Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Taxonomy for Transparency in Non-Financial Statements – Clear Duty With Unclear Sanction Cover

Taxonomy for Transparency in Non-Financial Statements – Clear Duty With Unclear Sanction

Open Access
|Oct 2022

References

  1. Areeda, Ph. E. (1996). The Socratic method. Harvard Law Review, 109(5), 911–922.
  2. Ashford, N. A., Hall, R. P., et al. (2020). Addressing Inequality: The First Step Beyond COVID-19 and Towards Sustainability, Sustainability, 12, 5404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135404.10.3390/su12135404
  3. Balcerzak, A., MacGregor Pelikánová, R. (2020). Projection of SDGs in Codes of Ethics – Case study about Lost in Translation? Administrative Sciences, 10(4), 1–18. Paper 95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci10040095.10.3390/admsci10040095
  4. Bassott, Étienne (2021). European Parliament – The six policy priorities of the von der Leyen Commission – State of play in spring 2021. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/IDAN/2021/690584/EPRSIDA(2021)690584EN.pdf.
  5. Carroll, A. B. (2016). Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1:3. DOI: 10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6.
  6. D’Adamo, I., Lupi, G. (2021). Sustainability and Resilience after COVID-19: A Circular Premium in the Fashion Industry, Sustainability, 13, 1861.10.3390/su13041861
  7. European Commission (2021). What is the European Green Deal? Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/fs_19_6714.
  8. European Commission (2022). Sustainability-related disclosure in the financial services sector. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/banking-and-finance/sustainable-finance/sustainability-related-disclosure-financial-services-sector_en.
  9. Gallardo-Vázquez, D., Valder, D., Valdez, L., Castuera-Diáz, A. M. (2019). Corporate Social Responsibility as an Antecedent of innovation, Reputation, and Competitiveness Success: A Multiple Mediation Analysis, Sustainability, 11(20): 5614.10.3390/su11205614
  10. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X005010003.10.3102/0013189X005010003
  11. Kramer, M. R., Pfitzer, M. W. (2016). The Ecosystem of Shared Value. Business and society. Harvard Business Review, October 2016.
  12. Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  13. Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative Text Analysis – A Guide to Methods, Practice and Using Software. 1st ed. London: SAGE.10.4135/9781446288719
  14. MacGregor Pelikánová, R., Hála, M. (2021). CSR Unconscious Consumption by Generation Z in the COVID-19 era – Responsible Heretics not Paying CSR Bonus? Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(8), 390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14080390.10.3390/jrfm14080390
  15. MacGregor Pelikánová, R., MacGregor, R. K. (2020a). The Willingness of Generation Z to Officially Support CSR – A Central European Study. DANUBE: Law, Economics and Social Issues Review, 11(4), 271–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2020-0016.10.2478/danb-2020-0016
  16. MacGregor Pelikánová, R., MacGregor, R. K. (2020b). The EU puzzling CSR regime and the confused perception by ambassadors of luxury fashion businesses: A case study from Pařížská. Central European Business Review, 9(3), 74–108. DOI: 10.18267/j.cebr.240.
  17. MacGregor Pelikánová, R., Němečková, T., MacGregor, R. K. (2021a). CSR Statements in International and Czech Luxury Fashion Industry at the onset and during the COVID-19 pandemic – Slowing Down the Fast Fashion Business? Sustainability, 13(7): 3715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073715.10.3390/su13073715
  18. MacGregor Pelikánová, R., MacGregor, R. K.,Černek, M. (2021b). New trends in codes of ethics: Czech business ethics preferences by the dawn of COVID-19, Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(4), 973–1009. DOI: 10.24136/oc.2021.032.
  19. Nevima, J., Turečková, K., Vardzin, F. (2018). The role of public administration bodies in relation to the unsuccessful drawing funds from the European Union in the sphere of education. In Proceedings of 16th International Scientific Conference Economic Policy in the European Union Member Countries. Karviná: SU OPF Karviná, pp. 251–258. ISBN 978-80-7510-289-8.
  20. Petera, P., Wagner, J., Pakšiová, R. (2021). The Influence of Environmental Strategy, Environmental Reporting and Environmental Management Control System on Environmental and Economic Performance. Energies, 14(15), 1–20 online. DOI: 10.3390/en14154637.
  21. Popescu, C. R. G., Duháček-Šebestová, J. (2022). Fiscally Responsible Businesses as a Result of Covid-19 Pandemic Shock: Taking Control of Countries’ Tax Systems by Putting an End to Corporate Tax Evasion and Tax Havens. In Changing Dynamics in Responsible and Sustainable Business in the Post-COVID-19 Era. Edited by Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu. Hershey: IGI Global, ISBN13: 9781668433744, ISBN10: 1668433745, EISBN13: 978166-8433768, ISBN13 Softcover: 9781668433751. Retrieved May 20, 2022, from https://www.igi-global.com/book/covid-pandemic-impact-new-economy/283956.
  22. Porter, M. E., Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating Shared Value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.
  23. Schmidt, F. L., Hunter, J. E. (2014). Methods of Meta-Analysis – Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. London, UK: SAGE.
  24. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research – A Practical Handbook. London, UK: SAGE.
  25. Sroka, W., Szántó, R. (2018). Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics in Controversial Sectors: Analysis of Research Results. Journal of Entrepreneurship. Management and Innovation, 14, 111–126. DOI: 10.7341/20181435.
  26. Streimikiene, D., Ahmed, R. R. (2021). The integration of corporate social responsibility and marketing concepts as a business strategy: evidence from SEM-based multivariate and Toda-Yamamoto causality models. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(1), 125–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2021.006.10.24136/oc.2021.006
  27. Turečková, K., Nevima, J. (2018). SMART approach in regional development. In Proceedings of 16th International Scientific Conference Economic Policy in the European Union Member Countries. Karviná: SU OPF Karviná, pp. 386–394. ISBN 978-80-7510-289-8.
  28. Van Tulder, R., May Seitanidi, M., Crane, A., Brammer, S. (2016). Enhancing the Impact of Cross-Sector Partnerships. Four Impact Loops for Channelling Partnership Studies. Journal of Business Ethics, 135, 1–17.10.1007/s10551-015-2756-4
  29. Van Tulder, R., Keen, N. (2018). Capturing Collaborative Challenges: Designing Complexity-Sensitive Theories of Change for Cross-Sector Partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 315–332.10.1007/s10551-018-3857-7
  30. Vourvachis, P., Woodward, T. (2015). Content analysis in social and environmental reporting research: Trends and challenges. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 16(2), 166–195. DOI: 10.1108/JAAR-04-2013-0027.
  31. Yin, R. K. (2008). Study Research: Design Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/danb-2022-0011 | Journal eISSN: 1804-8285 | Journal ISSN: 1804-6746
Language: English
Page range: 173 - 195
Published on: Oct 17, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Radka MacGregor Pelikánová, Filip Rubáček, published by European Research University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.