Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Quantum-Cognitive Tunnelling Neural Networks for Military-Civilian Vehicle Classification and Sentiment Analysis Cover

Quantum-Cognitive Tunnelling Neural Networks for Military-Civilian Vehicle Classification and Sentiment Analysis

Open Access
|Jul 2026

References

  1. Abbas, A. H., Abdel-Ghani, H., Maksymov, I. S., 2024. Classical and quantum physical reservoir computing for onboard artificial intelligence systems: A perspective. Dynamics, 4: pp 643–670. DOI: 10.3390/dynamics4030033.
  2. Aerts, D., Arguëlles, J. A., 2022. Human perception as a phenomenon of quantization. Entropy, 24(9): 1207. DOI: 10.3390/e2491207.
  3. Aerts, D., Beltran, L., 2022. A Planck radiation and quantization scheme for human cognition and language. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.850725.
  4. Atmanspacher, H., Filk, T., 2010. A proposed test of temporal nonlocality in bistable perception. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, pp 314–321. DOI: 10.1016/j. jmp.2009.12.001.
  5. Ažaltovič, V., Škvareková, I., Pecho, P., Kandera, B., 2020. The correctness and reaction time of piloting the unmanned aerial vehicle. Transportation Research Procedia, 51, pp 342–348. DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2020.11.037.
  6. Busemeyer, J. R., Bruza, P. D., 2012. Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision. New York: Oxford University Press.
  7. Busemeyer, J. R., Fakhari, P., Kvam, P., 2017. Neural implementation of operations used in quantum cognition. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 130, pp 53–60.
  8. Choi, W., Lee, H., Paik, S. B., 2020. Slow rhythmic eye motion predicts periodic alternation of bistable perception. bioRxiv. DOI: 10.1101/2020.09.18.303198.
  9. Der Spiegel. 2025. Ukraine-Krieg: Deutsche Waffensysteme offenbar nur bedingt kriegstüchtig. Der Spiegel. [In German]. https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/ukraine-krieg-deutsche-waffensysteme-offenbar-nur-bedingt-kriegstuechtig-a-6aaeafa2-6802-418d-b7ce-feb1c9193b67?sara_ref=re-xx-cp-sh (Accessed 11 April 2025).
  10. Galam, S., 2024. Fake News: “No Ban, No Spread—With Sequestration”. Physics, 6, pp 859–876. DOI: 10.3390/physics6020053.
  11. Georgiev, D. D., 2019. Quantum Information and Consciousness. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  12. Georgiev, D. D., Glazebrook, J. F., 2018. The quantum physics of synaptic communication via the SNARE protein complex. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 135, pp 16–29.
  13. Ghose, P., Pinotsis, D. A., 2025. The FitzHugh-Nagumo equations and quantum noise. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal, 30, pp 12–20. DOI: 10.1016/j. csbj.2025.02.023.
  14. Griffiths, D. J., 2004. Introduction to Quantum Mechanics. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  15. Groh, M., Epstein, Z., Firestone, C., Picard, R., 2022. Deepfake detection by human crowds, machines, and machine-informed crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 119, e2110013119. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2110013119.
  16. Gupta, P., Pareek, B., Singal, G., Rao, D. V., 2021. Military and Civilian Vehicles Classification. Mendeley Data, V1. DOI: 10.17632/njdjkbxdpn.1.
  17. Han, J., Li, W., Li, Y., Cai, Z., 2024. Quantum cognition-inspired EEG-based recommendation via graph neural networks. Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM ’24): pp 778–788. DOI: 10.1145/3627673.3679564.
  18. Heiming, G., 2020. Features of Modern Military Logistic Trucks. European Security, Defence. https://euro-sd.com/2020/09/articles/technology/18839/features-of-modern-military-logistic-trucks/(Accessed 14 April 2025).
  19. Jiang, J., Lai, Y. C., 2019. Model-free prediction of spatiotemporal dynamical systems with recurrent neural networks: Role of network spectral radius. Physical Review Research, 1, 033056. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.1.033056.
  20. Joos, E., Giersch, A., Hecker, L., Schipp, J., Heinrich, S. P., van Elst, L. T., Kornmeier, J., 2020. Large EEG amplitude effects are highly similar across Necker cube, smiley, and abstract stimuli. PLoS ONE, 15, e0232928. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232928.
  21. Jospin, L. V., Laga, H., Boussaid, F., Buntine, W., Bennamoun, M., 2022. Hands-on Bayesian neural networks – A tutorial for deep learning users. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 17, pp 29–48. DOI: 10.1109/MCI.2022.3155327.
  22. Khrennikov, A., 2006. Quantum-like brain: “Interference of minds”. Biosystems, 84, pp 225–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2005.11.005.
  23. Khrennikov, A., 2023. Coherent decision making stimulated within the social laser: open quantum systems framework. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 381, 20220294. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2022.0294.
