Procedural Safeguards under the European Convention on Human Rights in Public (Administrative) Law Matters

Sever, Tina

doi:10.2478/danb-2018-0007

Abstract

The effectiveness of procedure is important for parties (e.g. citizens or business entities) to be able to exercise their rights in due time and is a key foundation of the rule of law. A State with an effective legal system provides a business-friendly environment, which is appealing for investments. The State decides on permits, licenses, taxes, etc. by applying administrative procedure. The aim of the paper is to identify and analyse such matters under public (administrative) law at the national level, which – due to their influence on private rights or obligations – fall under the civil or criminal limb of Article 6 of the ECHR and its requirements, as well as the requirements of Article 13. By means of a case study and descriptive-analytical and normative methods, the paper identifies comparatively selected cases and analyses the ECtHR test regarding reasonable time, focusing on overall procedure duration and the awarded compensations. The findings show that the ECtHR does not define reasonable time in abstracto. Therefore, the established violations among the states range from two-year procedures to nine years and more, depending on the circumstances of each individual case. Similarly, there are also variations in terms of compensation awarded.

References

Council of Europe. (2006). Report on the Effectiveness of National Remedies in Respect of Excessive Length of Proceedings. Retrieved January 11, 2017, from http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2006)036rev-e.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Council of Europe/European Court of Human Rights. (2013). Guide on Article 6, Right to a Fair Trial, Civil Limb. Retrieved January 7, 2017, from http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Guide_Art6_ENG.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Galič, A. (2000). Evropska konvencija človekovih pravic in Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice [European Convention on Human Rights and European Court of Human Rights]. In Pavčnik, M.; Mavčič, A. (eds.). Ustavno sodstvo [Constitutional Justice]. Ljubljana: Cankarjeva založba.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Galič, A. (2004). Ustavno civilno procesno pravo, Ustavna procesna jamstva, Ustavna pritožba – meje preizkusa in postopek [Constitutional Civil Procedural Law, Constitutional Procedural Guarantees, Constitutional Complaint – Scope of Review and Procedure]. Ljubljana: GV.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gorjanc-Prelević, T. (ed.) (2009). Pravo na suðenje u razumnom roku, Zbirka izabranih presuda Evropskog suda za ljudska prava u slučajevima protiv Bosne i Hercegovine, Hrvatske, Makedonije, Slovenije in Srbije [Right to a Trial Within Reasonable Time, List of ECtHR Judgements in matters v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Slovenia and Serbia]. Retrieved January 5, 2017, from http://www.hrc.unsa.ba/zbirkapresuda/PDFS/zbirkapresuda.pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Grotrian, A. (1996). Article 6 of the European convention on human rights: the right to a fair trial. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
HUDOC, European Court of Human Rights. Retrieved January 5, 2017, from http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leszczyńska, A. (2009). The European Convention on Human Rights as an Instrument of Taxpayer Protection. In Włodzimierz, N.; Małgorzata, S. (eds.). Protection of Taxpayer’s Rights: European, International and Domestic Tax Law Perspective. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer business.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Macdonald, R. St. J., Matscher, F., and Petzold, H. (eds). (1993). The European System for the Protection of Human Rights. Dordrecht; Boston; London: M. Nijhoff Publishers.10.1163/9789004633599
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Miller, V. (2011). The European Convention on Human Rights and the Court of Human Rights: issues and reforms, House of Commons. Retrieved January 11, 2017, from file:///C:/Users/Uporabnik/Downloads/SN05936%20(1).pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mole, N., and Harby, C. (2006). The right to a fair trial, A guide to the implementation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Human Rights handbooks, No. 3. Directorate General of Human Rights, Council of Europe. Retrieved January 11, 2017, from http://www.echr.coe.int/LibraryDocs/DG2/HRHAND/DG2-EN--HRHAND-03(2006).pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Regulation of European Parliament and of the Council on an open, efficient and independent European administration (draft) (2016). Retrieved January 13, 2017, from file:///C:/Users/Uporabnik/Downloads/s-2014_2019-plmrep-COMMITTEES-JURI-DV2016-04-20-1090614_CLEAN_EN%20(2).pdf.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sever, T. (2014). Pravno varstvo odločanja v razumnih rokih v upravnih zadevah, doktorska disertacija [The Legal Protection of Issuing Decisions in a Reasonable Time in Administrative Matters]. PhD thesis, Ljubljana: Evropska pravna fakulteta.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sever, T. (2016). Conducting procedures in administrative matters in reasonable time – analysis of selected case law by the European Court of Human Rights versus Slovenia. International journal of public policy, 12 (3/4/5/6), 149–16.10.1504/IJPP.2016.079764
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sever, T., Ðanić, A., and Kovač, P. (2014). Judicial protection of timely decision-making in administrative matters in the light of European convention on human rights in Slovenia and Croatia, NISPAcee Conference, Budapest, May 2014, Government vs. governance in Central and Eastern Europe: from pre-Weberianism to neo-Weberianism?
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sever, T., Ðanić, A., and Kovač, P. (2016). Effective legal protection against the excessive length of administrative decision-making: the cases of Slovenia and Croatia. The NISPAcee journal of public administration and policy, 9 (1), 135–166.10.1515/nispa-2016-0007
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sever, T., Rakar, I., and Kovač, P. (2014). Protecting Human Rights Through Fundamental Principles of Administrative Procedures in Eastern Europe. DANUBE, Law and Economics review, 5 (4), 249–275.10.2478/danb-2014-0014
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Urbančič, M. (2012). Nepremoženjska škoda zaradi kršitve pravice do sojenja brez nepo-trebnega odlašanja [Non-pecuniary Damage due to Violation of a Right to a Trial without Undue Delay]. Pravna praksa, 31(5), II–VIII.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Dijk et al. (eds.) (2006). Theory and Practice of the European Convention on Human Rights (4th ed.). Antwerpen, Oxford: Intersentia.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Vitkauskas, D., and Dikov, G. (2012). Protecting the right to a fair trial under the European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Human Rights Handbooks.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
White, R. C. A., and Ovey, C. (2010). Jacobs, White, and Ovey: the European Convention on Human Rights (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/he/9780199543380.001.0001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Zupančič, B. M. (2004). O razlagi sodnih precedensov in sodb ter posebej sodb Evrop-skega sodišča za človekove pravice [About the Interpretation of Judicial Precedents and Judgments and Especially European Court of Human Rights Judgments]. Revus, 2(2), 9–27.10.4000/revus.1522
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Procedural Safeguards under the European Convention on Human Rights in Public (Administrative) Law Matters

Abstract

Paradigm

My account