Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Integrated Crop Pest Management Practices: A Classification Based on a Rapid Review of International and Canadian Literature Cover

Integrated Crop Pest Management Practices: A Classification Based on a Rapid Review of International and Canadian Literature

Open Access
|Nov 2025

Abstract

Crops are vulnerable to weeds, fungi, insects, nematodes, rodents and diseases. To address these threats rapidly, farmers tend to adopt a curative approach based on the use of synthetic pesticides (fungicides, herbicides, insecticides) rather than a preventive approach without pesticides. This reliance on pesticides poses risks to human health, the environment, and wildlife, including pollinators such as bees and bats. Reducing pesticide use has thus become an important societal and political objective worldwide. In Canada, the Government of Quebec’s Sustainable Agriculture Plan (PAD) 2020–2030 promotes, as its first objective, the adoption of alternative practices aimed at reducing pesticide sales by 500,000 kilograms by 2030 and decreasing health and environmental risks by 40%. This article takes stock of alternative practices of synthetic pesticides use in the literature in Canada and internationally from the perspective of Integrated Crop Pest Management (ICPM) stages and the Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food of Quebec (MAFFQ) typology1, to see which ones could possibly be used in Quebec. To do this, we used the “Rapid Review” method of the literature based on the exploitation of 71 scientific references. The findings indicate that countries with agroeconomic conditions comparable to those of Canada are adopting alternative and good agricultural practices, as well as physical, mechanical, biological, and biotechnical control methods; however, pesticide use often persists alongside these approaches. While practices belonging to the prevention and intervention stages through physical, mechanical, biological, and chemical control appear to be highly adopted by producers, practices belonging to the pest knowledge, monitoring, evaluation, and feedback stages appear to be poorly adopted by producers. The authors recommend improving access to information on crop pests and ICPM practices, along with enhancing farmers’ awareness of the economic, health, and environmental risks associated with pesticide use. Future research should focus on classifying and analyzing ICPM practices by stage to support the development of public policy recommendations tailored to each stage, particularly regarding incentives and barriers to adoption, as well as their impacts on producers.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/contagri-2025-0025 | Journal eISSN: 2466-4774 | Journal ISSN: 0350-1205
Language: English
Page range: 217 - 236
Submitted on: May 15, 2025
|
Accepted on: Jul 1, 2025
|
Published on: Nov 27, 2025
Published by: University of Novi Sad
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Aminata Diagne, Marie-Ève Gaboury-Bonhomme, Jean-François Bissonnette, Gratias Gloria Denise M. Godonou, published by University of Novi Sad
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.