References
- Hughes, J.R.: Applying Harm Reduction to Smoking; Tob. Control 4 (1995) S33–S38. DOI: 10.1136/tc.4.suppl2.S33
- Buckell, J., L.M. Fucito, S. Krishnan-Sarin, S. O’Malley, and J.L. Sindelar: Harm Reduction for Smokers with Little to No Quit Interest: Can Tobacco Policies Encourage Switching to E-Cigarettes?; Tob. Control 32 (2023) e173–e179. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057024
- Polosa, R., P. Caponnetto, J.B. Morjaria, G. Papale, D. Campagna, and C. Russo: Effect of an Electronic Nicotine Delivery Device (E-Cigarette) on Smoking Reduction and Cessation: A Prospective 6-Month Pilot Study; BMC Public Health 11 (2011) 786. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-786
- Gupta, P.C.: The Public Health Impact of Tobacco; Curr. Sci. 81 (2001) 475–481.
- U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA): Website - Tobacco Regulatory Science Research Program; FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA, last updated August 21, 2024. Available at:
https://www.fda.gov/tobacco-products/tobacco-science-research/tobacco-regulatory-science-research-program (accessed July 21, 2025). - U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Tobacco Products (CTP): Website - Tobacco Regulatory Science Research Program at FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products: Summary and Highlights: Fiscal Years 2010–2017; FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA. Available at:
https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/GOVPUB-HE20_4000-PURL-gpo138344 (accessed July 21, 2025). - U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Center for Tobacco Products (CTP): Tobacco Products: Principles for Designing and Conducting Tobacco Product Perception and Intention Studies. Guidance for Industry; FDA, Rockville, MD, USA, 2022.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER): Patient-Focused Drug Development: Collecting Comprehensive and Representative Input: Guidance for Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Other Stakeholders; FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2020.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), and Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH): Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims; FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2009.
- Acquadro, C., F. Ayala-Fierro, R. Black, X. Cahours, C. Chrea, G. Curtin, L. Giles, S. Mccaffrey, C.H. Park, K. Prasad, M.A. Sarkar, N. Sherwood, S. Shiffman, J. Smith, and E. Spies: A Consortium Approach for Consumer-Reported Outcome Measures for Assessing Tobacco and/or Nicotine-Containing Products; presented at the SRNT 26th Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA, USA, March 11–14, 2020.
- McCaffrey, S., E. Afolalu, R. Black, C. Chrea, G. Curtin, L. Giles, D. Nishihara, K. Prasad, M. Sarkar, and M. Shetty: PNS46 Development of Consumer-Reported Outcome Measure (CROM) Standards for the Tobacco Industry with Respect to Psychometric CROM Using a Consortium-Based Approach: Methodology and Scope; Value Health 24 (2021) S181. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.901
- 28th Annual Conference of the International Society for Quality of Life Research; Qual. Life Res. 30 (2021) 1–177. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02976-1
- McCaffrey, S., E. Afolalu, R. Black, C. Chrea, G. Curtin, L. Giles, D. Nishihara, K. Prasad, M. Sarkar, and M. Shetty: Development of Consumer-Reported Outcome Measure (CROM) Best Practices and Guidelines for the Tobacco Industry with Respect to Psychometric CROM Using a Consortium-Based Approach: Methodology and Scope; presented at the SRNT 27th Annual Meeting (virtual), February 24–27, 2021, Poster # RR-067.
- Jones, P.W., F.H. Quirk, C.M. Baveystock, and P. Littlejohns: A Self-Complete Measure of Health Status for Chronic Airflow Limitation: The St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire; Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 145 (1992) 1321–1327. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/145.6.1321
- Beatty, P.C.: Cognitive Interviewing: The Use of Cognitive Interviews to Evaluate ePRO Instruments; in: Tiplady, B: ePro: Electronic Solutions for Patient-Reported Data, edited by B. Byrom, Routledge, London, UK, 2010, p. 2–48.
- Office of Management and Budget: Statistical Policy Directive No. 2: Standards and Guidelines for Statistical Surveys; Addendum: Standards and Guidelines for Cognitive Interviews; 2016, 70586-70587 pp., Fed. Reg. 81 FR 70586.
