References
- Adler, J. (2000). Conceptualising resources as a theme for teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 3(3), 205–224.
- Akkerman, S.F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary Crossing and Boundary Objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
- Arias, E., Eden, H., Fischer, G., Gorman, A., & Scharff, E. (2000). Transcending the individual human mind— creating shared understanding through collaborative design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 7(1), 84–113.
- Bakker, A., & Akkerman, S.F. (2014). A boundary-crossing approach to support students’ integration of statistical and work-related knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 86(2), 223–237.
- Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review. http://surreycreativeacademy.pbworks.com/f/Design+Thinking+Tim+Brown.pdf
- Cantor, A., DeLauer, V., Martin, D., & Rogan, J. (2015). Training interdisciplinary “wicked problem” solvers: Applying lessons from HERO in community-based research experiences for undergraduates. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 39(3), 407–419.
- Clinton, G., & Hokanson, B. (2012). Creativity in the training and practice of instructional designers: the Design/Creativity Loops model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 111–130.
- Conklin, J. (2005). Wicked Problems & Social Complexity. Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. Wiley.
- Coyne, R. (2005). Wicked problems revisited. Design Studies, 26, 5–17.
- Darbellay, F., Moody, Z., & Lubart, T. (Eds.). (2017). Creativity, design thinking and interdisciplinarity. Springer: Singapore.
- Daskolia, M., & Kynigos, C. (2012). Applying a Constructionist Frame to Learning about Sustainability. Creative Education, 3, 818–823.
- Daskolia, M., Dimos, A., Kampylis, P. (2012). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of creative thinking within the context of Environmental Education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 7(2), 269–290.
- Daskolia, M., Kolovou, A., & Kynigos, C. (2016). Social Creativity in the Design of Digital Resources. Interweaving Math with Environmental Education. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (pp. 134–143).
- Daskolia, M., Kynigos, C., & Kolovou, A. (2018). Addressing Creativity in the Collaborative Design of Digital Books for Environmental and Math Education. In Research on e-Learning and ICT in Education (pp. 69–86). Springer, Cham.
- Drenth, D., Elahi, S., König, A. (2017). Exploring alternative futures with scenarios. In A. König, A., & J. Ravetz, (Eds.), Sustainability science: Key issues (pp. 113–132). Routledge.
- Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133–156.
- Engeström, Y., Engeström, R., & Kärkkäinen, M. (1995). Polycontextuality and boundary crossing in expert cognition: Learning and problem solving in complex work activities. Learning and instruction.
- Fischer, G. (2004). Social creativity: turning barriers into opportunities for collaborative design. In Proceedings of the 8th conference on Participatory design “Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices”, v. 1 (pp. 152–161).
- Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., & Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond binary choices: Integrating individual and social creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4–5), 482–512.
- Fischer, G. (2013), Social creativity and cultures of participation: Bringing cultures of creativity alive. Billund: The LEGO Foundation. Available from: www.legofoundation.com
- Funtowicz, S.O., & Ravetz, J.R. (1993). The emergence of post-normal science. In Science, politics and morality (pp. 85–123). Springer: Dordrecht.
- Gibson R., & Fox M. (2013). Simple, Complex and Wicked Problems. http://mofox.com/pdf/simple,complex,wicked.pdf
- Gueudet, G., & Trouche, L. (2009). Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 199–218.
- Gustafson, K.L., & Branch, R.M. (1997). Revisioning models of instructional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 73–89.
- Hansen, G., & Stone, D. (2016). Assessing the observed impact of anthropogenic climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(5), 532–537.
- Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: Understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge University Press.
- Incropera, F.P. (2015). Climate Change: A Wicked Problem—Complexity and Uncertainly at the Intersection of Science, Economics, Politics and Human Behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Kagawa, F., & Selby, D. (Eds.). (2010). Education and Climate Change: Living and Learning in Interesting Times. Routledge.
- Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127–140.
- Kynigos, C., & Kalogeria, E. (2012). Boundary crossing through in-service online mathematics teacher education: the case of scenarios and half-baked microworlds. ZDM, 44(6), 733–745.
- Kynigos, C., & Kolovou, A. (2018). Teachers as designers of digital educational resources for creative mathematical thinking. In Research on Mathematics Textbooks and Teachers’ Resources (pp. 145–164). Springer, Cham.
- Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. CambridgeQ: Cambridge University Press.
- Lazarus, R. (2009). Super Wicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future. Cornell Law Review, 94(5), 1153–1233.
- Lehtonen, A., Salonen, A.O., & Cantell, H. (2019). Climate change education: A new approach for a world of wicked problems. In Sustainability, human well-being, and the future of education (pp. 339–374). Pal-grave Macmillan, Cham.
- Murgatroyd, S. (2010). Wicked problems’ and the work of the school. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 259–279.
- Newman-Storen, R. (2014). Leadership in sustainability: Creating an interface between creativity and leadership theory in dealing with “Wicked Problems”. Sustainability, 6(9), 5955–5967.
- Palmer, J.M., Smith, T., Willetts, J.R., & Mitchell, C.A. (2009). Creativity, ethics and transformation: Key factors in a transdisciplinary application of systems methodology to resolving wicked problems in sustainability. Systemic development: Local solutions in a global environment, 1, 69–71.
- Remillard, J.T. (2005). Examining key concepts in research on teachers’ use of mathematics curricula. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 211–246.
- Rittel, Horst W. J. & Webber, Melvin M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
- Seels, B.A., & Glasgow, Z. (1998). Making instructional design decisions (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Sharp, E.L., Fagan, J., Kah, M., McEntee, M., & Salmond, J. (2021). Hopeful approaches to teaching and learning environmental “wicked problems”. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 1–19.
- Star, S.L., & Griesemer, J.R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.
- Thofson, K.K.H. (2010). The wicked problem and the instructional designer: Recognition of and approaches to wicked problems in instructional design practice. Doctoral dissertation, Capella University.
- UNESCO (2017). Changing Minds, not the Climate: The Role of Education. Paris: UNESCO.
- Wals, A. E. (2015). Beyond unreasonable doubt. Education and learning for socio-ecological sustainability in the Anthropocene. Wageningen University.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems thinker, 9(5), 2–3.