Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Role of Digital Forensics in Protecting Critical Energy Infrastructure from Cyberattacks Cover

The Role of Digital Forensics in Protecting Critical Energy Infrastructure from Cyberattacks

By:   
Open Access
|Sep 2026

References

  1. Abraham, D., Houmb, S.H., Erdodi, L., 2025. Cyberattacks on energy infrastructure – A literature overview and perspectives on the current situation. Applied Sciences 15, 9233. DOI: 10.3390/app15179233.
  2. Ahmed, I., Obermeier, S., Naedele, M., Richard, G.G., 2012. SCADA systems: Challenges for forensic investigators. Computer (Long Beach Calif) 45, 44–51. DOI: 10.1109/MC.2012.325.
  3. Akkad, A., Wills, G., Rezazadeh, A., 2023. An information security model for an IoT-enabled smart grid in the Saudi energy sector. Computers and Electrical Engineering 105, 108491. DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108491.
  4. Alelyani, S., Kumar, G.R.H., 2018. Overview of cyberattack on Saudi organizations. Journal of Information Security and Cybercrimes Research. DOI: 10.26735/16587790.2018.004.
  5. Alharbi, F., 2025. Twelve years of cyber resilience: Analyzing cyberattacks in Saudi Arabia (2012–2024). TEM Journal 14, 1791–1807. DOI: 10.18421/TEM142-77.
  6. Alkhalifa, M., Aljaafari, M., Muzafar, S., 2024. Top 5 deadly cybersecurity threats to Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Preprints. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202408.2244.v1.
  7. Al-Mulhim, R.A., Al-Zamil, A., Al-Dossary, F.M., 2020. Cyber-attacks on Saudi Arabia environment. International Journal of Computer Networks and Communications Security 8, 1–7. DOI: 10.47277/IJCNCS/8(3)1.
  8. Alsaeed, A., 2021. The cyberattack on Saudi Aramco in 2012. Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology 10, 25–28. DOI: 10.51983/ajeat-2021.10.2.3057.
  9. Arshad, H., Jantan, A. B., Abiodun, O.I., 2018. Digital forensics: Review of issues in scientific validation of digital evidence. Journal of Information Processing Systems 14, 346–376. DOI: 10.3745/JIPS.03.0095.
  10. Apostolou, B., Apostolou, N., Schaupp, C. L., 2018. Assessing and responding to cyber risk: The energy industry as example. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting 10, 73–94.
  11. Bakić, B., Milić, M., Antović, I., Savić, D., Stojanović, T., 2021. 10 years since Stuxnet: What have we learned from this mysterious computer software worm? Proceedings of IT 2021. IEEE. DOI: 10.1109/IT51528.2021.9390103.
  12. Bellamkonda, S., Bellamkonda, S., 2024. Ransomware attacks on critical infrastructure: A study of the Colonial Pipeline incident. International Journal of Research in Computer Applications and Information Technology 7, 1423–1433. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14191113.
  13. Bozhyk, V., Popovych, M., Khakhutsiak, O., Denysenko, M., Herasymenko, O., Law, I., 2025. Evaluating computer forensics for cybercrime investigations in critical infrastructure sectors. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 103.
  14. Carcano, A., Coletta, A., Guglielmi, M., Masera, M., Nai Fovino, I., Trombetta, A., 2011. A multidimensional critical state analysis for detecting intrusions in SCADA systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 7, 179–186. DOI: 10.1109/TII.2010.2099234.
  15. Cassotta, S., Sidortsov, R., 2019. Sustainable cybersecurity? Rethinking approaches to protecting energy infrastructure. Energy Research & Social Science. DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2019.01.003.
  16. Çetinkaya, Ş., Terzi, S., 2024. Analysing the effects of cyber security on national security from a realist perspective: Stuxnet example. Journal of Security Studies 26, 38–51.
  17. Cusack, B., Mahmoud, A., 2018. Digital forensics investigative framework for control rooms in critical infrastructure. Australian Digital Forensics Conference, 17–23. DOI: 10.25958/5c52674f66685.
