Conceptual Framework and Empirical Methodology for Measuring Multidimensional Judicial Ideology
By:
References
- Alarie, R. D. B., Green, J. A. (2008). Should They All Just Get Along? Judicial Ideology, Collegiality, and Appointments to the Supreme Court of Canada. University of New Brunswick Law Journal, 53, 73–91.
- Alexander, S. G. (2002). Comparing the Two Legal Realisms – American and Scandinavian. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 50, 131–174.
- Alexy, R., Adler, R., MacCormick, N. (2009). Theory of Legal Argumentation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Altemeyer, R. (1981). Right-Wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
- Azizi, J. (2011). Unveiling the EU Courts’ Internal Decision-Making Process: A Case for Dissenting Opinions? ERA Forum, 12, 49–68.
- Bailey, A. M. (2016). Measuring Ideology on the Courts. In Howard, R. M., Randazzo K.A. (eds.). Routledge Handbook of Judicial Behavior. New York: Routledge.
- Bailey, A. M., Maltzman, F. (2008). Does Legal Doctrine Matter: Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court. American Political Science Review, 102, 369–384.
- Bailey, A. M., Maltzman, F. (2011). The Constrained Court: Law, Politics, and the Decisions Justices Make. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Bailey, A. M. (2013). Is Today's Court the Most Conservative in Sixty Years? Challenges and Opportunities in Measuring Judicial Preferences. Journal of Politics, 75, 821–834.
- Bjarup, J. (2005). The Philosophy of Scandinavian Legal Realism. Ratio Juris, 18(1), 1–15.
- Blanes i Vidal, J., Leaver, C. (2011). Are Tenured Judges Insulated from Political Pressure? Journal of Public Economics, 95, 570–586.
- Blanes i Vidal, J., Leaver C. (2013). Social Interactions and the Content of Legal Opinions. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 29, 78–114.
- Bricker, B. (2017). Breaking the Principle of Secrecy: An Examination of Judicial Dissent in the European Constitutional Courts. Law & Policy, 39(2), 170–191.
- Brouard, S. (2010). The Study of Judicial Politics in France. French Politics, 8, 72–76.
- Carmines, E. G., Ensley, M.J., Wagner, M.W. (2012). Political Ideology in American Politics: One, Two, or None? The Forum, 10(4), 1–18.
- Carrubba, J. C., Gabel, M., Hankla, C. (2008). Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice. American Political Science Review, 102(4), 435–452.
- Crawford, T. J., Brandt, M. J., Inbar, Y., Chambers, R. J., Motyl, M. (2017). Social and Economic Ideologies Differentially Predict Prejudice across the Political Spectrum, but Social Issues are Most Divisive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(3), 383–412.
- Dalla Pellegrina, L., Garoupa, N., Gomez-Pomar, F. (2014). Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in the Spanish Supreme Court: The Case of Administrative Review. International Review of Law and Economics, 52(C), 16–28.
- Dalla Pellegrina, L., De Mot, J., Faure, M., Garoupa, N. (2017). Litigating Federalism: An Empirical Analysis of the Belgian Constitutional Court Decisions. European Constitutional Law Review, 13(2), 305–346.
- Dalla Pelegrina, L., Garoupa, N. (2018). Estimating Judicial Ideal Points in a Bidimensional Court. Paper presented at the Conference on Empirical Legal Studies in Europe, Leuven.
- Duckitt, J., Sibley, C. G. (2007). Right wing authoritarianism, social dominance orientation and the dimensions of generalized prejudice. European Journal of Personality, 21(2), 113–130.
- Dunoff, L. J., Pollack, M. A. (2015). International Judicial Dissent: Causes and Consequences. Retrieved June 10, 2019, from https://eustudies.org/conference/papers/download/84, 1–41.
- Dworkin, R. Law's Empire. (1986). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Dworkin, R. Justice for Hedgehogs. (2013). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Epstein, L., Landes, W., Posner, R. A. (2013). The Behavior of Federal Judges: A Theoretical and Empirical Study of Rational Choice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Eisenberg, T., Fisher, T., Rosen-Zvi, I. (2013). Group Decision Making on Appellate Panels: Presiding Justice and Opinion Justice Influence in the Israel Supreme Court. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 282–296.
- Espinosa, R. (2013). Constitutional Judicial Behavior: Exploring the Determinants of the Decisions of the French Constitutional Court. Review of Law and Economics, 13(2), 1–37.
- Evans, G., Heath, A., Lalljee, M. (1996). Measuring Left-Right and Libertarian-Authoriarian Values in the British Electorate. British Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 93–112.
