Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Pig-Typical Gene Pool Characteristics in Wild Boars from Vojvodina, Serbia: A Study of Genetic Diversity, Differentiation, Assignment, and Admixture Cover

Pig-Typical Gene Pool Characteristics in Wild Boars from Vojvodina, Serbia: A Study of Genetic Diversity, Differentiation, Assignment, and Admixture

Open Access
|Dec 2023

References

  1. Addo S. & Jung L. (2022): An insight into the runs of homozygosity distribution and breed differentiation in Mangalitsa pigs. Frontiers in Genetics, 13: 909986. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.909986
  2. Belkhir K., Castric V., Bonhomme F. (2002): IDENTIX, a software to test for relatedness in a population using permutation methods. Molecular Ecology Notes, 2: 611-614.
  3. Belkhir K. (2004): GENETIX V. 4.0, logiciel sous WindowsTM pour la génétique des populations. Laboratoire Génome, Populations, Interactions CNRS UMR 5000, Université de Montpellier II, Montpellier (France).
  4. Böheim D., Knauer F., Stefanović M., Zink R., Kübber-Heiss A., Posautz A., Beiglböck C., Dressler A., Strauss V., Dier H., Djan M., Velićković N., Zhelev C.D., Smith S., Suchentrunk F. (2023): Signals of Pig Ancestry in Wild Boar, Sus scrofa, from Eastern Austria: Current Hybridisation or Incomplete Gene Pool Differentiation and Historical Introgressions? Diversity 15, 790, https://doi.org/10.3390/d15060790
  5. Choi S.K., Lee J.-E., Kim Y.-J., Min M.-S., Voloshina I., Myslenkov A., Oh J.G., Kim T.-H., Markov N., Seryodkin I., Ishiguro N., Yu L., Zhang Y.-P., Lee H., Kim K.S. (2014): Genetic structure of wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations from East Asia based on microsatellite loci analyses. BMC Genetics, 15: 85. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2156/15/85
  6. Corander J., Marttinen P., Sirén J., Tang J. (2008): Enhanced Bayesian modelling in BAPS software for learning genetic structures. BMC Bioinformatics, 16:539.
  7. Cornuet J.M., Piry S., Luikart G., Estoup A., Solignac M. (1999): New methods employing multilocus genotypes to select or exclude populations as origins of individuals. Genetics, 153: 1989-2000.
  8. de Jong J.F., Iacolina L., Prins H.H.T., van Hooft P., Crooijmans R.P.M.A., van Wieren S.E., Baños J.V., Baubet E., Cahill S., Ferreira E., Fonseca C., Glazov P.M., Turinek I.J., Martín V.M.L., Náhlik A., Pokorny B., Podgórski T., Šprem N., Veeroja R., Ydenberg R.C., Megens H.-J. (2023): Spatial genetic structure of European wild boar, with inferences on late-Pleistocene and Holocene demographic history. Heredity, 130: 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-022-00587-1
  9. Earl D.A. & von Holdt B.M. (2012): STRUCTURE Harvester: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conservation Genetic Resources, 4: 35.
  10. Evanno G., Regnaut S., Goudet J. (2005): Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Molecular Ecology, 14: 2611-2620.
  11. Falush D., Stephens M., Pritchard J.K. (2003): Inference of populations structure: extensions to linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics, 164: 1567-1587.
  12. Frantz A.C., Zachos F.E., Kirschning J., Cellina S., Bertouilles S., Mamuris Z., Koutsogiannouli E.A., Burke T. (2013): Genetic evidence for introgression between domestic pigs and wild boars (Sus scrofa) in Belgium and Luxembourg: a comparative approach with multiple marker systems. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 110: 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12111
  13. Frantz L.A.F., Schraiber J.G., Madsen O., Megens H.-J., Cagan A., Bosse M., Paudel Y., Crooijmans R.P.M.A., Larson, G., Groenen, M.A.M. (2015): Evidence of long-term gene flow and selection during domestication from analyses of Eurasian wild and domestic pig genomes. Nature Genetics, 47: 1141-1148.
  14. Goudet J. (1995): FSTAT (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate Fstatistics. Journal of Heredity, 86: 485-486.
  15. Iacolina L., Pertoldi C., Amills M., Kusza S., Megens H.-J., Bâlteanu V.L., Bakan J., Cubric-Curik V., Oja R., Saarma U., Scandura M., Šprem N., Stronen A.V. (2018): Hotspots of recent hybridization between pigs and wild boars in Europe. Scientific Reports, 8: 7372.
  16. IBM SPSS Statistics vers. 29.0.1.0., IBM Corporation. https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/spss-statistics/29.0.0
  17. Nikolić D., Đinović-Stojanović J., Janković S., Stanińić N., Radović C., Pezo L., Lauńević M. (2017): Mineral Composition and Toxic Element Levels of Muscle, Liver and Kidney of Intensive (Swedish Landrace) and Extensive (Mangulica) Pigs from Serbia. Food Additives and Contaminants - Part a Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure and Risk Assessment, 34(6): 962-971. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2017.1310397
  18. Nikolov I.S., Stoeckle B.C., Markov G., Kuehn R., (2017): Substantial hybridisation between wild boars (Sus scrofa scrofa) and East Balkan Pigs (Sus scrofa f. domestica) in natural environment as a result of semi-wild rearing in Bulgaria. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 62: 1-8.
  19. Paetkau D., Slade R., Burden M., Estoup A. (2004): Direct real-time estimation of migration rate using assignment methods: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Molecular Ecology, 13: 55-65.
  20. Piry S., Alapetite A., Cornuet J.-M., Paetkau D., Baudouin L., Estoup L. (2004): GeneClass2: A software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. Journal of Heredity, 95: 536-539.
  21. Pritchard J.K., Stephens M., Donnelly P. (2000): Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155: 945-959.
  22. Rannala B. & Moutain J.L. (1997): Detecting immigration by using multilocus genotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 94: 9197-9201.
  23. Scandura M., Iacolina L., Apollonio M. (2011): Genetic diversity in the European wild boar Sus scrofa: Phylogeography, population structure and wild x domestic hybridization. Mammal Review, 41: 125-137.
  24. Veličković N., Djan M., Obreht D., Vapa Lj. (2012): Population genetic structure of wild boars in the West Balkan Region. Russian Journal of Genetics, 9: 849-863.
  25. Vetter S.G., Bieber C., Suchentrunk F. (2014): Evaluating commonly used microsatellites for parenthood analysis and population assignment in wild boar (Sus scrofa). Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Wild Boar and other Suids, Velenje, Slovenia, 6-9 September 2014, Book of abstracts, p. 118.
  26. Vetter S., Brandstätter C., Macheiner M., Suchentrunk F., Gerritsmann H, Bieber C. (2016): Shy is sometimes better: Personality and juvenile body mass affect adult reproductive success in wild boars, Sus scrofa. Behaviour, 115: 193-205.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/contagri-2023-0028 | Journal eISSN: 2466-4774 | Journal ISSN: 0350-1205
Language: English
Page range: 207 - 215
Submitted on: Oct 19, 2023
Accepted on: Nov 27, 2023
Published on: Dec 22, 2023
Published by: University of Novi Sad
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Denise Böheim, Nevena Veličković, Mihajla Djan, Milomir Stefanović, Dragan Žikić, Franz Suchentrunk, published by University of Novi Sad
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.