  24. Köbis, N. C., Doležalová, B., Soraperra, I., 2021. Fooled twice: People cannot detect deepfakes but think they can. iScience, 24, 103364. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.103364.
  25. Krizhevsky, A., 2009. Learning Multiple Layers of Features from Tiny Images. Technical Report, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
  26. Kuniecki, M., Pilarczyk, J., Wichary, S., 2015. The color red attracts attention in an emotional context. An ERP study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00212.
  27. Maksimovic, M., Maksymov, I. S., 2025. Quantum-cognitive neural networks: Assessing confidence and uncertainty with human decision-making simulations. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 9, 12. DOI: 10.3390/bdcc9010012.
  28. Maksimovic, M., Maksymov, I. S., 2025. Transforming Neural Networks into Quantum-Cognitive Models: A Research Tutorial with Novel Applications. Technologies, 13, 183. DOI: 10.3390/technologies13050183.
  29. Maksymov, I. S., 2024. Quantum-inspired neural network model of optical illusions. Algorithms, 17(1), p 30. DOI: 10.3390/a17010030.
  30. Maksymov, I. S., 2024. Quantum-tunneling deep neural network for optical illusion recognition. APL Machine Learning, 2, 036107. DOI: 10.1063/5.0225771.
  31. Maksymov, I. S., Pogrebna, G., 2024. Quantum-mechanical modelling of asymmetric opinion polarisation in social networks. Information, 15, 170. DOI: 10.3390/info15030170.
  32. Maksymov, I. S., Pogrebna, G., 2024. The physics of preference: unravelling imprecision of human preferences through magnetisation dynamics. Information, 15, 413. DOI: 10.3390/info15070413.
  33. Maksymov, I. S., Pogrebna, G., 2025. Exploring Cognitive Paradoxes in Video Games: A Quantum Mechanical Perspective. [arXiv:q-bio.NC/2307.08758]. DOI: 10.48550/arXiv.2307.08758.
  34. Mannone, M., Chella, A., Pilato, G., Seidita, V., Vella, F., Gaglio, S., 2024. Modeling robotic thinking and creativity: A classic-quantum dialogue. Mathematics, 12, 642. DOI: 10.3390/math12050642.
  35. McNaughton, J., Abbas, A. H., Maksymov, I. S., 2025. Neuromorphic Quantum Neural Networks with Tunnel-Diode Activation Functions. https://arxiv.org/html/2503.04978v1 (Accessed 11 April 2025).
  36. Moy, G., Shek, S., Oxenham, M., Ellis-Steinborner, S., 2020. Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence and their Impact on Defence. Technical Report DST-Group-TR-3716. Defence Science and Technology Group, Australia. https://www.dst.defence.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/documents/DST-Group-TR-3716_0.pdf (Accessed 11 April 2025).
  37. Pothos, E. M., Busemeyer, J. R., 2022. Quantum Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 73(1):pp 749–778. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-psych-033020-123501.
  38. Quantum Brilliance, 2025. Quantum Brilliance’s Room-Temp Quantum Accelerator Goes Live at Fraunhofer IAF. The Quantum Insider. https://thequantuminsider.com/2025/06/05/quantum-brilliances-room-temp-quantum-accelerator-goes-live-at-fraunhofer-iaf (Accessed 11 April 2025).
  39. Responsible AI in the Military domain (REAIM) Summit, 2024. Blueprint for Action. Seoul, Republic of Korea, 9–10 September. https://reaim2024.kr/reaimeng/index.do (Accessed 11 April 2025).
  40. Rowe, N. C., 2022. The comparative ethics of artificial-intelligence methods for military applications. Frontiers in Big Data, 5, 991759. DOI: 10.3389/fdata.2022.991759.
  41. Sadek, M., Kallina, E., Bohné, T., Mougenot, C., Calvo, R. A., Cave, S., 2025. Challenges of responsible AI in practice: scoping review and recommended actions. AI, Society, 40, pp 199–215. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-024-01880-9.
  42. Schraagen, J. M. (ed.), 2024. Responsible Use of AI in Military Systems. Chapman and Hall/CRC Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Series. Chapman and Hall/CRC, pp 88, 97–98. DOI: 10.1201/9781003410379.
  43. Solomon, S. S., King, J. G., 1995. Influence of color on fire vehicle accidents. Journal of Safety Research, 26, pp 41–48. DOI: 10.1016/0022-4375(95)00001-1.
  44. Staff of The Seattle Times, 2022. A guide to military vehicles used in the Russia-Ukraine war. The Seattle Times. https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/a-guide-to-military-vehicles-used-in-the-russia-ukraine-war/(Accessed 11 April 2025).
  45. Surma, J., 2024. Deep learning in military applications. Safety, Defense, 10, pp 1–7. DOI: 10.37105/sd.214.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cmc-2026-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2463-9575 | Journal ISSN: 2232-2825
Language: English, Slovenian
Page range: 49 - 62
Published on: Jul 2, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Milan Maksimovic, Anna Bohdanets, Immaculate Motsi-Omoijiade, Guido Governatori, Ivan S. Maksymov, published by General Staff of the Slovenian Armed Forces
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.