Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Prediction Model for the Filtration of Smoke Aerosol Particles by Cellulose Acetate Filters Cover

Prediction Model for the Filtration of Smoke Aerosol Particles by Cellulose Acetate Filters

Open Access
|Oct 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1.

The physical parameters of filter rods.

CodeTow specificationsPressure drop (Pa)Length (cm)aCircumference (cm)
Rb3.0Y/32000290012.02.42
F0013.0Y/35000329312.02.42
F0023.0Y/35000268010.02.42
F0033.0Y/34000280010.02.41
F0043.0Y/34000270010.02.41
F0053.0Y/34000280010.02.41
F0063.0Y/35000290010.02.41
F0073.0Y/32000350010.82.41
F0084.8Y/22000340012.01.98
F0095.1Y/22000340012.01.98
F0105.8Y/22000340012.01.98
F0115.8Y/26000340012.01.98
F0125.8Y/26000347012.01.98
F0135.8Y/26000367012.01.98
F0145.8Y/26000372512.01.98
F0155.8Y/26000405312.01.98
F0166.0Y/17000379012.01.70
F0178.0Y/15000314012.01.70
F0188.0Y/15000340012.01.70

a This length refers to the length of filter rod sample. The testing cigarettes were made with 3 cm segments cut from the filter rods

b R denotes the sample code of the reference filter rod whose filtration data are used to fit the relationship between flow velocity and filtration coefficient..

Figure 1.

Schematic diagram of smoke aerosol particles filtration in the filter.

Figure 2.

Relation between the natural logarithm of smoke aerosol particles penetration rate and filter length.

Figure 3.

Relation between the natural logarithm of smoke aerosol particles penetration rate and filter pressure drop.

Figure 4.

Relation between the natural logarithm of smoke aerosol particles penetration rate and tow specifications.

Figure 5.

Relation between filtration coefficient of smoke aerosol particles and flow velocity.

Figure 6.

Experimental values and predicted values of filtration coefficient on smoke aerosol particles.

Table 2.

Reported values (28) and predicted values of filtration efficiencies on “tar” in filters.

CodeCircumference (cm)Length (cm)Pressure drop (cm × H2O)Reported value of “tar” filtration efficiency (%)Predicted value of “tar” filtration efficiency (%)Deviation (%)
12.4852.100109.055.657.1−2.66
22.1922.100138.053.053.4−0.71
32.3492.100107.052.050.92.05
42.4761.50055.036.434.06.64
52.4762.10090.051.049.92.13
62.4762.700113.056.657.4−1.40
72.4902.10067.044.040.77.47
82.4481.50042.027.226.52.70
92.4482.10057.036.934.66.27
102.4482.70076.043.342.71.46
112.3522.10098.047.448.0−1.31
122.4752.10066.041.939.75.16
132.5742.10062.045.641.29.75
142.4812.10061.043.737.614.01
152.4382.43850.032.330.84.65
162.4382.43868.040.838.94.72
172.3362.33661.035.833.07.94
182.4802.48054.036.934.17.65
192.5882.58844.036.531.813.00
202.4792.47948.433.231.16.21
212.4812.481126.057.961.6−6.35
222.3412.341117.053.153.2−0.16
232.4752.475133.055.263.3−14.72
242.4752.475144.061.266.2−8.24
252.4752.475187.069.975.6−8.14
262.4412.44193.050.349.12.37
272.4792.30065.045.238.913.98
282.4792.90076.047.843.88.43
292.4702.30050.032.331.33.18
302.5842.30080.049.649.30.61
312.4772.30070.044.541.17.67
3224312.30057.034.133.61.49
332.4312.90071.038.939.9−2.69
342.3392.30089.041.043.8−6.79
352.4692.30063.035.837.6−5.09
362.5882.30070.942.045.4−8.02
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cttr-2026-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2719-9509 (formerly 1612-9237)
Language: English, French, German
Page range: 187 - 196
Submitted on: Jun 1, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 21, 2026
Published on: Oct 12, 2026
Published by: Beiträge zur Tabakforschung GmbH
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Ruihong Liu, Jizhao Guo, Xuehui Sun, Shuwei Guo, Zhihua Liu, Zhenhua Yu, Chao Wang, Peijian Sun, Shaodong Hu, Fuwei Xie, Baoshan Yue, published by Beiträge zur Tabakforschung GmbH
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License.