Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Boosting Scientific Creativity Among Researchers: How Efficient are Creativity Trainings? Cover

Boosting Scientific Creativity Among Researchers: How Efficient are Creativity Trainings?

Open Access
|Aug 2024

References

  1. Alves-Oliveira, P., Arriaga, P., Xavier, C., Hoffman, G., & Paiva, A. (2022). Creativity landscapes: Systematic review spanning 70 years of creativity interventions for children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(1), 16–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.514
  2. Anders, K., & Walsh, E. (2009). Encouraging creativity in PhD and postdoc researchers: a guide for supervisors and principal investigators. Imperial College London.
  3. Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1996.tb00767.x
  4. Bartoš, F., Maier, M., Shanks, D.R., Stanley, T.D., Sladekova, M., & Wagenmakers, E.J. (2023). Meta-analyses in psychology often overestimate evidence for and size of effects. Royal Society Open Science, 10(7), 230224. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230224
  5. Ben-Soussan, T.D., Berkovich-Ohana, A., Piervincenzi, C., Glicksohn, J., & Carducci, F. (2015). Embodied cognitive flexibility and neuroplasticity following Quadrato Motor Training. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01021
  6. Bi, H., Mi, S., Lu, S., & Hu, X. (2020). Meta-analysis of interventions and their effectiveness in students’ scientific creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100750
  7. Bonetto, E., & Arciszewski, T. (2023). One “C” to Rule Them All: The Psychology of Creativity Needs to Refocus on Behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.590
  8. Bonetto, E., Pichot, N., & Adam-Troïan, J. (2022). The role of cultural values in national-level innovation: Evidence from 106 countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 56(4), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971221078087
  9. Bonetto, E., Pichot, N., Guiller, T., & Arciszewski, T. (2022). The Structure of Creative Revolutions. Creativity. Theories–Research–Applications, 10(1–2), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2023-0003
  10. Bonetto, E., Pichot, N., Pavani, J.B., & Adam-Troïan, J. (2020). Creative individuals are social risk-takers: Relationships between creativity, social risk-taking and fear of negative evaluations. Creativity. Theories–Research–Applications, 7(2), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0016
  11. Bonnardel, N., & Pichot, N. (2020). Enhancing collaborative creativity with virtual dynamic personas. Applied ergonomics, 82, 102949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102949
  12. Button, K.S., Ioannidis, J.P., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B.A., Flint, J., Robinson, E.S., & Munafò, M.R. (2013). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature reviews neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475
  13. Byrge, C., & Hansen, S. (2013). Course in new thinking in higher education: Enhancing creativity through the means of training, theory and workshop. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 51, 18–32.
  14. Calver, N. (2013). Sir Peter Medawar: science, creativity and the popularization of Karl Popper. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 67(4), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2013.0022
  15. Cohen J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). Academic Press.
  16. Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
  17. de Vries, H.B., & Lubart, T.I. (2019). Scientific creativity: divergent and convergent thinking and the impact of culture. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.184
  18. Dovha, M.I., Antonenko, P.D., Shapovalov, Y.B., Lytovchenko, D.S., & Halchenko, M.S. (2023). Developing and evaluating the effectiveness of a pilot online course for creativity development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09852-8
  19. Dutton, D., & Krausz, M. (2014). The concept of creativity in science and art (Vol. 6). Springer.
  20. Cropley, A.J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using?. Roeper review, 23(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554069
  21. Ellwood, S., Pallier, G., Snyder, A., & Gallate, J. (2009). The incubation effect: hatching a solution?. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633368
  22. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  23. Feldhusen, J.F., & Goh, B.E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 231–247.
  24. Foster, E.D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). JMLA. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203–206. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88
  25. Funder, D.C., & Ozer, D.J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202
  26. Gobet, F., & Sala, G. (2023). Cognitive training: A field in search of a phenomenon. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221091830
  27. Grosul, M., & Feist, G. (2014). The Creative Person in Science. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034828
  28. Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454.
