Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Sustainable Lightweight Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Recycled Waste Glass: Influence of Particle Size and Replacement Levels on Performance Cover

Sustainable Lightweight Self-Compacting Concrete Incorporating Recycled Waste Glass: Influence of Particle Size and Replacement Levels on Performance

Open Access
|Oct 2026

Figures & Tables

Table 1:

Chemical analysis (according to IQS No.472/2019)

Oxide %Ordinary Portland cement (OPC)Limits IQS No.
CaO60.41-
Si2O21.84-
AL2O34.72-
Fe2O33.60-
MgO1.50≤5%
SO32.38≤2.5% if C3A < 5% or ≤ 2.8% if C3A >5%
L.O.I3.27≤4%
Free lime %1.12-
Insoluble residue %1.12≤1.5%
L.S.F0.830.66–1.02
Compounds
C3S %31.74-
C2S %38.67-
C3A %6.42-
C4AF %10.95-
Initial setting time (hour: min.)2.0800:45 (Min.)
Final setting time (hour: min.)4:3010:00 (Max.)
Fineness (Blaine) in m2/kg425230 (Min.)
Compressive strength (MPa) at 3 days / 7days16 / 2315 (Min.) / 23 (Min.)
Figure 1:

Grading of sand

Table 2:

Chemical analysis of glass

OxidesSiO2MgOCaOAl2O3Fe2O3Na2OSO3CuOZnO
Oxides content (Wt.%)72.53.7210.20.700.319.90.2440.2270.133
Figure 2:

Coarse and fine glass

Table 3:

Chemical properties of fly ash and limestone powder

Test ItemsFly ash [%]ASTM 618-05Limestone
SiO2506.84
Al2O3311.12
CaO545.73
MgO0.284.37
SO31.3≤5%3.2
Fe2O37.40.24
TiO21.6
K2O1.3
P2O30.9
SiO2, Al2O3 and Fe2O388≥70%
L.O.I8≤12%37.12
Activity Index76≥75%
Figure 3:

Attapulgite aggregate

Figure 4:

Grading of attapulgite aggregate

Figure 5:

Treated attapulgite by cement paste

Table 4:

Quantities of mixed materials [kg\m3]

Mix codeCFALPww\bCAFAGWSp %
G045050201550.3160050001.4
GC10%45050201550.31600450501.37
GC20%45050201550.316004001001.35
GC30%45050201550.316003501501.42
GC40%45050201550.316003002001.45
GF10%45050201550.31600450501.43
GF20%45050201550.316004001001.48
GF30%45050201550.316003501501.52
GF40%45050201550.316003002001.57
Figure 6:

Moulds used in this study

Figure 7:

Fresh test apparatus: (a) Slump flow ana T500mm, (b) V-funnel, and (c) L-box

Figure 8:

Mechanical tests: (d) Compressive strength, (e) Splitting tensile strength, (f) Flexural strength, (g) Modulus of elasticity, and (h) Impact strength

Figure 9:

Durability test setup: (a) Sorptivity, and (b) Alkali–silica reaction (ASR) expansion

Table 5:

Fresh properties of LWSCC mixtures

Mix codeFresh properties
Slump [mm]Sp%T500 sec.V-funnel sec.L-boxFresh density [Kg/m3]
G07201.402.837.60.951890
GC10%7201.372.807.70.961886
GC20%7251.352.747.90.981878
GC30%7151.422.907.70.931865
GC40%7001.453.667.50.901852
GF10%7151.432.947.80.961881
GF20%7051.483.108.00.941872
GF30%6971.523.228.20.921860
GF40%6851.573.288.70.891846
Figure 10:

Slump flow and Sp in GC mixtures

Figure 11:

Slump flow and Sp in GF mixtures

Figure 12:

T500mm results

Figure 13:

Experimental results of v-funnel test

Figure 14:

Experimental results of L-Box test

Figure 15:

Experimental results of fresh density test

Table 6:

Equilibrium density results

Mix codeG0GC10GC20GC30GC40GF10GF20GF30GF40
Equilibrium density [Kg/m3]164616371633162616201633162416191594
Figure 16:

Experimental results of equilibrium density test

Table 7:

Results of compressive strength at 7, 28 and 90 days

Mix codeCompressive strength [MPa]
7 d28 d90 d
G025.1130.0332.63
GC1024.4029.4331.73
GC2023.8928.6731.15
GC3023.1428.1230.60
GC4022.5127.4429.72
GF1025.7331.4332.50
GF2025.9332.2133.18
GF3025.4231.2632.31
GF4024.7830.0731.61
Figure 17:

Results of compressive strength at 7, 28 and 90 days

Table 8:

Results of splitting strength test

Mix codeSplitting strength (MPa)
7d28d90d
G02.243.413.68
GC102.213.303.62
GC202.173.233.58
GC302.013.143.51
GC401.873.043.46
GF102.273.533.77
GF202.363.613.82
GF302.213.483.71
GF402.103.363.65
Figure 18:

Results of splitting strength test

Table 9:

Results of flexural strength test

Mix codeFlexural strength [MPa]
7 d28 d90 d
G03.74.304.62
GC103.684.124.52
GC203.584.064.44
GC303.443.914.31
GC403.373.844.26
GF103.964.584.71
GF204.004.714.84
GF303.664.274.55
GF403.544.114.39
Figure 19:

Flexural strength results

Table 10:

Results of modulus of elasticity test

Mix codeModulus of elasticity (GPa)
28d90d
G016.7417.96
GC1016.2217.35
GC2015.8717.18
GC3015.4216.76
GC4015.1616.46
GF1017.6217.82
GF2017.8418.32
GF3017.3117.87
GF4016.9017.46
Figure 20:

Results of modulus of elasticity test

Table 11:

Results of the impact resistance test

Mix codeImpact resistance (No. of blow)
7 days28 days90 days
N1NfN1NfN1Nf
NC71216242633
GC1091517242535
GC2091215222333
GC3061014192231
GC406814172129
GF1061519283038
GF2091221303342
GF30121620283138
GF40122124303237
Figure 21:

Results of impact resistance test

Table 12:

Results of water absorption test

Mix codeWater absorption [%]
7 d28 d90 d
G09.268.297.32
GC109.488.417.47
GC209.828.867.68
GC309.399.117.94
GC409.779.568.22
GF108.657.927.12
GF208.377.87.04
GF308.898.117.26
GF409.148.467.41
Figure 22:

Results of water absorption test

Table 13:

Results of sorptivity test

Mix codeSorptivity [mm\sec0.5]
7 d28 d90 d
G00.0680.0520.046
GC100.0730.0570.053
GC200.0790.0620.057
GC300.0830.0730.061
GC400.0870.0780.064
GF100.0640.0480.041
GF200.0610.0460.038
GF300.0680.0520.045
GF400.0710.0570.053
Figure 23:

Results of sorptivity test

Table 14:

Alkali-silica reaction test

Mix codeG0GC10GC20GC30GC40GF10GF20GF30GF40
Expansion %0.240.230.200.170.140.210.180.150.13
Figure 24:

Results of alkali-silica reaction test with ASTM 1260 limits

Figure 25:

SEM of LWSCC with coarse glass (GC mixture)

Figure 26:

SEM of LWSCC with fine glass (GF mixture)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2027-0025 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 (formerly 1336-5835) | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Language: English
Submitted on: Jul 28, 2026
Accepted on: Sep 8, 2026
Published on: Oct 17, 2026
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Lamyaa Ghanim Salim, Ali H. Nahhab, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.