 9, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 7, 2026
Published on: May 21, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Igor Ivanovych Babin, published by European Research University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.