  29. Haase, J., Hanel, P.H.P., & Gronau, N. (2023). Creativity enhancement methods for adults: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000557
  30. Haslam, S.A., Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Jans, L. (2013). The collective origins of valued originality: A social identity approach to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(4), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313498001
  31. Hemlin, S., Allwood, C.M., & Martin, B.R. (Eds.). (2004). Creative knowledge environments: The influences on creativity in research and innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  32. Hemlin, S., Allwood, C.M., & Martin, B.R. (2008). Creative knowledge environments. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802060018
  33. Hemlin, S., & Olsson, L. (2011). Creativity-Stimulating Leadership: A Critical Incident Study of Leaders’ Influence on Creativity in Research Groups. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00585.x
  34. Higuchi, T., Miyata, K., & Yuizono, T. (2012, November). Creativity improvement by idea-marathon training, measured by torrance tests of creative thinking (TTCT) and its applications to laboratories. 2012 Seventh International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems. IEEE. Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
  35. Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., & Kaufman, J.C. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The journal of creative behavior, 47(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20
  36. Im, H., Hokanson, B., & Johnson, K.K. (2015). Teaching creative thinking skills: A longitudinal study. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 33(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X15569010
  37. Jenaro-Río, C., Castaño-Calle, R., & García-Perez Omaña, A. (2019). La experiencia de un taller para el fomento de la creatividad en niños de Primaria [A workshop experience for the promotion of creativity in primary school children]. Arte, individuo y sociedad, 31(4), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.5209/aris.60841
  38. Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J.C. (Eds.). (2017). The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity. Academic Press.
  39. Karwowski, M., & Soszynski, M. (2008). How to develop creative imagination?: Assumptions, aims and effectiveness of Role Play Training in Creativity (RPTC). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.07.001
  40. Kaufman, S.B., Quilty, L.C., Grazioplene, R.G., Hirsh, J.B., Gray, J.R., Peterson, J.B., & DeYoung, C.G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of personality, 84(2), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12156
  41. Kim, J. (2015). Physical activity benefits creativity: squeezing a ball for enhancing creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1087258
  42. Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. Macmillan.
  43. Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
  44. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
  45. Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D., Tian, A.W., Newman, A., & Knight, C. (2020). Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1661837
  46. Lucchiari, C., Sala, P.M., & Vanutelli, M.E. (2019). The effects of a cognitive pathway to promote class creative thinking. An experimental study on Italian primary school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.002
  47. Ma, H.H. (2006). A synthetic analysis of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 435–446.
  48. Marcos, R.I.S., Fernández, V.L., González, M.T.D., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100663
  49. Marope, M., Griffin, P., & Gallagher, C. (2017). Future competences and the future of curriculum: A global reference for curricula transformation. International Bureau of Education (UNESCO).
  50. Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Millsap, R.E. (2009). The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology. Sage.
  51. McKiernan, E.C., Bourne, P.E., Brown, C.T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., … & Yarkoni, T. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. elife, 5, e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800.001
  52. Medawar, P.B. (1990). The threat and the glory: reflections on science and scientists. Harper Collins.
  53. Medawar, P.B. (2021). The art of the soluble. Routledge.
  54. OECD. (2023). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/sti/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook-25186167.htm
  55. Oppezzo, M., & Schwartz, D.L. (2014). Give your ideas some legs: the positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 40(4), 1142–1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036577
  56. Parnes, S.J., & Brunelle, E.A. (1967). The literature of creativity (part I). The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 52–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00010.x
  57. Pichot, N., Bonetto, E., Pavani, J.B., Arciszewski, T., Bonnardel, N., & Weisberg, R.W. (2022). The construct validity of creativity: empirical arguments in favor of novelty as the basis for creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 34(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1997176
  58. Phillips, A.M., Watkins, J., & Hammer, D. (2017). Problematizing as a scientific endeavor. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020107
  59. Qian, M., Plucker, J.A., & Yang, X. (2019). Is creativity domain specific or domain general? Evidence from multilevel explanatory item response theory models. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100571
  60. Qiang, R., Han, Q., Guo, Y., Bai, J., & Karwowski, M. (2020). Critical Thinking Disposition and Scientific Creativity: The Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.347
  61. Raj, H., & Saxena, D.R. (2016). Scientific creativity: A review of researches. European Academic Research, 4(2), 1122–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100571
  62. Ritter, S.M., Gu, X., Crijns, M., & Biekens, P. (2020). Fostering students’ creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program. PloS one, 15(3), e0229773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229773
  63. Ritter, S.M., & Mostert, N. (2017). Enhancement of creative thinking skills using a cognitive-based creativity training. Journal of Cognitive enhancement, 1, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3
  64. Rose, L.H., & Lin, H.T. (1984). A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 18(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1984.tb00985.x
  65. Ruiz-del-Pino, B., Fernández-Martín, F.D., & Arco-Tirado, J.L. (2022). Creativity training programs in primary education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101172
  66. Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity research journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
  67. Said-Metwaly, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Methodological issues in measuring creativity: A systematic literature review. Creativity. Theories–Research–Applications, 4(2), 276–301. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0014
  68. Scope, E.E. (1998). Meta-analysis of research on creativity: The effects of instructional variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fordham University, New York.
