Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Ridesharing in the Polish Experience: A Study using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology Cover

Ridesharing in the Polish Experience: A Study using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Agatz, N., Erera, A., Savelsbergh, M., & Wang, X. (2012). Optimization for dynamic ride-sharing: A review. British Journal of Psychology, 223(2), 295–303.
  2. Amirkiaee, S. Y., & Evangelopoulus, N. (2018). Why do people rideshare? An experimental study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55, 9–24.
  3. Basbeth, F. (2017). Introduction to PLS SEM [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fghLbmkzC6g
  4. Bauer, D. (2017). Opportunities and barriers of ride-sharing in work commuting – a case study in Sweden (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1110033/FULLTEXT01.pdf
  5. Benleulmi, A. Z., & Blecker, T. (2017). Investigating the factors influencing the acceptance of fully autonomous cars. In Digitalization in supply chain management and logistics: Smart and digital solutions for an industry 4.0 environment. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL) 23 (pp. 99–115). Berlin, Germany: epubli GmbH.
  6. BlaBlaCar. (2016). Entering the trust age (Report). Retrieved from https://blog.blablacar.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/entering-the-trust-age.pdf
  7. Blanco, M., Atwood, J., Russell, S. M., Trimble, T., McClafferty, J. A., & Perez, M. A. (2016). Automated vehicle crash rate comparison using naturalistic data (Report of the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute). Retrieved from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu
  8. Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010, September). What's mine is yours. The rise of collaborative consumption. Retrieved from http://tantor-marketing-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/sellsheets/1920_MineIsYours.pdf
  9. Chan, N. D., & Shaheen, S. A. (2012). Ridesharing in North America: Past, present, and future. Transport Reviews, 32(1), 93–112.
  10. Ciasullo, M. V., Maione, G., Torre, C., & Troisi, O. (2017). The growth of carpooling: Insights from a social media investigation. In Proceedings of the 20th Excellence in Services International Conference (pp. 183–195). Verona, Italy: University of Verona.
  11. Ciasullo, M. V., Troisi, O., Loia, F., & Maione, G. (2018). Carpooling: travelers’ perceptions from a big data analysis. The TQM Journal, 30(5), 554–571.
  12. Cohen, B., & Kietzmann, J. (2014). Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organization & Environment, 27(3), 279–296.
  13. Constantiou, I., Marton, A., & Tuunainen, V. K. (2017). Four models of sharing economy platforms. MIS Quarterly Executive, 16(4), 231–251.
  14. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.
  15. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
  16. Dewan, K. K., & Ahmad, I. (2007). Carpooling: A step to reduce congestion. Engineering Letters, 14(1), 61–66.
  17. Dybalski, J., Mosiej, M., Puzyński, J., Syryjczyk, T., & Grobelny, M. (2017). Parkingi a transport zbiorowy w miastach (Report TOR & POBP). Retrieved from http://www.pobp.org.pl/images/demo/docs/Raport_parkingowy.pdf
  18. Felson, M., & Spaeth, J. L. (1978). Community structure and collaborative consumption: A routine activity approach. American Behavioural Scientist, 21(4), 614–624.
  19. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  20. Frenken, K., & Schor, J. (2017). Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 3–10.
  21. Frost & Sullivan (2016). Report of the future of carsharing market to 2025. Retrieved from http://www.frost.com/sublib/display-report.do?id=MB4D-01-00-00-00
  22. Furuhata, M., Dessouky, M., Ordóñez, F., Brunet, M. E., Wang, X., & Koenig, S. (2013). Ridesharing: The state-of-the-art and future directions. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 57, 28–46.
  23. Garson, G. D. (2016). Partial least squares: Regression and structural equation models. Asheboro, NC: Statistical Associates Publishers.
  24. Geron, T. (2013, September 19). California becomes first state to regulate ridesharing services Lyft, Sidecar, UberX [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomiogeron/2013/09/19/california-becomes-first-state-to-regulate-ridesharing-services-lyft-sidecar-uberx/#27f53d218049
  25. Gyódi, K. (2017). Airbnb and the hotel industry in Warsaw: An example of the sharing economy? Central European Economic Journal, 2(49), 23–34.
  26. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In R. R. Sinkovics & P. N. Ghauri (Ed.), New challenges to international marketing (Advances in international marketing, p. 20). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  27. Hubona, G. S. (2010). Structural equation modeling using smartPLS [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ax3Z50-JI-k
  28. Indrawati, I., & Riyadi, S. (2016, January). Factors affecting consumers’ decision toward kios tiket mandiri adoption in purchasing train tickets in Indonesia. In eProceeding of ISCLO (International Seminar and Conference on Learning Organization (pp. 118–127). Retrieved from https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/home/epublication/id/128.html
  29. Jittrapirom, P., Caiati, V., Feneri, A. M., Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S., Alonso-González, M. J., & Narayan, J. (2017). Mobility as a service: A critical review of definitions, assessments of schemes, and key challenges. Urban Planning, 2(2), 13–25.
  30. Kamargianni, M., & Matyas, M. (2017, January 8–12). The business ecosystem of mobility as a service. In Proceedings from the 96th Transportation Research Board (TRB) Annual Meeting. Retrieved from https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10037890/
  31. Korkmazoglu, O. B., & Kemalbay, G. (2012). Econometrics application of partial least squares regression: An endogenous growth model for Turkey. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 62, 906–910.
  32. Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The Technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29(3), 269–282.
