Perception of ESG Standards Implementation in Polish SMEs - Pilot Study
References
- Ab Aziz, N. H., Abdul Latiff, A. R., Osman, M. N. H., Alshdaifat, S. M., 2023.
ESG and corporate governance: A systematic review. Advanced International Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, 5(18), 185–204, DOI: 10.35631/AIJBES.518018 - Banu, S. Z., Vimala, V., 2024.
Integration of ESG principles: An initiative for transformation from linear economy to circular economy . Theoretical and Applied Economics ECTAP, 2(639), 183-196, DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4895267 - Belas, J., Balcerzak, A. P., Dvorsky, J., Streimikis, J., 2024.
Influencing ESG perception in SMEs through CSR, business ethics, and HRM: An empirical study in V4 countries . Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 26(66), 532–549, DOI: 10.24818/EA/2024/66/532 - Bielawska, A., 2023.
Socially responsible activity of micro-, small-, and medium-sized enterprises— Benefits for the enterprise . Sustainability, 15(3), 1234–1248, DOI: 10.xxxx/su15031234 - Directive (EU) 2022/2464 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 amending Regulation (EU) No 537/2014, Directive 2004/109/EC, Directive 2006/43/EC, and Directive 2013/34/EU as regards corporate sustainability reporting. Official Journal of the European Union, L 322/15. Retrieved from
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32022L2464 - Dmuchowski, P., Dmuchowski, W., Baczewska-Dąbrowska, A. H., Gworek, B, 2023.
Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) model; impacts and sustainable investment – Global trends and Poland’s perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 329, 117023, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117023 - Dudek, D., Kulej-Dudek, E., 2024.
Modern technologies in ESG reporting - evidence from Polish enterprises. Procedia Computer Science, 246, 5359–5367, DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.659 - Huang, W., Lin, G., 2023.
The relationship between urban green space and social health of individuals: A scoping review . Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 85, 127969, DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2023.127969 - Ingaldi, M., Ulewicz, R., 2024.
The business model of a circular economy in the innovation and improvement of metal processing. Sustainability, 16(13), 5513, DOI: 10.3390/su16135513 - Kang, H., Kim, J., 2022.
Analyzing and visualizing text information in corporate sustainability reports using natural language processing methods. Applied Sciences, 12(11), 5614, DOI: 10.3390/app12115614 - Kaźmierczak, M., 2022.
A literature review on the difference between CSR and ESG. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology, Organization and Management Series, 162, 231–248, DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2022.162.16 - Khamisu, M. S., Paluri, R. A., 2024.
Emerging trends of environmental social and governance (ESG) disclosure research . Cleaner Production Letters, 7, 100079, DOI: 10.1016/j.clpl.2024.100079 - Khamisu, M. S., Paluri, R. A., Sonwaney, V., 2024.
Stakeholders’ perspectives on critical success factors for environmental social and governance (ESG) implementation . Journal of Environmental Management, 365, 121583, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121583 - Khan, S., Piprani, A. Z., Yu, Z., 2022.
Digital technology and circular economy practices: Future of supply chains. Operations Management Research, 15(4), 676–688, DOI: 10.1007/s12063-021-00247-3 - KPMG, 2024. 2024 ESG Organization Survey: Addressing the strategy execution gap in sustainability reporting. KPMG International.
https://home.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2024/02/kpmg-esg-organization-survey-2024.pdf - Kuzior, A., 2024a.
Smart city conceptual framework in the context of achieving sustainable development goals. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 32(2), 156–161, DOI: 10.2478/mspe-2024-0015 - Kuzior, A., 2024b.
Development of offshore wind energy in Poland. AIP Conf. Proc. 3033, 020021, DOI: 10.1063/5.0188497 - Leung, T. C. H., Chiu, W.-K., You, C. S.-X., Fong, B. Y. F. 2023.
Environmental, social and governance and sustainable development in healthcare . Springer. - Liu, M., Luo, X., Lu, W.-Z., 2023.
Public perceptions of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) based on social media data: Evidence from China . Journal of Cleaner Production, 387, 135840, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135840 - Mbhalati, M. L., Masehela, F. K. 2024. ESG and SDG reporting practices: A qualitative review of the lessons from the top 30 FTSE/JSE-listed companies. In D. Mhlanga, M. Dzingirai (Eds.),
Fostering long-term sustainable development in Africa , Palgrave Macmillan, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-61321-0_11 - Oh, H. J., Lee, B., Ma, H. H., Jang, D., Park, S., 2024.
A preliminary study for developing perceived ESG scale to measure public perception toward organizations’ ESG performance. Public Relations Review, 50(1), 102398, DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2023.102398 - Ozkan, S., Romagnoli, S., Rossi, P., 2023.
A novel approach to rating SMEs’ environmental performance: Bridging the ESG gap. Ecological Indicators, 157, 111151, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111151 - Peng, J., Gao, J., Tong, X., Guo, J., Yang, H., Qi, J., Li, R., Li, N., Xu, M., 2024.
Advanced unstructured data processing for ESG reports: A methodology for structured transformation and enhanced analysis. arXiv, DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.02992 - Polish ESG Association, 2024. Guide to ESG for SMEs. Łukasiewicz – ITECH.
https://www.polskiestowarzyszenieesg.pl - Pyka, I., Pyka, J., 2023.
ESG risk management in the corporate lending process in Poland . Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology: Organization and Management Series, 187, 550–556, DOI: 10.29119/1641-3466.2023.187.28 - Ramakrishna, S., Ramasubramanian, B., 2024. Handbook of materials circular economy. Springer. ISBN:978-981-97-0588-7
- Székely, N., vom Brocke, J., 2017.
What can we learn from corporate sustainability reporting? Deriving propositions for research and practice from over 9,500 corporate sustainability reports published between 1999 and 2015 using topic modelling technique. PLoS ONE, 12(4), e0174807, DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174807 - Szromek, A. R., Bugdol, M., 2024.
Sharing heritage through open innovation—An attempt to apply the concept of open innovation in heritage education and the reconstruction of cultural identity . Heritage, 7(1), 193–205, DOI: 10.3390/heritage7010010 - Tutak, M., Brodny, J., 2024.
Technological progress in central and eastern Europe: Digitalization and business innovation leaders and outsiders . Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(4), 100404, DOI: 10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100404 - United Nations, 2015. Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development (Resolution A/RES/70/1). Retrieved from
https://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1 - Zhu, F., Liu, D, 2024.
Impact of blockchain technology on the quality of ESG information disclosure. Procedia Computer Science, 243, 197-205, DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2024.09.026 - Zioło, M., Bąk, I., Sinha, R., Datta, M., 2019. ESG Risk Perception in Sustainable Financial Decisions. Quantitative Methods Perspective. In L. S. Sanches, F. F. Amaral, J. V. da Silva Filho (Eds.),
Sustainability Measures for Financial Decision-Making (231–248), Springer, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-30251-1_12
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/czoto-2024-0032 | Journal eISSN: 2657-5450
Language: English
Page range: 299 - 310
Submitted on: Dec 2, 2024
Accepted on: Dec 20, 2024
Published on: Dec 31, 2024
Published by: Quality and Production Managers Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2024 Piotr Sakiewicz, Józef Ober, Małgorzata Kopiec, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.