References
- Axe, D., 2022. As the Russian Army Digs In, A Pro-Kremlin Mercenary Company Goes On The Attack in Ukraine—And Begs For Credit, Forbes. Available at: https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidaxe/2022/10/15/as-the-russian-army-digs-in-a-pro-kremlin-mercenary-company-goes-on-the-attack-in-ukraine-and-begs-for-credit/ (Accessed: 11 December 2022).
- Butowski, P., 2022. Russia’s Secretive Long-Range Bomber Operations Against Ukraine, The Drive. Available at: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/russias-secretive-long-range-bomber-operations-against-ukraine (Accessed: 11 December 2022).
- CEPA Task Group, 2021. The CEPA Military Mobility Project: Moving Mountain’s for Europe’s Defense. Washington, DC: Center for European Policy Analysis (CEPA).
- Gustafsson, J., Rydqvist, J., and Dalsjö, R., 2019. Deterrence by reinforcement: The strengths and weaknesses of NATO’s evolving defence strategy. Edited by E.H. Frisell. FOI.
- Hodges, B., and Lawrence, T., 2020. Reinforcing the Baltic Region in Crisis and War. Tallinn, Estonia: International Centre for Defence and Security.
- ‘Joint Publication 3-05.1: Joint Special Operations Task Force Operations’ 2007. US Joint Staff.
- Kulesa, Ł., 2018. The Future of Conventional Arms Control in Europe, Survival, 60(4), pp 75–90. DOI: 10.1080/00396338.2018.1495430.
- Foerster, S., 2002. The Changing International Context, in J. A. Larsen (ed.) Arms control: cooperative security in a changing environment. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers, pp 41-54.
- Levy, J. S., 1998. The Causes of War and the Conditions of Peace, Annual Review of Political Science, 1(1), pp 139-165. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.139.
- Lippert, W., 2023. A European Military Balance Organization and Dynamic Conventional Arms Control, Bulletin of ‘Carol I’ National Defense University, 3, pp 41–59. Available at: https://doi.org/10.53477/2284-9378-23-31(Accessed: 16 December 2022).
- Lippert, W., 2024. How conventional arms control failures caused the Russo-Ukraine War, Defense & Security Analysis, pp 1–23. DOI: 10.1080/14751798.2024.2300889.
- Lippert, W., forthcoming. Delegation to Treaty Bodies and International Organizations for Conventional Arms Control Agreements in Europe: A Sum Score Evaluation, Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations.
- Lowy Institute Asia Power Index, no date. Lowy Institute Asia Power Index. Available at: https://power.lowyinstitute.org/compare/?countries=singapore,malaysia, https://power. lowyinstitute.org/data/military-capability/armed-forces/, https://power.lowyinstitute.org/data/military-capability/armed-forces/organisation-combat-experience/, https://power.lowyinstitute.org/countries/china/, https://power.lowyinstitute.org/ (Accessed: 16 December 2022).
- Meisel, C., Moyer, J. D., and Gutberlet, S., 2020. How Do You Actually Measure Military Capability? Modern War Institute. Available at: https://mwi.usma.edu/how-do-you-actually-measure-military-capability/ (Accessed: 16 December 2022).
- Military Strength Comparisons for 2022, no date. Global Firepower. Available at: https://www.globalfirepower.com/countries-comparison.php (Accessed: 16 December 2022).
- Posen, B. R., 1984. ‘Measuring the European Conventional Balance: Coping with Complexity in Threat Assessment’, International Security, 9(3), pp 47–88. DOI: 10.2307/2538587.
- Rohn, L. L., 1990. Conventional forces in Europe: a new approach to the balance, stability, and arms control. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp.
- Russian Foreign Ministry, 2021. Treaty between The United States of America and the Russian Federation on security guarantees. Available at: https://mid.ru/ru/foreign_policy/rso/nato/1790818/ (Accessed: 16 December 2022).
- Shurkin, M., 2017. The Abilities of the British, French, and German Armies to Generate and Sustain Armored Brigades in the Baltics. RAND Corporation. DOI: 10.7249/RR1629.
- Skypek, T. M., 2010. ‘Evaluating Military Balances Through the Lens of Net Assessment: History and Application’, Journal of Military and Strategic Studies, 12(2). Available at: https://jmss.org/article/view/57875 (Accessed: 16 December 2022).
- Tirpak, J. A., 1999. ‘With Stealth in the Balkans’, Air & Space Forces Magazine, 1 October. Available at: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/article/1099stealth/ (Accessed: 11 December 2022).
- Van Evera, S., 1999. Causes of War. Ithica and London: Cornell University Press. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctt24hg70 (Accessed: 12 June 2022).
- Watts, B., 2017. Analytic Criteria for Judgments, Decisions, and Assessments. Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments (CSBA).
- Wilcox, M. R., 2020. The Treaty on Conventional Armed Forces in Europe and Russian Foreign and Security Policy (Dissertation). Manhattan, Kansas: Kansas State University.
- Zabrodskyi, M., Watling, J., Danylyuk, O. V., and Reynold, N., 2022. Preliminary Lessons in Conventional Warfighting from Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine: February–July 2022. London: Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) (RUSI Special Report).
- Zaloga, S. J., and Laurier, J., 2009. M1 Abrams vs T-72 Ural. Oxford: Osprey Publishing.
- Zanella, J. A., 2012. Combat Power Analysis is Combat Power Density. Fort Leavenworth, Kansas: United States Army Command and General Staff College.
Language: English, Slovenian
Page range: 103 - 117
Published on: Apr 2, 2024
Published by: General Staff of the Slovenian Armed Forces
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2024 William Lippert, published by General Staff of the Slovenian Armed Forces
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.