Bioethics in the Anthropocene: A powerful tool for sustainable development and planetary co-responsibility
References
- Alvarado, G.; Ochoa, M., and Partidas, G. 2016. Una metodología para discutir dilemas éticos. Educaci ó n Superior y Sociedad (ESS), 17(17), 113-133. https://ess.iesalc.unesco.org/index.php/ess3/article/view/126
- Alvarez, A. 2022. Exploring the ‘other’ role of philosophy in bioethics: The case of addressing moral distress and rediscovering meaning and purpose. The American Journal of Bioethics, 22(12), 67-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2022.2134495
- Anderson, W. 2023. Toward Planetary Health Ethics? Refiguring Bios in Bioethics. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 20, 695 702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-023-10285-0
- Ara ú jo Gomes da Silva, AC.; Teixeira Junior, G.; de Campos, LMC.; Bulc ã o-Neto, RF. and Graciano Neto, VV. 2025. Systems-of-Systems for Environmental Sustainability: A Systematic Mapping Study. arXiv e-prints, arXiv-2502.
- Arras, JD. 2017. Principles and particularity: the roles of cases in bioethics. In Ethics and Medical Decision-Making (pp. 99-130). Routledge. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1621&context=ilj
- Arroyo, FA. and Avil é s, NV. 2000. El consentimiento informado, práctica bioética fundamental en la medicina moderna. Revista Facultad de Ciencias M é dicas. Vol 25. N2.
- Bardin, L. 2011. Análise de conteúdo [Content analysis]. São Paulo: Edições 70.
- Beauchamp, TL. and Childress, JF. 1994. Principles of biomedical ethics. Edicoes Loyola.
- Botbol-Baum, M. 2015. Epistemology of bioethics in the making: from historical context to conceptual plurality and anticipation. Bioethics Update, 1(2), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioet.2015.12.002
- Boychenko, N. 2023. Principlism in bioethics: features and possible limitations.
- Blumenthal-Barby, J.; Aas, S.; Brudney, D.; Flanigan, J.; Liao, SM.; London, A.; Sumner, W.; and Savulescu, J. 2022. The place of philosophy in bioethics today. The American Journal of Bioethics, 22(12), 10-21. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:aae2ee05-8204-475e-a92c-3d37fbcc64b2/files/r5138jf17w
- Burgui, MB. 2015. Hans Jonas: Conservación de la naturaleza, conservación de la vida Cuadernos de bioética, 26(2), 253-266. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/875/87541128006.pdf
- Cavalcante, E.; Batista, T. and Oquendo, F. 2024. Looking back and forward: A retrospective and future directions on software engineering for systems-of-systems. Journal of Software: Evolution and Process, 36(10), e2697.
- Carvalho, AS. and Ramalho-Santos, J. 2013. How can ethics relate to science? The case of stem cell research. European journal of human genetics, 21(6), 591-595.
- Casas Mart í nez, MDLL. 2008. Introducción a la metodología de la investigación en bioética: sugerencias para el desarrollo de un protocolo de investigación cualitativa interdisciplinaria. Acta bioethica, 14(1), 97-105. https://www.scielo.cl/pdf/abioeth/v14n1/art13.pdf
- Collado, J. 2016. La bioética como ciencia transdisciplinar de la complejidad: una introducción coevolutiva desde la Gran Historia. Revista Colombiana de Bio é tica, 11(1), 54-67.
- Corlett, RT. 2015. The Anthropocene concept in ecology and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 30(1):36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.007. Epub 2014 Nov 24. PMID: 25468360.
- Cortes-Capano, G.; Hausmann, A.; Di Minin, E.; and Kortetm ä ki, T. 2022. Ethics in biodiversity conservation: The meaning and importance of pluralism. Biological Conservation, 275, 109759.
- Chapman, JM. and Schott, S. 2020. Knowledge coevolution: Generating new understanding through bridging and strengthening distinct knowledge systems and empowering local knowledge holders. Sustainability Science, 15(3), 931-943.
- Chattopadhyay, S.; and De Vries, R. 2013. Respect for cultural diversity in bioethics is an ethical imperative. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 16(4), 639-645.
- Chenhall, R.; Martinelli, L.; McLaughlin, J.; Paulsen, B.; Senior, K.; Svalastog, AL.; Tunon, H. and Werdelin, L. 2014. Culture, science and bioethics: Interdisciplinary understandings of and practices in science, culture and ethics. New Zealand Online Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 1 (2), 100-124.
- Chukwuneke, FN.; Umeora, OUJ.; Maduabuchi, JU. and Egbunike, N. 2014. Global bioethics and culture in a pluralistic world: How does culture influence bioethics in Africa?. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research, 4(5), 672-675.
