Effects of Antibiotic Diluent Additives on the Motility Parameters and Morphological Integrity of Boar Sperm During Six Days of Storage
References
- Althouse C.G. & Lu K.G. (2005): Bacteriospermia in extended porcine semen.
Theriogenology , 63(2): 573-584. - Althouse G.C. (2008): Sanitary procedures for the production of extended semen.
Reproduction in Domestic Animals , 43: 374–378. - Althouse G.C., Kuster C.E., Clark S.G., Weisiger R.M. (2000): Field investigations of bacterial contaminants and their effects on extended porcine semen.
Theriogenology , 53: 1167–76. - Blom E. (1950): A one-minute live-dead sperm stain by means of eosin-nigrosin.
Fertility and Sterility , 1: 176-177. - Bonet S., Briz M., Pinart E., Camps R., Fradera A. et al. (1995): Light microscopy characterization of sperm morphology.
Microscopy and Analysis , 9: 29-31. - Bresciani C., Morini G., Bettini R., Bigliardi E., Di Ianni F., Cabassi C.S., Sabbioni A., Parmigiani E. (2013): Reproductive efficiency of a new modified boar semen extender for liquid storage.
Livestock Science , 157: 384–388. - Briz M. (1994): Microscopical analysis of the ejaculated sperm and the sperm epididymal maturation of Sus domesticus. PhD Thesis, Universitat de Girona.
- Briz M.D., Bonet S., Pinart B., Egozcue J., Camps R. (1995): Comparative study of boar sperm coming from the caput, corpus, and cauda regions of the epididymis.
Journal of Andrology , 16(2): 175-188. - Bryła M. & Trzcińska, M. (2015): Quality and fertilizing capacity of boar spermatozoa during liquid storage in extender supplemented with different antibiotics.
Animal Reproduction Science , 163: 157–163. - Buxade C.C. (1984): Ganado Porcino: Sistemas de explotacion y tecnicas de produccion. Mundi-Prensa. Madrid, Spain.
- Cerolini S., Maldjian A., Surai P., Noble R. (2000): Viability, susceptibility to peroxidation and fatty acid composition of boar semen during liquid storage.
Animal Reproduction Science , 58(1-2): 99-111. - Dahmani Y., Ausejo R., Mendoza N., Yeregui J. (2015): Antibacterial efficiency of Dicol and reduction of antibiotics use in boar semen doses.
Reproduction of Domestic Animals , 50 (Supplement 2): 126. - Dias C.P., Castagna, C.D., Reis G.R., Simonetti R., Bortolozzo, F.P., Wentz I., Cardoso M. (2000): Grau de contaminação bacteriana no ejaculado de suínos submetidos a dois métodos de higienização e coleta. Arquivos da faculdade de veterinária UFRGS, 28: 32–40.
- Freking B.A., Purdy P.H., Spiller S.F., Welsh C.S., Blackburn H.D. (2012): Boar sperm quality in lines of pigs selected for either ovulation rate or uterine capacity.
Journal of Animal Sciences , 90(8): 2515-2523. - Gadea J. (2003): Review: Semen extenders used in the artificial insemination of swine.
Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research , 1(2): 17-27. - Gadea J., Selles E., Marco M.A. (2004): The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions.
Reproduction in Domestic Animals , 39(5): 303-308. - Gogol P., Szczesniak-Fabianczyk B., Wierzchos-Hilczer A. (2009): The photon emission, ATP level and motility of boar spermatozoa during liquid storage.
Reproductive Biology , 9(1): 39-49. - Goldberg A.M.G., Argenti L.E., Faccin J.E., Linck L., Santi M., Bernardi M.L., Cardoso M.R.I., Wentz I., Bortolozzo F.P. (2013): Risk factors for bacterial contamination during boar semen collection,
Research in Veterinary Science , 95: 362–367. - Holt W., Watson P., Curry M., Holt C. (1994): Reproducibility of Computer-aided Semen Analysis: Comparison of Five Different Systems Used in a Practical Workshop.
Fertiliy and Sterility , 62(6): 1277-1282. - Huerta I., Dahmani Y., Ausejo R., Ubeda J.L. (2011): A new tool for control of bacterial contamination in boar semen. Spain. Allen D. Leman Swine Conference, pp. 288.
- Huo L.J., Ma X.H., Yang Z.M. (2002): Assesment of sperm viability, mitochondrial activity, capacitation and acrosome intactness in extended boar semen during long-term storage.
Theriogenology , 58(7): 1349-1360. - Jeyendran R.S., Van der Ven H.H., Perez-Pelaez M., Crabo B.G., Zaneveld L.J. (1984): Development of an assay to assess the functional integrity of the human sperm membrane and its relationship to other semen characteristics.
Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 70(1): 219-228. - Johnson L.A., Weitze K.F., Fiser P., Maxwell W.M.C. (2000): Storage of boar semen.
Animal Reproduction Science , 62(1-3): 143-172. - Jotanović S. & Savić Đ. (2017): The Boar. 1st ed. Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina: University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Agriculture.
- Knox R.V. (2016): Artificial insemination in pigs today.
Theriogenology, 85: 83-93. - Kommisrud E., Paulenz H., Sehested E., Grevle I.S. (2002): Influence of boar and semen parameters on motility and acrosome integrity in liquid boar semen stored for five days.
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 43(1): 49-55. - Mapeka M.H., Lehloenya K.C., Nedambale T.L. (2012): Comparison of different extenders and storage temperature on the sperm motility characteristics of Kolbroek pig semen.
South African Journal of Animal Science, 42(5): 530-534. - Maroto Martín L.O., Muñoz E.C., De Cupere F., Van Driessche E., Echemendia-Blanco D., Rodríguez J.M., Beeckmans S. (2010): Bacterial contamination of boar semen affects the litter size.
Animal Reproduction Science , 120(1-4): 95-104. - Martín L.O.M., Muñoz E.C., Cupere F., Driessche E.V., Echemendia-Blanco D., Rodríguez J.M.M., Beeckmans S., (2010): Bacterial contamination of boar semen affects the litter size.
Animal Reproduction Science , 120: 95-104. - Paquignon M., Bussière J., Bariteau F. (1988): Efficacité des techniques de conservation de la semence de verrat. INRA
Production Animales , 1(4): 271-280. - Pezo F., Romero F., Zambrano F., Sánchez R. S. (2019): Preservation of boar semen: An update.
Reproduction in domestic animals, 54(3): 423-434. - Rath D., Bathgate R., Rodriguez-Martinez H., Roca J., Strzezek J., Waberski D. (2009): Recent advances in boar sperm cryopreservation. Society of Reproduction and Fertility, Supplement, 66: 51-66.
- Sancho Badell S. (2002): Efectes del fotoperiode sobre la qualitat espermatica de mascles porcins Sus domesticus. PhD Thesis. Universitat de Girona.
- Santos P.M., Bennemann P.E., Rocha J.C., Reis G.M., Calderam K. (2018): Uso do Dicol® como ferramenta de reducao da contaminacao bacteriana do ejaculado suino: efeito sobre a motilidade espermatica de doses inseminates. PORKEXPO 2018 IX Forum Internacional de Suinocultura. Foz do Iguacu/PR, pp. 305-306.
- Schulze M., Ammon C., Rüdiger K., Jung M., Grobbel M. (2015): Analysis of hygienic critical control points in boar semen production.
Theriogenology , 83: 430–437. - Sone M. (1990): Investigations on the control of bacteria in boar semen.
Japan Journal of Animal Reproduction , 36: 23-29. - Suwimonteeraburt J., Thuwanut P., Singlor J., Chatdarong K., Tummaruk P. (2011): Effect of collection extender (Dicol) on cold stored boar sperm viability and bacterial contamination. T
hai Journal of Veterinary Medicine , 41: 173-174. - Ubeda J.L., Ausejo R., Dahmani Y., Falceto M.V., Usan A., Malo C, et al. (2013): Adverse effects of members of the Enterobacteriaceae family on boar sperm quality.
Theriogenology , 80:565–70. - Vyt P., Maes D., Quinten C., Rijsselaere T., Deley W. Aarts M., de Kruif A., Van Soom A. (2008): Detailed motility evaluation of boar semen and its predictive value for reproductive performance in sows.
Vlaams Diergeneeskundig Tijdschrift , 77: 291-298. - Waberski D., Weyand A., Seedorf J., Weitze, K.F. (2010): Hygiene measures in boar semen production.
Acta Scientiae Veterinariae , 38 (Suppl. 1): 1–7. - Waberski D., Riesenbeck A., Schulze M., Weitze K. F., Johnson L. (2019): Application of preserved boar semen for artificial insemination: past, present and future challenges.
Theriogenology , 137: 2-7. - Yeste M. (2017): State-of-the-art of boar sperm preservation in liquid and frozen state.
Animal Reproduction , 14(1): 69–81.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/contagri-2019-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2466-4774 | Journal ISSN: 0350-1205
Language: English
Page range: 65 - 70
Submitted on: Jul 10, 2019
Accepted on: Sep 25, 2019
Published on: Dec 11, 2019
Published by: University of Novi Sad
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2019 Stoja Jotanović, Borislav Peno, Siniša Mandić, Đorđe Savić, Marinko Vekić, Marija Jovičić, published by University of Novi Sad
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.