- Everett, A. C. J. (2013). The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS). PLoS ONE, 8(12), 1–11.
- Ferreira, P. F. A. N., Muller, B. (2014). How Judges Think in the Brazilian Supreme Court: Estimating ideal points and identifying dimensions. Economia, 15, 275–293.
- Fiorino, N., Padovano, F., Sgarra, G. (2007). The Determinants of Judicial Independence: Evidence from the Italian Constitutional Court (1956–2002). Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 163, 683–705.
- Fischman, B. J., Law, D. S. (2009). What is Judicial Ideology, and How do we Measure it? Washington Journal of Law and Policy, 29, 133–213.
- Fischman, B. J., Jacobi, T. (2016). The Second Dimension of the Supreme Court. William & Mary Law Review, 75, 1671–1715.
- Franck, R. (2009). Judicial Independence under a Divided Polity: A Study of the Rulings of the French Constitutional Court, 1959–2006. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 25, 262–284.
- Garoupa, N. (2011). “Empirical Legal Studies and Constitutional Courts”. The Indiana Journal of Constitutional Law, 5, 26–54.
- Garoupa, N., Gómez-Pomar, F., Grembi, V. (2013). Judging Politically: An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review Voting in the Spanish Constitutional Court. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 29, 513–534.
- Garoupa, N., Grembi, V. (2015). Judicial Review and Political Partisanship: Moving from Consensual to Majoritarian Democracy. International Review of Law and Economics, 43, 32–45.
- Garoupa, N. (2016). “Constitutional Review.” Retrieved June 10, 2019, from: economix.fr/pdf/workshops/2016_3rd_law_eco/NGaroupa.pdf.
- Ginsburg, R. B. (2010). The Role of Dissenting Opinions. Minnesota Law Review, 95(1), 1–8.
- Ginsburg, T. (2011). Building Reputation in Constitutional Courts: Political and Judicial Audiences. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 28(3), 539–568.
- Grendstad, G., Shaffer, W. R., Waltenburg, E. N. (2015). Policy Making in an Independent Judiciary: The Norwegian Supreme Court. Colchester: ECPR Press Monographs.
- Habermas, J. (1996). Between Facts and Norms, Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Haidt, J., Graham, J., Craig, J. (2009). Above and Below Left-Right: Ideological Narratives and Moral Foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 110–119.
- Hanretty, C. (2012a). The Decisions and Ideal Points of British Law Lords. British Journal of Political Science, 43, 703–716.
- Hanretty, C. (2012b). Dissent in Iberia: The Ideal Points of Justices on the Spanish and Portuguese Constitutional Tribunals. European Journal of Political Research, 51, 671–692.
- Hanretty, C. (2014). The Bulgarian Constitutional Court as an Additional Legislative Chamber. East European Politics and Societies, 28, 540–558.
- Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Hönnige, C. (2009). The Electoral Connection: How the Pivotal Judge Affects Oppositional Success in European Constitutional Courts. West European Politics, 35, 963–984.
- Iaryczower, M., Katz, G. (2016). More than Politics: Ability and Ideology in the British Appellate Committee. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 32, 61–93.
- Jackson, N. (2014). The Dimensional Structure of Symbolic Ideology: An Experiment on Liberal-Conservative Self-Placements. Retrieved June 10 from http://www.tess-experiments.org/data/jackson002.html.
- Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., Napier, J. L. (2009). Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337.
- Kantorowicz, J., Garoupa, N. (2016). An Empirical Analysis of Constitutional Review Voting in the Polish Constitutional Tribunal 2003–2013. Constitutional Political Economy, 27, 66–92.
- Kay, A. C., Jost, T. J. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of ‘poor but happy’ and ‘poor but honest’ stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 823–837.
- Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure Theory of Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Klar, S. (2014). A Multidimensional Study of Ideological Preferences and Priorities among the American Public. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(1), 334–359.
- Klein, D., Lindquist, S. A. (2012). Consensus, Disorder, and Ideology on the Supreme Court. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 9(1), 129–148.
- Kozinski, A. (1993). What I Ate for Breakfast and Other Mysteries of Judicial Decision Making. Loyola Los Angeles Law Review, 26, 993–1000.
- Kumar, N. P., Smyth, R. (2007). What Explains Dissent on the High Court of Australia? An Empirical Assessment Using a Cointegration and Error Correction Approach. (2007). Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4, 401–425.
- Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M. (2002). Party Polarization and Party Structuring of Policy Attitudes: A Comparison of Three NES Panel Studies. Political Behavior, 24, 199–236.