- Crutzen, PJ.; and Stoermer, EF. 2022. The ‘anthropocene (2000). In Paul J. Crutzen and the anthropocene: A new epoch in earth ’ s history (pp. 19-21). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
- Dawson, A. 2010. The future of bioethics: three dogmas and a cup of hemlock. Bioethics, 24(5), 218-225.
- Dietershagen, J. and Bammann, H. 2023. Opportunities for youth in the bioeconomy – Opportunities and barriers for youth employment and entrepreneurship in the emerging bioeconomy sectors. FAO Agricultural Development Economics Technical Study, No. 30. Rome, FAO. https://doi.org/10.4060/cc8238en
- Donadoni, P., and Ciliberti, R. 2024. How the Anthropocene is changing bioethics. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, 65(2), E303. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2024.65.2.3224. PMID: 39430997; PMCID: PMC11487724.
- Ebbesen, M., and Pedersen, BD. 2007. Empirical investigation of the ethical reasoning of physicians and molecular biologists–the importance of the four principles of biomedical ethics. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 2, 1-16. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/1747-5341-2-23.pdf
- Engelhardt Jr, HT. 1996. The foundations of bioethics. Oxford University Press.
- Fajardo, AMF. 2021. Ética de Immanuel Kant. Revista Internacional de Filosof í a Te ó rica y Pr á ctica, 1(1), 127-138. file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/23-Texto%20del%20art%C3%ADculo-33-1-10-20210130.pdf
- FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2021. Aspirational Principles and Criteria for a Sustainable Bioeconomy. Bioeconomy. Rome. https://www.fao.org/3/cb3706en/cb3706en.pdf
- Fox-Kemper, B. 2021. Ocean, cryosphere and sea level change. In AGU fall meeting abstracts. Vol. 2021, pp. U13B-09.
- GBS (Global Bioeconomy Summit). 2018. Global Bioeconomy Summit Conference Report Innovation in the Global Bioeconomy for Sustainable and Inclusive Transformation and Wellbeing. Berlin, Office of the Bioeconomy Council. https://gbs2020.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/GBS_2018_Report_web.pdf.
- Giampietro, M. 2023. Reflections on the popularity of the circular bioeconomy concept: The ontological crisis of sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 18(2), 749-754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-022-01267-z
- Goodwin, M., Kramer, C., and Cashmore, A. 2012. The ‘ethics committee’: a practical approach to introducing bioethics and ethical thinking. Journal of Biological Education, 46(3), 188-192. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2012.688846
- Gracia Guill é n, D. 2002. From clinical bioethics to global bioethics: thirty years of evolution. Acta Bioethica, 8(1). https://actabioethica.uchile.cl/index.php/AB/article/view/16857
- Gray, B. 2019. (Bio)Ethics in a Pluralistic Society. Challenges, 10(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe10010012
- Gregg, B. 2022. Political bioethics. In The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine (Vol. 47, No. 4, pp. 516-529). US: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhac008
- Gros Espiell, H. 2005. Etica, bioética y derecho. Bogotá: Temis.
- Haggarty, L. 1996. What is content analysis? Medical Teacher 18(2): 99–101.
- Hellsten SK. 2018. Global bioethics: utopia or reality? Developing World Bioethics. 8(2):70-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00162.x. PMID: 19143084.
- Hodson de Jaramillo, E. 2018. Bioeconomía: el futuro sostenible. Revista de la Academia Colombiana de Ciencias Exactas, F í sicas y Naturales, 42(164), 188-201. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S0370-39082018000300188&script=sci_arttext
- Holm, S. 2018. Bioethics: An introduction. Oxford University Press.
- Innerarity, D. 2022. La sociedad del desconocimiento. Barcelona: Galaxia Gutenberg. https://www.galaxiagutenberg.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/La-sociedad-deldesconocimiento_web.pdf
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), 2023: Sections. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, pp. 35-115, doi: 10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
- Ijatuyi, EJ.; Lamm, A.; Yessoufou, K.; Suinyuy, T.; and Patrick, HO. 2025. Integration of indigenous knowledge with scientific knowledge: A systematic review. Environmental Science & Policy, 170, 104119.
- Jasanoff, S. 2004. The idiom of co-production. In States of knowledge (pp. 1-12). Routledge.
- Jessen, TD.; Ban, NC.; Claxton, NX. and Darimont, CT. 2022. Contributions of Indigenous Knowledge to ecological and evolutionary understanding. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 20(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2435
- K ö hler, J.; Reis, AA. and Saxena, A. 2020. A survey of national ethics and bioethics committees. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 99(2), 138. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7856354/pdf/BLT.19.243907.pdf
- Laland, KN; Odling-Smee, J. and Feldman, MW. 2001. Cultural niche construction and human evolution. Journal of evolutionary biology, 14(1), 22-33.