  69. Scott, G., Leritz, L.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2004a). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity research journal, 16(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534549
  70. Scott, G., Leritz, L.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2004b). Types of creativity training: Approaches and their effectiveness. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(3), 149–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2004.tb01238.x
  71. Shavinina, L.V. (2013). The Routledge international handbook of innovation education. Routledge.
  72. Sherwood, D. (2022). Creativity for Scientists and Engineers. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-4967-3
  73. Siew, N.M., & Ambo, N. (2018). Development and Evaluation of an Integrated Project-Based and STEM Teaching and Learning Module on Enhancing Scientific Creativity among Fifth Graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1017–1033.
  74. Silvia, P.J., Christensen, A.P., & Cotter, K.N. (2016). Commentary: The development of creativity—Ability, motivation, and potential. In B. Barbot (Ed.), Perspectives on creativity development. New directions for child and adolescent development, 151 (pp. 111–119). Wiley Periodicals, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20147
  75. Simonton, D.K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge University Press.
  76. Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2019). Using computer-based cognitive mapping to improve students’ divergent thinking for creativity development. British journal of educational technology, 50(5), 2217–2233. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12825
  77. Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682
  78. Toumi, K., Girandola, F., & Bonnardel, N. (2021). Technologies for supporting creativity in design: A view of physical and virtual environments with regard to cognitive and social processes. Creativity: Theories– Research–Applications, 8(1), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2021-0012
  79. Torrance, E.P. (1972a). Can we teach children to think creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114–143.
  80. Torrance, E.P. (1972b). Predictive validity of the torrance tests of creative thinking. The Journal of creative behavior, 6(4), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x
  81. Tsai, K.C. (2013). A review of the effectiveness of creative training on adult learners. Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(1), 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jsss.v1i1.4329
  82. United Nations (2023). Peace, dignity and equality on a healthy planet. Global issues. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues
  83. Valgeirsdottir, D., & Onarheim, B. (2017). Studying creativity training programs: A methodological analysis. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(4), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12245
  84. Warnick, B.J., Kier, A.S., LaFrance, E.M., & Cuttler, C. (2021). Head in the clouds? Cannabis users’ creativity in new venture ideation depends on their entrepreneurial passion and experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(2), 106088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106088
  85. Watts, L.L., Steele, L.M., & Song, H. (2017). Re-examining the relationship between need for cognition and creativity: Predicting creative problem solving across multiple domains. Creativity Research Journal, 29(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1263505
  86. Weisberg, R., Pichot, N., Bonetto, E., Pavani, J.B., Arciszewski, T., & Bonnardel, N. (2021). From explicit to implicit theories of creativity and back: The relevance of naive criteria in defining creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 839–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.492
  87. Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M.H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149
  88. Yasin, R.M., & Yunus, N.S.R. (2014). A meta-analysis study on the effectiveness of creativity approaches in technology and engineering education. Asian Social Science, 10(3), 242–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n3p242
Language: English
Page range: 100 - 113
Submitted on: Nov 14, 2023
|
Accepted on: Jun 9, 2024
|
Published on: Aug 12, 2024
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Eric Bonetto, Thomas Arciszewski, Nicolas Pichot, Jean-Baptiste Pavani, Théo Guiller, Fabien Girandola, Nathalie Bonnardel, published by University of Białystok
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.