Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Clustering and Analysing Relevant Policy Dimensions of Populist, Left-Wing, Centrist, and Right-Wing Parties across Europe Cover

Clustering and Analysing Relevant Policy Dimensions of Populist, Left-Wing, Centrist, and Right-Wing Parties across Europe

By: Elena Cossu  
Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. Abromeit, J. (2017). A critical review of recent literature on populism. Politics and Governance. Cogitatio Press. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.1146
  2. Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014). How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600
  3. Art, D. (2020). The Myth of Global Populism. Perspectives on Politics, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592720003552
  4. Benczes, I. (2018). From goulash communism to goulash populism: the unwanted legacy of Hungarian reform socialism: Post-Communist Economies: Vol 28, No 2. Post-Communist Economies, 28(2), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2015.1124557
  5. Browning, C. S. (2020). Remaking Europe in the Margins. Routledge.
  6. Castanheira, M., Crutzen, B., & Sahuguet, N. (2010). The impact of party organization on electoral outcomes. Revue Economique, 61(4), 677–696. https://doi.org/10.3917/RECO.614.0677
  7. Castanho Silva, B. (2017). Contemporary Populism: Actors, Causes, and Consequences Across 28 Democracies.
  8. Conniff, M. L. (1982). Introduction: Toward a Comparative Definition of Populism. In Latin American Populism in Comparative Perspective. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
  9. Cooper, R., & Williamson, J. (1994). The Political Economy of Policy Reform. Foreign Affairs, 73(3), 154. https://doi.org/10.2307/20046681
  10. Cunningham, S. (2021). Causal Inference : The Mixtape. Yale University Press.
  11. Dornbusch, R., & Edwards, S. (1989). Macroeconomic Populism in Latin America. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  12. Dornbusch, R., & Edwards, S. (1990). Macroeconomic populism. Journal of Development Economics, 32(2), 247–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(90)90038-D
  13. Funke, M., Schularick, M., Trebesch, C., Manow, P., Gyöngyösi, G., Scholl, A., … Verner, E. (2020). Populist Leaders and the Economy. Kiel Working Paper.
  14. Giebler, H., Meyer, T. M., & Wagner, M. (2021). The changing meaning of left and right: supply- and demand-side effects on the perception of party positions. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31(2), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2019.1609001/SUPPL_FILE/FBEP_A_1609001_SM9809.DOCX
  15. Golder, M. (2016, May 11). Far Right Parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science. Annual Reviews Inc. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042814-012441
  16. Gorton, M., Douarin, E., Davidova, S., & Latruffe, L. (2008). Attitudes to agricultural policy and farming futures in the context of the 2003 CAP reform: A comparison of farmers in selected established and new Member States. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.10.001
  17. Guriev, S., & Papaioannou, E. (2020). The Political Economy of Populism. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3542052
  18. Győrffy, D. (2021). The middle-income trap in Central and Eastern Europe in the 2010s: institutions and divergent growth models. Comparative European Politics, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/S41295-021-00264-3/FIGURES/11
  19. Hawkins, K. A., Aguilar, R., Castanho Silva, B., Jenne, E. K., Kocijan, B., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2021). Measuring Populist Discourse : The Global Populism Database.
  20. Hawkins, K. A., Carlin, R. E., Littvay, L., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2019a). The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis. CRC Press (1st ed.).
  21. Hawkins, K. A., Carlin, R. E., Littvay, L., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2019b). The Ideational Approach to Populism: Concept, Theory, and Analysis. Routledge.com.
  22. Hawkins, K. A., Riding, S., & Mudde, C. (2012). Political Concepts Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper Series Measuring Populist Attitudes.
  23. Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2017). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
  24. Huber, J., & Inglehart, R. (2016). Expert Interpretations of Party Space and Party Locations in 42 Societies: Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/1354068895001001004, 1(1), 73–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001004
  25. Inglehart, R. F., & Norris, P. (2016). Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism: Economic Have-Nots and Cultural Backlash. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network.