- Lucivero, F., and Jongsma, KR. 2018. A mobile revolution for healthcare? Setting the agenda for bioethics. Journal of Medical Ethics, 44(10), 685-689. https://jme.bmj.com/content/medethics/44/10/685.full.pdf
- Luna, MYM., and V á squez, MAD. 2022. La urgencia de la bioética personalista en el cuidado ambiental. Apuntes de Bioética, 5(1), 98-110.
- Macpherson, C. 2022. Global bioethics: it’s past and future. Global Bioethics, 33(1), 45-49. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/11287462.2021.2011009
- Marino, P. 2017. Value pluralism, moral diversity, moral reasoning, and the foundations of bioethics. Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 3(4), 477-485.
- Mbugua, K. 2012. Respect for cultural diversity and the empirical turn in bioethics: a plea for caution. Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine, 5, 1.
- Mendieta Izquierdo, G.; Yate Ar é valo, A. and Torres L ó pez, TM. 2021. Representaciones sociales de bioética y ética en estudiantes de medicina. Educaci ó n M é dica Superior, 35(4). http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S0864-21412021000400004&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en
- Meyer, R. 2017. Bioeconomy strategies: Contexts, visions, guiding implementation principles and resulting debates. Sustainability, 9(6), 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061031
- Nagai, H.; Nakazawa, E. and Akabayashi, A. 2022. The creation of the Belmont Report and its effect on ethical principles: a historical study. Monash Bioeth. Rev. 40, 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40592-022-00165-5
- Osorio-Garc í a, SN. and Roberto-Alba, NF. 2023. Bioética global: entre normatividad biológica y normalización social. Trilog í a Ciencia Tecnolog í a Sociedad, 15(29), e2450. https://doi.org/10.22430/21457778.2450
- Pavi ć, I. 2025. Bioethics and Social Ethics in The Modern World: The Environmental and Social Sustainability Context (s). Springer Nature.
- Pose, C. 2020. La bioética, 50 años más tarde. EIDON. Revista espa ñ ola de bio é tica, (54), 11-23. DOI: 10.13184/eidon.54.2020.11-23.
- Potter, VR. 1971. Bioethics: bridge to the future.
- Potter, VR. 2012. Global bioethics: building on the Leopold legacy. MSU Press
- Pratt, B. 2024. Defending and Defining Environmental Responsibilities for the Health Research Sector. Science and Engineering Ethics, 30, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00487-z
- Ramsar 2021. Informe Anual Ramsar 2021 y Plan para el 2022: Iniciativa para los humedales del Mediterráneo.
- Reyes, VRO. and Arenas, MA. 2022. Sexto informe de evaluación del IPCC: cambio climático 2022 (impactos, adaptación y vulnerabilidad). https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg2/
- Rip, A. and Kemp, R. 1998. Technological change. In Human choice and climate change: Vol. II, resources and technology (pp. 327-399). Battelle Press.
- Rockstr ö m, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; Persson, Å .; Chapin, FS.; Lambin, EF.; Lenton, TM.; Scheffer, M.; Folke, C.; Schellnhuber, HJ.; Nykvist, B., de Wit, C.; Hughes, T.; van der Leeuw, S.; Rodhe, H.; Sorlin, S.; Snyder, P.; Costanza, R.; Svedin, U.; Falkenmark; Karlberg, L.; Corell, R.W.; Fabry, V.; Hansen, J.; Walker, B.; Liverman, D.; Richardson, K.; Crutzen, P. and Foley, JA. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. nature, 461(7263), 472-475.
- Rothhaar, M. 2010. Human dignity and human rights in bioethics: the Kantian approach. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 13(3), 251-257. DOI:10.1007/s11019-010-9249-0
- Rozzi, R.; Chapin III, FS.; Callicott, JB.; Pickett, STA.; Power, ME.; Armesto, JJ. and May Jr, RH. 2015. Earth stewardship. Linking Ecology and Ethics in Theory and Practice. Cham: Springer.
- Saas, H. M. 2011. El pensamiento bioético de Fritz Jahr. Revista Aesth é thika Volumen 6, Número 2, 20-33. https://www.aesthethika.org/El-pensamiento-bioetico-de-Fritz
- S á nchez, AMP.; Morales, Á R. and Linares, EEH. 2024. Consideraciones en torno a la bioética ambiental. GADE: Revista Cient ífi ca, 4(2), 296-307.
- Sachs, JD. 2015. The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.
