Who are Lead users?

Boisadan, Andréa; Buisine, Stéphanie

doi:10.2478/ctra-2023-0004

Abstract

Lead users are invaluable resources to generate user-centric radical innovation, but they remain difficult to detect and recruit in the general population. Lead userness, which draws both on the ability to identify unstated customer needs and find creative solutions to those needs, has been conceptualized as domain-dependent: this means that a lead user may generate innovation only in a specific domain for which they are an expert. In the present study, we aim to better understand the extent to which lead userness is a domain-dependent state (as elaborated in the literature) or a domain-independent trait. Following a questionnaire survey with 126 participants, we managed to reliably assess the empathetic side of lead userness (ability to identify needs) and showed that it was related both to domain-dependent characteristics (competences) and domain-independent trait (emotional intelligence). These results open up new avenues for implementing the lead user method in innovation projects.

References

Amabile, T. (1985). Motivation and Creativity: effects of Motivational orientation on Creative Writers. Journal of Personality and social Psychology, 48(2), 393–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baer, J. (2015). The Importance of Domain-Specific Expertise in Creativity. Roeper Review, 37(3), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2015.1047480
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
BarOn, R., & Parker, J.D.A. (2000). The Handbook of Emotional Intelligence: Theory, Development, Assessment, and Application At Home, School, and in the Workplace. Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Company.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barron, F. (1955). The disposition towards originality. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 478–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048073
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Baruch, O.K. (2017). Big Five Personnality and Creativity: The Moderating Effect of Motivational Goal orientation. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(3), 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.183
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boisadan, A., Buisine, S., & Moreau, P. (2021). Towards the design of a quick and universal questionnaire to assess the intuitiveness of products. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 22, 753–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2021.1876177
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Boisadan, A., Buisine, S., Moreau, P., & Boumenir, Y. (2020). Designing universal visuotactile pictograms for orientation maps. Journal of Accessibility and Design for All, 10, 31–69. https://doi.org/10.17411/jacces.v10i1.219
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buisine, S., Boisadan, A., Richir, S. (2018). L’innovation radicale par la méthode de l’utilisateur extraordinaire. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 24, 374–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pto.2017.11.001
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Buisine, S., Taton, A., & Boisadan, A. (2021). Need-seeking: Creating, discovering or recovering needs? In N.L.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Black et al. (Eds), Proceedings of IEA 2021 Triennal Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, LNNS 219, p. 624–630.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Christensen, C. (1997 first edition – 2016 last edition). The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business Review Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Clark, R., & DeYoung, C. (2014). Creativity and the aspects of neuroticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, S54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.07.224
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Conner, T.S., & Silvia, P.J. (2015). Creative days: A daily diary study of emotion, personality, and everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 463–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000022
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cook, D.A, & Artino, A.R. (2016). Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Eisenberg, I. (2011). Lead user Research for Breakthrough Innovation. Research-Technology Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2011.11657673
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Faullant, R., Schwarz, E.J., Krajger, I., & Breitenecker, R.J. (2012). Towards a Comprehensive Understanding of Lead Userness: The Search for Individual Creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00626.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Feist, G.J. (1998). A Meta-Analysis of Personality in Scientific and Artistic Creativity. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Franke, N., von Hippel, E., & Schreier, M. (2006). Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead-User Theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2006.00203.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fürst, G., Barbot, B., & Lubart, T. (2023). Créativité et personnalité. In N. Bonnardel, F. Girandola, E. Bonetto & T. Lubart (Eds.), La créativité en situations (pp. 86–100). Dunod.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fürst, G., & Lubart, T. (2017). An integrative approach to the creative personality: Beyond the big five paradigm. In G.J. Feist, R. Reiter-Palmon, & J.C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research (pp. 140–164). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316228036.009
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Geher, G., Bettancourt, K., & Jewell, O. (2017). The Link between Emotional Intelligence and Creativity? Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0276236617710029
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
George, J.M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Goldberg, L.R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216–1229. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.6.1216
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ioannidou, F., & Konstantikaki, V. (2008). Empathy and emotional intelligence: What it is really about? International Journal of Caring Sciences, 1(3), 118–123.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ivcevic, Z., & Brackett, M.A. (2015). Predicting creativity: Interactive effects of openness to experience and emotion regulation ability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 9, 480–487. https://doi.org/10.1037/A0039826