  18. Dimitriadis, A., Ivezic, N., Kulvatunyou, B., Mavridis, I., 2020. Digital forensics framework for investigating cyber attacks. Array 5, 100015. DOI: 10.1016/j.array.2019.100015.
  19. Dudley, R., Golden, D., 2021. The Colonial Pipeline ransomware hackers had a secret weapon. ProPublica.
  20. Energy Sector Control Systems Working Group, 2014. Cybersecurity procurement language for energy delivery systems. U.S. Department of Energy.
  21. Fabro, M., Cornelius, E., 2008. Recommended practice: Creating cyber forensics plans for control systems. Idaho National Laboratory. DOI: 10.2172/944209.
  22. Gawazah, L., 2024. To pay or not to pay: The U.S. Colonial Pipeline ransomware attack. Arizona State University.
  23. Hoehn, J.R., 2020. Intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance design for great power competition. Congressional Research Service.
  24. Kilpatrick, T., González, J., Chandia, R., Papa, M., Shenoi, S., 2008. Forensic analysis of SCADA systems and networks. International Journal of Security and Networks 3, 95–102. DOI: 10.1504/IJSN.2008.017222.
  25. Kilpatrick, T., González, J., Chandia, R., Papa, M., Shenoi, S., 2006. An architecture for SCADA network forensics. Advances in Digital Forensics II. Springer, 273–285. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-36891-7_22.
  26. Lewis, J.A., 2023. Cyberattack on civilian critical infrastructures in a Taiwan scenario. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
  27. Mittal, S., 2015. The issues in cyber-defence and cyber-forensics of the SCADA systems. Indian Police Journal 62, 29–41.
  28. Musakhanov, D., 2023. The international consequences of cyber warfare: A study of the Stuxnet case. Acta of Turin Polytechnic University in Tashkent.
  29. Slowik, J., 2018. Anatomy of an attack: Detecting and defeating CRASHOVERRIDE. Dragos.
  30. Taleghani, M., Jabreilzadeh Sola, M., 2025. Digital forensics in industrial safety. International Journal of Machine Tools and Maintenance Engineering 6, 22–27. DOI: 10.22271/27074544.2025.v6.i1a.51.
  31. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2016. Understanding the special case of digital forensics in energy delivery systems (EDS): Making live analysis work for energy delivery systems. U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, DC.
  32. Van der Knijff, R., 2014. Control systems forensics: Challenges and solutions for investigating industrial control systems. Digital Investigation 11, 160–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.diin.2014.06.007.
  33. Wakchaure, M., Sarwade, S., Siddavatam, I., 2016. Reconnaissance of industrial control systems by deep packet inspection. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICETECH). DOI: 10.1109/ICETECH.2016.7569418.
  34. Yang, Y., McLaughlin, K., Sezer, S., Wang, Y., 2014. Multiattribute SCADA intrusion detection system. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 29, 1092–1102. DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2014.2300099.
  35. Zubair, N., Ayub, A., Yoo, H., Ahmed, I., 2022. Remote forensic acquisition of PLC memory in industrial control systems. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 40. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsidi.2022.301336.
  36. Kaplan, F., 2016. Dark Territory: The Secret History of Cyber War. Simon and Schuster, New York.
  37. Roscini, M., 2014. Cyber Operations and the Use of Force in International Law. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  38. Even, S., Siman-Tov, D., 2012. Cyber warfare: Concepts and strategic trends. Institute for National Security Studies Memorandum 117.
  39. Falliere, N., Murchu, L.O., Chien, E., 2011. W32. Stuxnet dossier. Symantec Security Response.
  40. Broad, W.J., Markoff, J., Sanger, D.E., 2011. Israeli test on worm called crucial in Iran nuclear delay. New York Times.
  41. Singer, P., Friedman, A., 2014. Cybersecurity and Cyberwar: What Everyone Needs to Know. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  42. Belous, A.I., Solodukha, V.A., 2021. Fundamentals of Cybersecurity: Standards, Search, Methods and Media. Tekhnosfera, Moscow.