- Sandu, A. 2020. Bioethics–Philosophy or Science?. Logos, Universality, Mentality, Education, Novelty. Section: Philosophy and Humanistic Sciences, 8(1), 44-60. doi: 10.18662/lumenphs/8.1/35.
- Sarian, A. 2019. Ethical Self-Reflection in Papers, please. Cultural Science Journal, 11(1), pp. 41–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/csci.122
- Sharif, T. and Bugo, J. 2015. The anthropological approach challenges the conventional approach to bioethical dilemmas: a Kenyan Maasai perspective. African Health Sciences, 15(2), 628-633. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v15i2.41
- Sievers, M.; Pearson, RM. Turschwell, MP.; Bishop, MJ.; Bland, L.; Brown, CJ.; Tulloch, VJD.; Haig, JA.; Olds, JA.; Maxwell, PS. and Connolly, RM. 2020. Integrating outcomes of IUCN red list of ecosystems assessments for connected coastal wetlands. Ecological Indicators, 116, 106489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106489
- Sol-S á nchez, A.; Hern á ndez-Melchor, GI.; Hern á ndez-Hern á ndez, M. and Toru ñ o, PJ. 2022. Desarrollo bioeconómico y manglares en América Latina. Revista Iberoamericana de Bioeconom í a y Cambio Clim á tico, 8(16), 2007-2017. https://portal.amelica.org/ameli/journal/394/3943529009/3943529009.pdf
- Ten Have, H. 2010. Hacia un juramento ético universal para científicos1. Ciencia para la paz y el desarrollo: el caso del Juramento Hipocrático para Científicos, 17.
- Ten Have, H. and Gordijn, B. (Eds.). 2014. Handbook of global bioethics (Vol. 4). Springer Netherlands.
- Ten Have, H. 2016. Global bioethics: An introduction. Routledge.
- Ten Have H. 2022. The challenges of global bioethics. Glob Bioeth. 33(1):41-44. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2021.2011008. PMID: 35185327; PMCID: PMC8856073.
- Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. 2018. Nudge: Naar betere beslissingen over gezondheid, geluk en welvaart. Business Contact.
- Torralba, F. 2016. Grandes desafíos de la bioética. Escenarios de futuro. Revista Iberoamericana de Bio é tica, (1), 1-12. DOI: 10.14422/rib.i01.y2016.002
- Tronto, JC. 2013. Caring democracy: Markets, equality, and justice. In Caring Democracy. New York University Press.
- Turner L. 2004. Bioethics in pluralistic societies. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 7(2):201-8. doi: 10.1023/b:mhep.0000034330.44606.9c. PMID: 15379195.
- Turner, TR. 2012. Ethical issues in human population biology. Current Anthropology, 53(S5), S222-S232. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdf/10.1086/662661
- UNESCO (United Nations Educational Scienti fi c and Cultural Organization), Asamblea General. (2005). Declaración universal sobre bioética y derechos humanos.
- Varkey, B. 2021. Principles of clinical ethics and their application to practice. Medical Principles and Practice, 30(1), 17-28. https://karger.com/mpp/article-pdf/30/1/17/3128579/000509119.pdf
- Vidal, S. 2010. La bioética en América Latina: el programa de bioética de la UNESCO para la Región. Ciencia para la paz y el desarrollo: el caso del Juramento Hipocr á tico para Cient ífi cos, 2, 137-153.
- Virgolino, JLF. and Holden, NM. 2025. Does the bioeconomy literature provide a balanced view of sustainability?. Sustainability Science, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01642-6
- Wabnitz, K.; Pratt B.; Timmermann, C.and Wild, V. 2025. Bioethics for a burning planet: why Planetary Health and One Health might not be the way to go. Glob Bioethics. 36(1):2593723. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2025.2593723. PMID: 41378255; PMCID: PMC12687894.
- Wilches Fl ó rez, Á M. 2014. La bioética, la voz orientadora de la investigación. Revista Lasallista de Investigaci ó n, 11(1), 97-102. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?pid=S1794-44492014000100012&script=sci_arttext
- Zemel, MGE.; Miguel, R.; Vanoni, VV.; Bosi Garc í a, SF. and Di Bastiano, SN. 2020. Análisis de dilemas bioéticos asociados con la biología. En Primer Congreso de Educaci ó n en Ciencias Biol ó gicas (CECIB) (Edición virtual, 27 y 28 de noviembre de 2020).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/csj-2023-0011 | Journal eISSN: 1836-0416
Language: English
Page range: 123 - 145
Published on: Feb 25, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Erika Salavarría, Ronald Cárdenas, Fernando Arroyo, Segundo Vilema, published by Max Weber Centre for Advanced Cultural and Social Studies, Erfurt University, Germany
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.