- Willis, G.B.: Cognitive Interviewing: A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design; Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2004, 352 p. ISBN: 0-7169-2803-0
- Brown, G.T.L., L.R. Harris, C. O’Quin, and K.E. Lane: Using Multi-Group Confirmatory Factor Analysis to Evaluate Cross-Cultural Research: Identifying and Understanding Non-Invariance; Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 40 (2017) 66–90. DOI: 10.1080/1743727X.2015.1070823
- Leonidou, C., E. Charalambous, M.P. Michaelides, and G. Panayiotou: Smoking Consequences Questionnaire: Factor Structure and Invariance among Smokers and Non-Smokers; Subst. Use Misuse 54 (2019) 46–56. DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1491053
- Richardson, C.G., J.L. Johnson, P.A. Ratner, and B.D. Zumbo: The Influence of Web-Versus Paper-Based Formats on the Assessment of Tobacco Dependence: Evaluating the Measurement Invariance of the Dimensions of Tobacco Dependence Scale; Subst. Abuse 3 (2009) 1–14. DOI: 10.4137/sart.S960
- Brown, T.A.: Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research; 2nd edition, Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA, 2015, p. 462. ISBN: 978-1-4625-1536-3
- Hair Jr, J.F., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, and R.E. Anderson: Multivariate Data Analysis; 8th edition, Cengage, Andover, UK, 2019, p. 813. ISBN: 978-1-4737-5654-0
- Ebbert, J.O., C.A. Patten, and D.R. Schroeder: The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence-Smokeless Tobacco (FTND-ST); Addict. Behav. 31 (2006) 1716–1721. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.12.015
- Morean, M.E.: Psychometric Evaluation of the Modified E-Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire for Use with High School Adolescents and Young Adults; Nicotine Tob. Res. 26 (2024) 1420–1428. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntae076
- Morean, M.E. and K.W. Bold: The Modified E-Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire: Psychometric Evaluation of an Adapted Version of the Modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire for Use with Adults Who Use Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems; Nicotine Tob. Res. 24 (2022) 1396–1404. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntac062
- Strong, D.R., J. Pearson, S. Ehlke, T. Kirchner, D. Abrams, K. Taylor, W.M. Compton, K.P. Conway, E. Lambert, V.R. Green, L.C. Hull, S.E. Evans, K.M. Cummings, M. Goniewicz, A. Hyland, and R. Niaura: Indicators of Dependence for Different Types of Tobacco Product Users: Descriptive Findings from Wave 1 (2013–2014) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study; Drug Alcohol Depend. 178 (2017) 257–266. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.05.010
- Acquadro, C., K. Conway, C. Giroudet, and I. Mear: Linguistic Validation Manual for Health Outcome Assessments; Mapi Research Institute: Lyon, France, 2012.
- Anfray, C., B. Arnold, M. Martin, S. Eremenco, D.L. Patrick, K. Conway, C. Acquadro: Reflection Paper on Copyright, Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments and Their Translations; Health Qual. Life Outcomes 16 (2018) 224. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-018-1050-4
- Regnault, A. and M. Herdman: Using Quantitative Methods within the Universalist Model Framework to Explore the Cross-Cultural Equivalence of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments; Qual. Life Res. 24 (2015) 115–124. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0722-8
- Wild, D., S. Eremenco, I. Mear, M. Martin, C. Houchin, M. Gawlicki, A. Hareendran, I. Wiklund, L.Y. Chong, R. von Maltzahn, L. Cohen, and E. Molsen: Multinational Trials-Recommendations on the Translations Required, Approaches to Using the Same Language in Different Countries, and the Approaches to Support Pooling the Data: The ISPOR Patient-Reported Outcomes Translation and Linguistic Validation Good Research Practices Task Force Report; Value Health 12 (2009) 430–440. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00471.x
- Wild, D., A. Grove, M. Martin, S. Eremenco, S. McElroy, A. Verjee-Lorenz, and P. Erikson: Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: Report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation; Value Health 8 (2005) 94–104. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
- Acquadro, C., D.L. Patrick, S. Eremenco, M.L. Martin, D. Kulis, H. Correia, and K. Conway: Emerging Good Practices for Translatability Assessment (TA) of Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) Measures; J. Patient Rep. Outcomes 2 (2017) 8. DOI: 10.1186/s41687-018-0035-8
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER): Patient-Focused Drug Development: Collecting Comprehensive and Representative Input; FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2020. Available at:
https://www.fda.gov/media/139088/download (accessed July 21, 2025) - Patrick, D.L., L.B. Burke, C.J. Gwaltney, N.K. Leidy, M.L. Martin, E. Molsen, and L. Ring: Content Validity–Establishing and Reporting the Evidence in Newly Developed Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Instruments for Medical Product Evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force Report: Part 1–Eliciting Concepts for a New Pro Instrument; Value Health 14 (2011) 967–977. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.014
