Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Study on Safety Management in Turkish Earthquakes

System Safety: Human - Technical Facility - Environment
Volume 5 (2023): Issue 1 (December 2023)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. AFAD, 06 Şubat. 2023. pazarcik (Kahramanmaraş) - AFAD. https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/assets/pdf/Kahramanmaras%20%20Depremleri_%20On%20Degerlendirme%20Raporu.pdf
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Akdağ, M., 2005. Halkla ilişkiler ve kriz yönetimi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14, 1-20. Akdemir, A. B. ve Kılıç, A. (2021). Nitel makalelerin yöntem analizi. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(2), 486-502.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Asunakutlu, T. ve Dirlik, S., 2009. Kriz yönetimi stratejileri ve kriz sonrası yeniden yapılanma, Kriz Yönetimi. 33-60.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Ay, Ş., 2023. Kahramanmaraş Pazarcık ve Elbistan depremleri sonrası hasarlı yapıların malzeme kalitesi ve uygulama hatalarının değerlendirilmesi. In International Conference on Engineering, Natural and Social Sciences, 1, 245-251.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Aydınbaş, G., 2023. Sosyoekonomik boyutuyla Türkiye’de depremler üzerine bir inceleme: Kahramanmaraş depremi örneği. Sosyal Bilimlere Çok Yönlü Yaklaşımlar: Tarih, Turizm, Eğitim, Ekonomi, Siyaset ve İletişim, 177-212.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Ayyürek, O., 2014. Eğitim örgütlerinde kriz yönetimi: Van depremi örneği, Yüksek lisans tezi/ Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi]. YÖK Tez Merkezi.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Bommer, J., Spence, R., Erdik, M., Tabuchi, S., Aydinoglu, N., Booth, E. et al., 2022. Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance. J of Seismology, 6 (3) (2002). 431-446
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Can, H., 2005. Organizasyon ve Yönetim. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Comfort, L. K., Siciliano, M. D. ve Okada, A. 2011. Resilience, entropy, and efficiency in Crisis management: the January 12, 2010, Haiti earthquake. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 2(3), 1-25.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Frost, J., 2023. Worldwide lessons from Turkey earthquakes building safety problems. Insurance Business America.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Görüm, T.; Tanyaş, H., 2023. Less than expected? Landslides triggered by the 2023 Mw 7.7 and 7.6 Kahramanmaras (Türkiye) earthquake sequence. In Proceedings of the EGU General Assembly 2023, EGU23-17606, Vienna, Austria, 24–28
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Melgar, D.; Taymaz, T.; Ganas, A.; Crowell, B.; Öcalan, T.; Kahraman, M.; Tsironi, V.; Yolsal-Çevikbilen, S.; Valkaniotis, S.; Irmak, T.S., 2023. Sub-and super-shear ruptures during the 2023 Mw 7.8 and Mw 7.6 earthquake doublet in SE Türkiye. Seismica 2023, 2, 1–10
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Mercimek, Ö., 2023. Seismic failure modes of masonry structures exposed to Kahramanmaraş earthquakes. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2023, 151, 107422
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Oakey, J. 2023. Turkey’s earthquakes raise questions over dam safety and its transboundary implications. Azure Strategy.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Okumus, C., 2022. Turkey safety & Security: Disaster Management. Market Intelligence
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Taftsoglou, M.; Valkaniotis, S.; Karantanellis, E.; Goula, E.; Papathanassiou, G. 2023. Preliminary Mapping of Liquefaction Phenomena Triggered by the February 6 2023 M7.7 Earthquake, Türkiye/Syria, Based on Remote Sensing Data. Zenodo. https://zenodo.org/record/7668401 (accessed on 25 April 2023).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Türkiye Recovery and Reconstruction Assessment (TERRA). Türkiye Earthquakes Recovery and Reconstruction Assessment. Report with the Support of the United Nations and the European Union, with Select Inputs from World Bank Staff. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Turkiye-Recovery-and-Reconstruction-Assessment.pdf (accessed on 20 April 2023).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Türkiye’de yerel yönetimlerde kriz ve afet yönetim çalışmalarının mevzuat açısından değerlendirilmesi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Teknik Araştırmalar Dergisi, (12), 195-219.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. United States Geological Survey (USGS). M 7.5—Elbistan Earthquake, Kahramanmaras Earthquake Sequence. https://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eventpage/us6000jlqa/executive (accessed on 15 April 2023).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Veri, Kaynagi, 2023. Year of construction of buildings in earthquake-affacted provinces. https://www.verikaynagi.com/genel/6-subat-kahramanmaras-depremininardindan/
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/czoto-2023-0024 | Journal eISSN: 2657-5450
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 224 - 230
Submitted on: Nov 4, 2023
Accepted on: Dec 6, 2023
Published on: Dec 29, 2023
Published by: Quality and Production Managers Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
earthquake,
debris management,
safety management,
risk management
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Business management, other,
Engineering,
Mechanical engineering,
Production technology,
Social sciences,
Sociology,
Sociology of science, technology, and environment,
Communication science,
Interpersonal communication

© 2023 Renata Stasiak-Betlejewska, Gökhan Ömek, published by Quality and Production Managers Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 5 (2023): Issue 1 (December 2023)Next article