Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Analysing the Impact of Survivorship Bias on Border Security Effectiveness Cover

Analysing the Impact of Survivorship Bias on Border Security Effectiveness

Open Access
|Mar 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

Thematic Analysis Process (Adapted from Naeem at al. (2023, p 4))

Figure 2:

Conceptual Model)

Examples of Key Words

KeywordMeaning in Context
»Only successes are reported«Survivorship bias in performance metrics
»We don’t record the failures«Silencing of negative outcomes
»Public thinks everything works«Distorted public perception
»They changed the route«Need for adaptive operational tactics
»Technology failed in fog«Overestimation of tech capabilities
»Caught = success«Misleading metric for effectiveness

Themes Identified

ThemeDescription
Misleading Success MetricsMetrics focus only on positive outcomes, ignoring failures or system gaps
Underestimation of RisksRisks are underplayed due to lack of data from failed or undetected incidents
Resource Allocation ProblemsMisguided investments are made based on biased evaluations of what is effective
Neglect of Adaptive TacticsLack of recognition of changing smuggling tactics
Misguiding Public PerceptionMedia and official reports emphasize success
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cmc-2026-0008 | Journal eISSN: 2463-9575 | Journal ISSN: 2232-2825
Language: English, Slovenian
Page range: 121 - 132
Published on: Mar 31, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Özkan Kantemir, Emre Osman Birdal, Altan Özkil, published by General Staff of the Slovenian Armed Forces
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.