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Patient-Focused Drug Development: Selecting, Developing, or Modifying Fit-for-Purpose Clinical Outcome Assessments; Draft Guidance for Industry, Food and Drug Administration Staff, and Other Stakeholders; Availability, FDA, 2022. Available at:
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2022/06/30/2022-13952/patient-focused-drug-development-selecting-developing-or-modifying-fit-for-purpose-clinical-outcome (accessed July 2025) - Afolalu, E.F., T. Salzberger, L. Abetz-Webb, S. Cano, R. Weitkunat, J.E. Rose, and C. Chrea: Development and Initial Validation of a New Self-Report Measure to Assess Perceived Dependence on Tobacco and Nicotine Products; Sci. Rep. 14 (2024) 10098. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-60790-4
- Afolalu, E.F., E. Spies, A. Bacso, E. Clerc, L. Abetz-Webb, S. Gallot, and C. Chrea: Impact of Tobacco and/or Nicotine Products on Health and Functioning: A Scoping Review and Findings from the Preparatory Phase of the Development of a New Self-Report Measure; Harm Reduct. J. 18 (2021) 79. DOI: 10.1186/s12954-021-00526-z
- DeVellis, R.F. and C.T. Thorpe: Scale Development: Theory and Applications; 2nd edition, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2021, p. 320. ISBN: 154437934X
- Kline, P.: A Handbook of Test Construction: Introduction to Psychometric Design; Routledge, London, UK, 2015, p. 274. ISBN: 9781138905122
- Fowler Jr, F.J.: Improving Survey Questions: Design and Evaluation; Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1995, p. 200. ISBN: 9780803945838
- Brod, M., L.E. Tesler, and T.L. Christensen: Qualitative Research and Content Validity: Developing Best Practices Based on Science and Experience; Qual. Life Res. 18 (2009) 1263–1278. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-009-9540-9
- Netemeyer, R., W. Bearden, and S. Sharma: Scaling Procedures; Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2003. DOI: 10.4135/9781412985772. Available at:
https://methods.sagepub.com/book/scaling-procedures (accessed July 2025) - Birnbaum, A: Some Latent Trait Models and Their Use in Inferring an Examinee’s Ability; in: Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores, edited by F.M. Lord and M.R. Novick, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA, 1968, pp. 397–479.
- Embretson, S.E. and S.P. Reise: Item Response Theory; Psychology Press, New York, NY, USA, 2013, p. 384. DOI: 10.4324/9781410605269
- Rasch, G: Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests; University of Chicago Press; Chicago, IL, USA, 1980, p. 199. ISBN: 9780226705538.
- Andrich, D: Rasch Models for Measurement. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1988, p. 199. Available at:
https://methods.sagepub.com/book/rasch-models-for-measurement (accessed July 2025). - Bond, T: Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences; 3rd edition, Routledge, New York, NY, USA, 2015, p. 406. DOI: 10.4324/9781315814698
- Furr, R.M.: Psychometrics: An Introduction; Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2021, p. 704. ISBN: 978-1071824092
- Bandalos, D.L.: Measurement Theory and Applications for the Social Sciences; The Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA, 2018, p. 661. ISBN: 9781462532131
- Cano, S., C. Chrea, T. Salzberger, T. Alfieri, G. Emilien, N. Mainy, A. Ramazzotti, F. Lüdicke, and R. Weitkunat: Development and Validation of a New Instrument to Measure Perceived Risks Associated with the Use of Tobacco and Nicotine-Containing Products; Health Qual. Life Outcomes 16 (2018) 192. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-018-0997-5
- McCaffrey, S.A., J.P. Zdinak, S. Plunkett, E. Becker, J.N. Lewis, and R.A. Black: Development and Validation of Behavioral Intention Measures of an E-Vapor Product: Intention to Try, Use, Dual Use, and Switch; Health Qual. Life Outcomes 19 (2021) 123. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01764-2
- Morean, M.E., S. Krishnan-Sarin, S. Sussman, J. Foulds, H. Fishbein, R. Grana, B. Halpern-Felsher, H. Kim, S.R. Weaver, and S.S. O’Malley: Development and Psychometric Validation of a Novel Measure of Sensory Expectancies Associated with E-Cigarette Use; Addict. Behav. 91 (2019) 208–215. DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.08.031
- Shiffman, S., S.A. McCaffrey, M.J. Hannon, N.I. Goldenson, and R.A. Black: A New Questionnaire to Assess Respiratory Symptoms (The Respiratory Symptom Experience Scale): Quantitative Psychometric Assessment and Validation Study; JMIR Form. Res. 7 (2023) e44036. DOI: 10.2196/44036
- McCaffrey, S., E. Afolalu, C. Chrea, T. Salzberger, S. Shiffman, L. Giles, D. Nishihara, M. Sarkar, K. Prasad, M. Shetty, and R. Black: Technical Report - Best Practices and Guidelines with Respect to Psychometric CROM for Use in Research on Tobacco and Nicotine Containing Products; CORESTA, Paris, France, 2024.
- Wei, L., M. Sarkar, E. Clerc, C. Chrea, S. McCaffrey, N. Goldenson, K. Prasad, and M. Shetty: Technical Report - Best Practices and Guidelines with Respect to Descriptive CROM for Research on Tobacco and Nicotine Containing Products; CORESTA, Paris, France, 2024.