  26. Kaufman, R. R., & Stallings, B. (1991). The Political Economy of Latin American Populism. In The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America (pp. 15–43).
  27. Kumlin, S., & Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2014). How welfare states shape the democratic public : policy feedback, participation, voting and attitudes. Edwar Elgar Publishing.
  28. Kyle, J., & Gultchin, L. (2018). Populists in Power Around the World.
  29. Likas, A., Vlassis, N., & J. Verbeek, J. (2003). The global k-means clustering algorithm. Pattern Recognition, 36(2), 451–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-3203(02)00060-2
  30. Lütz, S., & Kranke, M. (2014). The European rescue of the Washington Consensus? EU and IMF lending to Central and Eastern European countries. Review of International Political Economy, 21(2), 310–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.747104
  31. Martin, J. P. (2017). Continuity or Disruption? Changing Elites and the Emergence of Cronyism after the Great Recession – the Case of Hungary. Corvinus Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.14267/cjssp.2017.3S.11
  32. Matheson, C. (2016). Politics and Public Policy. Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_1407-1
  33. Meijers, M. J., & Zaslove, A. (2021). Measuring Populism in Political Parties: Appraisal of a New Approach. Comparative Political Studies, 54(2), 372–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414020938081
  34. Meyer, T. M., & Wagner, M. (2020). Perceptions of parties’ left-right positions: The impact of salience strategies. Party Politics, 26(5), 664–674. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818806679
  35. Mouffe, C. (2019). For A Left Populism. Verso.
  36. Mudde, C. (2004). The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
  37. Norris, P. (2020). Measuring populism worldwide. Party Politics, 26(6), 697–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068820927686
  38. Pierson, P. (1996). The New Politics of the Welfare State. World Politics, 48(2), 143–179. https://doi.org/10.1353/WP.1996.0004
  39. Rodrik, D. (2017). Populism and the Economics of Globalization. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  40. Rooduijn, M., Van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., … Taggart, P. (2020, July 9). The PopuList. The PopuList.
  41. Rovira Kaltwasser, C., Taggart, P., Ochoa Espejo, P., & Ostiguy, P. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford University Press.
  42. Schulz, A., Müller, P., Schemer, C., Wirz, D. S., Wettstein, M., & Wirth, W. (2018). Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30(2), 316–326. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw037
  43. Stadelmann-Steffen, I., & Eder, C. (2021). Public opinion in policy contexts. A comparative analysis of domestic energy policies and individual policy preferences in Europe. International Political Science Review, 42(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120913047/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_0192512120913047-FIG3.JPEG
  44. Sushytska, J. (2010). What Is Eastern Europe? Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/0969725X.2010.536010, 15(3), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969725X.2010.536010
  45. Tharanga, S. A. R. (2018). The Impact of Politics in Policy Reforms.
  46. Toplišek, A. (2019). The Political Economy of Populist Rule in Post-Crisis Europe: Hungary and Poland. New Political Economy, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598960
  47. Toplišek, A. (2020). The Political Economy of Populist Rule in Post-Crisis Europe: Hungary and Poland. New Political Economy, 25(3), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598960
  48. Welzel, C., & Inglehart, R. F. (2016). Misconceptions of Measurement Equivalence: Time for a Paradigm Shift. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/0010414016628275, 49(8), 1068–1094. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016628275
  49. Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. N. (2016). Public Opinion and Public Policy. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228637.013.74
  50. Wuttke, A., Schimpf, C., & Schoen, H. (2020). When the Whole Is Greater than the Sum of Its Parts: On the Conceptualization and Measurement of Populist Attitudes and Other Multidimensional Constructs. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000807
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 54
Submitted on: Nov 24, 2021
Accepted on: Jan 31, 2023
Published on: Jun 1, 2023
Published by: University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Elena Cossu, published by University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.