  33. Ma, S., & Wolfson, O. (2013, November). Analysis and evaluation of the slugging form of ridesharing. In Proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (pp. 64–73). Orlando, FL: ACM Digital Library.
  34. Małecka, A., & Mitręga, M. (2015). Uwarunkowania uczestnictwa w tzw. ride sharing (wspólnych przejazdach) – wyniki badań użytkowników Blablacar. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Problemy Zarządzania, Finansów i Marketingu, 41, 153–164.
  35. Massaro, D. W., Chaney, B., Bigler, S., Lancaster, J., Iyer, S., Gawade, M., Eccleston, M., Gurrola, E., & Lopez, A. (2009). Just-in-Time Carpooling without Elaborate Preplanning. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 219–224). Santa Cruz, CA: University of California.
  36. Merat, N., Madigan, R., & Nordhoff, S. (2017). Human factors, user requirements, and user acceptance of ride-sharing in automated vehicles (International Transport Forum Discussion Papers, No. 2017/10). Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
  37. Moon, J. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217–230.
  38. Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.
  39. Olszewski, R., Pałka, P., & Turek, A. (2018). Solving ‘Smart City’ transport problems by designing carpooling gamification schemes with multi-agent systems: The case of the so-called “Mordor of Warsaw”. Sensors, 18(1), 141.
  40. Pietrewicz, J. W., & Sobiecki, R. (2016). Przedsiębiorczość sharing economy. In M. Poniatowska-Jaksch & R. Sobiecki (Eds.), Sharing economy (gospodarka współdzielenia) (pp. 11–26). Warsaw, Poland: Oficyna Wydawnicza SGH.
  41. PwC. (2016). (Współ)dziel i rządź. Ekonomia współdzielenia. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.pl/pl/publikacje/2016/wspol-dziel-i-rzadz-sharing-economy.html
  42. PwC. (2018). Wzrost znaczenia usług car sharing impulsem dla rozwoju elektromobilności. Retrieved from https://www.pwc.pl/pl/artykuly/2018/wzrost-znaczenia-uslug-car-sharing-impulsem-dla-rozwoju-elektromobilnosci.html
  43. Raman, A., & Don, Y. (2013). Preservice teachers’ acceptance of learning management software: An application of the UTAUT2 model. International Education Studies, 6(7), 157–164.
  44. Rinne, A. (2015, February 4). The sharing economy, trough a broader lens. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Retrieved from https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_sharing_economy_through_a_broader_lens
  45. Schor, J. (2016). Debating the sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 4(3), 7–22.
  46. Shaheen, S., & Cohen, A. (2018). Is it time for a public transit renaissance? navigating travel behaviour, technology, and business model shifts in a brave new world. Journal of Public Transportation, 21(1), 8.
  47. Shaheen, S., Stocker, A., & Mundler, M. (2017). Online and app-based carpooling in France: Analyzing users and practices - A study of BlaBlaCar. In G. Meyer & S. Shaheen (Eds.), Disrupting mobility (pp. 181–196). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
  48. Sharfuddin, S. (2020). The world after Covid-19. The round table. The Commonwealth Journal of International Affairs, 109(3), 247–257.
  49. Slade, E. L., Williams, M. D., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2013). Mobile payment adoption: Classification and review of the extant literature. The Marketing Review, 13(2), 167–190.
  50. Sluglines. (2020). Connecting drivers and riders for better commute [Mobile application software]. Retrieved from https://sluglines.com/
  51. SmartPLS. (2020). Smart PLS software. Retrieved from https://www.smartpls.com/free-trial
  52. Smith, A. (2016). Shared, collaborative and on demand: The new digital economy (Pew Research Center Report). Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/05/19/the-new-digital-economy/
  53. Smolnicki, P. M. (2017). Mobility oriented development (MOD): Public-private partnership in urban parking and traffic management with the use of autonomous automobiles, car-sharing, ridesharing modes of transport and mobility as a service (MaaS). In A. Brdulak & H. Brdulak (Ed.), Happy city – How to plan and create the best livable area for the people (pp. 207–220). New York City, NY: Springer International Publishing.
  54. Solaris. (2018). Technical specification of Solaris Urbino city buses. Retrieved from http://www.solaris-club.com/solaris-u3.php
  55. SUMC. (2018). What is shared-use mobility? Report of the shared-use mobility center. Retrieved from http://sharedusemobilitycenter.org/what-is-shared-mobility
  56. Tenenhaus, M., Pages, J., Ambroisine, L., & Guinot, C. (2005). PLS methodology to study relationships between hedonic judgements and product characteristics. Food Quality and Preference, 16(4), 315–325.
  57. Tóth, Á., & Szigeti, C. (2019). Example of a German free-float car-sharing company expansion in east-central Europe. Resources, 8(4), 172.
  58. Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315.
  59. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
  60. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
  61. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157–178.
  62. Virkus, H. (2017). Ridesharing companies’ best practices for global expansion (Master's thesis). Retrieved from https://mi.ee/sites/default/files/blogid/hannes_virkus.pdf
  63. What is ride-sharing. (2018). Government of Canada. Retrieved from https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/programs/about-canada-revenue-agency-cra/compliance/ride-sharing.html
  64. Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 42, 719–729.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ceej-2020-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2543-6821 | Journal ISSN: 2544-9001
Language: English
Page range: 279 - 299
Published on: Dec 18, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2020 Stefan Cylwik, Renata Gabryelczyk, Marcin Chlebus, published by Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.