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Jaruzelski, B., Staack, V., et Goehle, B. (2014). Proven paths to innovation success. Strategy Business, 77, 2–16.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
John, O.P., Donahue, E.M., & Kentle, R.L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory–Versions 4a and 54. University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Johnson, J.A. (2017). Big-Five model. In V. Zeigler-Hill, T.K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (pp. 1–16). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_1212-1
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kaufman, J.C., & Beghetto, R.A. (2009). Beyond bid and little: the four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013688
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Koning, C.C. (2016). Identifying lead users through a personality characteristics survey. (Bachelor’s thesis, University of Twente).
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kratzer, J., Lettl, C., Franke, N., et Gloor, P.A. (2016). The Social Network Position of Lead Users. Journal of product innovation management, 33(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12291
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kreuzig, H.W. (1981). Über den Zugang zu komplexen Problemlösen mittels prozeßorientierter kognitiver Persönlichkeitsmerkmale. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 28, 294–308.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lehnen, J., & Herstatt, C. (2016). Thirty years lead user research – an empirical study of its implementation level in business practice. https://oui2016.exordo.com/files/papers/130/initial_draft/Thirty_years_lead_user_research_Lehnen_Herstatt.pdf
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lilien, G., Morrison, P.D., Saerls, K., Sonnack, M., et von Hippel, E. (2001). Performance Assessment of the Lead User idea Generation Process for New Product Development. ISBM Report 4-2001.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité. Armand Colin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lubart, T., Mouchiroud, C., Tordjman, S., & Zenasni, F. (2015). Psychologie de la créativité, 2nd ed. Armand Colin.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lüthje, C. (2000). Kundenorientierung im Innovationsprozess. Universitäts-Verlag, Wiesbaden.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Martin, A., Agnoletti, M.F., & Brangier, E. (2021). Ordinary users, precursory users and experts in the anticipation of future needs: Evaluation of their contribution in the elaboration of new needs in energy for housing. Applied Ergonomics, 94(3), 103394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103394
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Morrison, P.D., Roberts, J.H., & Midgley, D.F. (2004). The Nature of Lead Users and Measurement of Leading Edge Status. Research Policy, 33, 351–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.007
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pajo, S., Verhaegen, P-A., Vandevenne, D., & Duflou, J.R. (2015). Fast Lead User Identification Framework. Procedia Engineering, 131, 1140–1145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.12.434
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Puryear, J.S., Kettler, T., & Rinn, A.N. (2017). Relating personality and creativity: Considering what and how we measure. Journal of Creative Behavior.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rogers, E.M (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.). The Free Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Ryan, R.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Salovey, P., & Mayer, J.D. (1990). Emotional Intelligence. Imagination. Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211. https://doi.org/10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schreier, M., & Prügl, R.J. (2008) Extending Lead-User Theory: Antecedents and Consequences of Consumers’ Lead Userness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25, 331–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00305.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schreier, M., Oberhauser, S., & Prügl, R. (2007. Lead Users and the Adoption and Diffusion of New Products: Insights from Two Extreme Sports Communities. Marketing Letters, 18, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11002-006-9009-3
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schutte, N.S., Malouff, J.M., Hall, L.E., Haggerty, D.J., Cooper, J.T., Golden, C.J., & Dornheim, L. (1998). Development and validation of a measure of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 167–177.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Schweizer, T.S. (2006). The Psychology of Novelty-Seeking, Creativity and Innovation: Neurocognitive Aspects Within a Work-Psychological Perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 15(2), 164–172.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Soukhoroukova, A., Spann, M., & et Skiera, B. (2012). Sourcing, Filtering, and Evaluating New Product Ideas: An Empirical Exploration of the Performance of Idea Markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 100–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00881.x
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Steele, L., McIntosh, T., & Higgs, C. (2017). Intrinsic motivation and creativity: Opening up a black box. In M. D. Mumford, & S. Hemlin (Eds.), Hanbook of research and leadership (pp. 100–130). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781784715465
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Story, M., Mueller, J., & Mace, M. (1998). Designing for People of all Ages and Abilities. North Carolina State University, The Center for Universal Design.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
von Hippel, E. (1988). The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. MIT Press.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
von Hippel, E.,Thomke,S., & Sonnack, M. (1999). Creating breakthroughs at 3M. Harvard Business Review, 77, 47–57.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Who are Lead users?

Abstract

Paradigm

My account