- Leiter, B. (2010). Legal Formalism and Legal Realism: What is the Issue? University of Chicago Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper, 320, 1–31.
- Maddox, W. S., Lilie, S. A. (1984). Beyond Liberal and Conservative: Reassessing the Political Spectrum. Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.
- Malecki, M. (2009). Judicial Behavior behind Mask and Shield: Modelling the European Court of Justice. Paper prepared for the 2009 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.
- Malecki, M. (2012). Do ECJ judges all speak with the same voice? Evidence of divergent preferences from the judgments of chambers. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 59–75.
- MacCormick, N. (2007). Institutions of Law: An Essay in Legal Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Mannheim, K. (1966). Ideology and Utopia: an Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. London: Routledge.
- Ostberg, C. L., Wetstein, M. E., Ducat, C. L. (2002). Attitudinal Dimensions of Supreme Court Decision Making in Canada: The Lamer Court, 1991–1995. Political Research Quarterly, 55, 242–49.
- Ostberg, C. L., Wetstein, M. E. (2007). Attitudinal Decision Making in the Supreme Court of Canada. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
- Padovano, F. (2009). The Time-Varying Independence of Italian Peak Judicial Institutions. Constitutional Political Economy, 20, 230–250.
- Pavčnik, M. (2013). Argumentacija v pravu. Ljubljana: GV Založba.
- Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741.
- Posner, E., de Figueiredo, M. (2004). Is the International Court of Justice Biased? John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper, 234, 1–44.
- Raffaeli, R. (2012). Study of Dissenting Opinions in the Supreme Courts of the Member States. Brussels: European Parliament.
- Raz, J. (2009). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Robertson, D. (1982). “Judicial Ideology in the House of Lords: A Jurimetic Analysis”. British Journal of Political Science, 12, 1–25.
- Robertson, D. (2010). The Judge as Political Theorist. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
- Rosenfeld, M. (2006). Comparing constitutional review by the European Court of Justice and the U.S. Supreme Court. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 4(4), 618–651.
- Santoni, M, Zucchini, F. (2003). Legislative Output and the Constitutional Court in Italy. Constitutional Political Economy, 17, 165–187.
- Schubert, A. G. (1965). The Judicial Mind: the Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946–1963. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
- Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology, 31, 421–452.
- Shachar, Y, Gross, M., Harris, R. (1997). Anatomy of Discourse and Dissent in the Supreme Court – Quantitative Analyses. Tel Aviv University Law Review, 20, 749–795.
- Songer, R. D., Johnson, S. W., Ostberg, C. L., Wetstein, M. E. (2012). Law, Ideology and Collegiality: Judicial Behaviour in the Supreme Court of Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queens University Press.
- Spitzer, M., Talley, E. (2013). Left, Right and Center: Strategic Information Acquisition and Diversity in Judicial Panels. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(3), 638–680.
- Swedlow, B. (2008). Beyond Liberal and Conservative: Two-dimensional Conceptions of Ideology and the Structure of Political Attitudes and Values. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13, 157–180.
- Swedlow, B., Wyckoff, M. L. (2009). Value Preferences and Ideological Structuring of Attitudes in American Public Opinion. American Politics Research, 37, 1048–1087.
- Tamanaha, Z. B. (2009). Beyond the Realist-Formalist Divide: The Role of Politics in Judging. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Thompson, M., Ellis, R., Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Toplak, J. (2016). Judicial Behavior on the European Court of Human Rights. ECPR General Conference, Prague.
- Treier, S., Hillygus, D. S. (2009). The Nature of Political Ideology in the Contemporary Electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73, 679–703.
- Vanberg, G. (2005). The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Voeten, E. (2008). The Impartiality of International Judges: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights. American Political Science Review, 102(4), 417–433.
- Volcansek, L. M. (2000). Constitutional Politics in Italy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan Press.
- Weinshall-Margel, K. (2011). Attitudinal and Neo-Institutional Models of Supreme Court Decision Making: An Empirical and Comparative Perspective from Israel. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 8, 556–586.
- Wetstein, E. M., Ostberg, C. L., Songer, D., Johnson, S. (2009). Ideological Consistency and Attitudinal Conflict: A Comparison of the U.S. and Canadian Supreme Courts. Comparative Political Studies, 42, 763–792.
Language: English
Page range: 129 - 159
Published on: Jul 25, 2019
Published by: European Association Comenius - EACO
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2019 Matej Avbelj, Janez Šušteršič, published by European Association Comenius - EACO
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.