Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Stimuli contributing to local property taxation – with the focus on spatial effects of industry and functional urban areas Cover

Stimuli contributing to local property taxation – with the focus on spatial effects of industry and functional urban areas

Open Access
|Apr 2021

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 19(6), 716–723.
  2. Allers, M. A., & Elhorst, J. P. (2005). Tax Mimicking and Yardstick Competition Among Local Governments in the Netherlands. International Tax and Public Finance. 12(4), 493–513 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-1500-x.
  3. Baskaran, T. (2014). Identifying local tax mimicking with administrative borders and a policy reform. Journal of Public Economics. 118(C), 41–51.
  4. Bastida, F., Benito, B., Guillamón, M. D., & Ríos, A. M. (2019). Tax mimicking in Spanish municipalities: expenditure spillovers. Yardstick competition or tax competition? Public Sector Economics. 43(2), 115–139.
  5. Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior: Vote seeking, tax setting and yardstick competition. American Economic Review, 85(1), 25–45.
  6. Bordignon, M., Cerniglia, F., & Revelli, F. (2003). In search of yardstick competition: a spatial analysis of Italian municipality property tax setting. Journal of Urban Economics. 54(2), 199–217.
  7. Bordignon, M., Cerniglia, F., & Revelli, F. (2004). Yardstick competition in intergovernmental relationships: theory and empirical predictions. Economic Letters. 83(3), 325–333.
  8. Buettner, T., & von Schwerin, A. (2016). Yardstick competition and partial coordination: Exploring the empirical distribution of local business tax rates. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 124, 178–201.
  9. Copernicus Programme. (2020). CORINE Land Cover. [online]. [cit.2020-01-29]. Available from https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover.
  10. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 74(366), 427–431.
  11. Dubois, E., & Paty, S. (2010). Yardstick competition: which neighbours matter? The Annals of Regional Science. 44(3), 433–452.
  12. Fossen, F., Mergele, L., & Pardo, N. (2017). Fueling fiscal interactions: commodity price shocks and local government spending in Colombia. International Tax and Public Finance. 4(4), 616–651.
  13. Gerard, M., Jayet, H., & Paty, S. (2010). Tax interactions among Belgian municipalities: Do interregional differences matter? Regional Science and Urban Economics. 40(5), 336–342.
  14. Goeminne, S., & Smolders, C. (2015). Local Tax Rates. Politics and Omitted Variable Bias. Lex Localis. 3(4), 933–951.
  15. Granger, C. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424–438.
  16. Granger, C. (1988). Some recent development in a concept of causality. Journal of Econometrics. 39(1–2), 199–211.
  17. Gretl. (2019). Gnu Regression, Econometrics and Time-series Library. [online]. [cit.2019-12-29]. Available from http://gretl.sourceforge.net.
  18. John, P. (1999). Ideas and interests; agendas and implementation: an evolutionary explanation of policy change in British local government finance. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 1(1) 39–62.
  19. Klien, M. (2015). The political side of public utilities: How opportunistic behaviour and yardstick competition shape water prices in Austria. Papers in Regional Science. 94(4), 869–890.
  20. Latislav, R. (2020). Dolní Morava zvedla daň z nemovitosti na pětinásobek, těží ze ski resortu. [online]. [cit.2020-2-29]. Available from https://www.idnes.cz/pardubice/zpravy/dolni-morava-danz-nemovitosti-pardubicky-kraj-resort-sneznik.A200117_144347_pardubice-zpravy_lati.
  21. Małkowska, A., Telega, A., Głuszak, M., & Marona, B. (2018). Spatial interdependence in property taxation: the case of Polish municipalities. Equilibrium. 13(2), 265–283.
  22. MFCR - Ministry of Finance of The Czech Republic. (2020). Monitor – an information portal of the Ministry of Finance of The Czech Republic. [online]. [cit.2020-2-21]. Available from https://monitor.statnipokladna.cz.
  23. OECD. (2012). Redefining “Urban”: A New Way to Measure Metropolitan Areas. [online]. [cit.2020-1-15]. Available from https://www.oecdilibrary.org/urban-rural-and-regional-development/redefining-urban_9789264174108-en.
  24. OECD. (2020). FUA list. [online]. [cit.2020-1-10]. Available from https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/functionalurbanareasbycountry.htm.
  25. Ollé Solé, A. (2003). Electoral accountability and tax mimicking: the effects of electoral margins coalition government and ideology. European Journal of Political Economy, 19(4), 685–713.
  26. Otta, E. (2009). Nejvyšší daň schválili v Temelíně. [online]. [cit.2020-1-25]. Available from https://ceskobudejovicky.denik.cz/zpravy_region/nejvyssi-dan-schvalili-v-temeline20091229.html.
  27. QGIS. (2019). QGIS project. [online]. [cit.2019-12-25]. Available from https://www.qgis.org/en/site.
  28. Revelli, F., & Tovmo, P. (2007) Revealed yardstick competition: Local government efficiency patterns in Norway. Journal of Urban Economics. 62(1), 121–134.
  29. Said, S. E., & Dickey, D. A. (1984). Testing for Unit Roots in Autoregressive-Moving Average Models of Unknown Order. Biometrika, 71(3), 599–607.
  30. Sedmihradská, L. (2013). Yardstick Competition in Case of the Czech Property Tax. Review of Economic Perspectives. 13(2), 77–91.
  31. Sedmihradská, L., & Bakoš, E. (2015). Who Applies the Real Estate Tax`s Local Coefficient? In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Public Finance 2015. Praha: Oeconomica.
  32. Schneider, M. (1987). Local Budgets and the Maximization of Local Property Wealth in the System of Suburban Government. The Journal of Politics. 49(4), 1104–1116.
  33. Smith, S., Bryson, P., & Cornia, G. (2011). The view from city hall: Local perceptions of intergovernmental fiscal relations in the Czech Republic. Communist and Post-Communist Studies. 44(1), 99–110.
  34. Sokolow, A. (1998). The Changing Property Tax and State-Local Relations. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 28(1), 165–187.
  35. Zdražil, P., & Pernica, B. (2018). Property Tax and Quality of Life in the Czech Municipalities: Does the Policy of Raising Local Coefficient Imply Potential or Risk for Development? Review of Economic Perspectives. 18(2), 123–136.
Language: English
Page range: 55 - 66
Submitted on: May 20, 2020
Accepted on: Jan 20, 2021
Published on: Apr 6, 2021
Published by: University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Pavel Zdražil, Bohuslav Pernica, published by University of Matej Bel in Banska Bystrica, Faculty of Economics
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.