  43. Anderson, C., Sadjadpour, K., 2018. Iran's cyber threat. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  44. Volkova, E., 2020. Cyber attacks as a means of political influence. CyberLeninka.
  45. International Atomic Energy Agency, 2012. IAEA and Iran: Chronology of key events. IAEA, Vienna.
  46. Langner, R., 2011. Stuxnet: Dissecting a cyberweapon. IEEE Security and Privacy 9, 49–51.
  47. Farwell, J.P., Rohozinski, R., 2011. Stuxnet and the future of cyber war. Survival 53, 23–40.
  48. Garfinkel, S.L., 2010. Digital forensics research: The next 10 years. Digital Investigation 7, S64–S73.
  49. Eden, P., Blyth, A., Burnap, P., 2017. Cyber-physical systems security: A manufacturing perspective. Computers in Industry 93, 1–10.
  50. Hosseini, S., Rezaei, M., 2019. Risk assessment in Iranian industrial operations. Journal of Industrial Management Studies 12, 45–60.
  51. Ministry of Science, Research and Technology, 2021. National digital security strategy report. Tehran.
  52. National Iranian Electricity Company, 2020. Technical assessment of power plant infrastructure. Tehran.
  53. Safety Division, Tehran Power Plant, 2023. Safety audit report: Cybersecurity preparedness. Tehran.
  54. Internal Incident Report, Isfahan Power Plant, 2021. Turbine failure analysis. Isfahan.
  55. Isfahan Power Plant Maintenance Records, 2022. Annual safety and maintenance summary. Isfahan.
  56. World Bank, 2023. Energy infrastructure resilience report. Washington, DC.
  57. Fars News Agency, 2022. Power outages spark protests in southern Iran.
  58. Braun, V., Clarke, V., 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3, 77–101.
  59. Yin, R.K., 2018. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
  60. American Psychological Association, 2020. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 7th ed. APA, Washington, DC.
  61. Wu, D., Liu, J., Yang, S., 2018. Cyber-physical security in transportation systems. Transportation Research Part C 92, 214–230.
  62. Katzman, K., 2022. Iran sanctions. Congressional Research Service Report.
  63. Reason, J., 2016. Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents. Routledge, London.
  64. Energy Delivery Systems Cybersecurity Roadmap Working Group, 2011. Roadmap to achieve energy delivery systems cybersecurity. U.S. DOE.
  65. Dragos, Inc., 2017. CRASHOVERRIDE analysis report. Dragos Intelligence Report.
  66. Dragos, Inc., 2018. Lessons learned from CRASHOVERRIDE. Dragos Intelligence Report.
  67. ProPublica, 2021. Colonial Pipeline ransomware case analysis.
  68. Congressional Research Service, 2020. Intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance overview. Washington, DC.
  69. Arizona State University, 2024. To pay or not to pay: Colonial Pipeline ransomware case study.
  70. Idaho National Laboratory, 2008. Cyber forensics plans for control systems. INL Report.
  71. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2016. Live analysis toolkit evaluation for energy delivery systems. PNNL Report.
  72. U.S. Department of Energy, 2014. Cybersecurity procurement language for energy delivery systems. DOE Report.
  73. CSIS, 2023. Cyberattack scenarios on civilian infrastructure. Center for Strategic and International Studies.
  74. IEEE, 2021. Proceedings of IT 2021 conference. IEEE Press.
  75. Springer, 2006. Advances in Digital Forensics II. Springer, Boston.
  76. Symantec Security Response, 2011. Stuxnet technical analysis whitepaper.
  77. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2018. Iran cyber capabilities report.
  78. Tekhnosfera Publishing, 2021. Cybersecurity standards and practices. Moscow.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cmc-2026-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2463-9575 | Journal ISSN: 2232-2825
Language: English, Slovenian
Page range: 53 - 71
Published on: Sep 30, 2026
Published by: General Staff of the Slovenian Armed Forces
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Inda Kreso, published by General Staff of the Slovenian Armed Forces
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.