Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Performance-Based Strain Limits for Aging Spun Pile-Supported Wharves under Long-Term Corrosion and Seismic Loading Cover

Performance-Based Strain Limits for Aging Spun Pile-Supported Wharves under Long-Term Corrosion and Seismic Loading

Open Access
|Jul 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1:

The Geometry of Structure (a) PSW-A; (b) PSW-B

Figure 2:

Spun pile cross-sections (a) Pile A with infilled concrete; (b) Pile A; (c) Piles B and C with infilled concrete; (d) Piles B and C

Figure 3:

Fiber discretization of spun pile section in FB-FEA (Refani & Nagao, 2023b)

Figure 4:

2D FB-FEA models. (a) PSW-A; (b) PSW-B

Figure 5:

p–y curve. (a) Pile A (Ø700 mm vertical); (b) Pile B (Ø600 mm vertical); (c) Pile C (Ø600 mm battered). (Refani & Nagao, 2023b)

Figure 6:

Loading schematic of non-linear static pushover analysis; (a) PSW-A; (b) PSW-B

Figure 7:

The result pushover curves of corroded spun pile: (a) PSW-A; (b) PSW-B. The distinct force reduction in PSW-B around 300 mm deck displacement indicates the onset of local stiffness degradation and severe nonlinear damage-state behavior

Figure 8:

Comparison of Ductility Ratios between PSW-A and PSW-B

Figure 9:

Strain PC Bar - Deck Displacement Relationship

Figure 10:

Strain Concrete - Deck Displacement Relationship

Material properties of PSW

SymbolDescriptionValue
fcoCover concrete compressive strength [MPa]52
ɛcoStrain at peak compressive strength of cover concrete [-]0.00275
fccCore concrete compressive strength [MPa]53.95
ɛccStrain at peak compressive strength of core concrete [-]0.00323
fcDeck and infilled concrete compressive strength [MPa]30
ɛcStrain at peak compressive strength of deck/infilled concrete [-]0.00275
fypcYield strength of PC bar [MPa]1275
fupcUltimate strength of PC bar [MPa]1420
σiniInitial stress in PC bar [MPa]781
EsElastic modulus of PC bar [MPa]190,000
fyinYield strength of infilled concrete rebar [MPa]420
fuinUltimate strength of infilled concrete rebar [MPa]620
EinElastic modulus of infilled concrete rebar [MPa]200,000

Time-dependent corrosion degree ψ adopted in the analysis_ (Refani & Nagao, 2023b)

Exposure Time [years]ψ for Pile A [%]ψ for Piles B and C [%]Interpretation
00.000.00Initial uncorroded condition
5012.2012.20Intermediate corrosion condition
7518.5618.56Long-term corrosion condition

Summary of Strain Limits per Damage Degree (PIANC, 2001)

Damage DegreeMaterialStrain Limit [-]Remarks
Degree I – ServiceableConcrete (extreme fibre compressive)0.004Minor, no significant damage
Degree I – ServiceableRebar (reinforcing bar)0.010Crack control limit
Degree I – ServiceablePrestressing strand (incremental)0.005Serviceability limit
Degree II – RepairableConcrete (pile-deck hinge)0.025Typically ∼0.007–0.025
Degree II – RepairableConcrete (in-ground hinge)0.008Typically ∼0.005–0.008
Degree II – RepairableRebar (pile–deck hinge)0.050Yield-level ductility
Degree II – RepairableRebar (in-ground hinge)0.010Serviceability-level ductility
Degree II – RepairablePrestressing strand (pile-deck hinge)0.040Post-yield limit
Degree II – RepairablePrestressing strand (in-ground hinge)0.015Pre-collapse behavior
Degree III – Near CollapseConcreteNot explicitly specified (≥ ∼0.025)Double plastic hinges at limited piles
Degree III – Near CollapseRebarNot explicitly specified, > 0.05Significant post-yield strain
Degree III – Near CollapsePrestressing strandNot explicitly specified, > 0.04Approaching failure
Degree IV – CollapseAll materialsConcrete: > ∼0.025; Rebar: > 0.050; Prestressing strand: > 0.040Complete structural failure, loss of capacity

Representative soil parameters used for p–y curve generation and numerical analysis_ (Refani & Nagao, 2023b)

Layer CodeSoil TypeN-SPT [-]Layer Thickness [m]Representative N-SPTUnit Weight γn [kN/m3]Friction Angle Φ [°]Cohesion c [kN/m2]
CL01Very Soft Clay2–43310.07641.19
CL02Soft Clay5–695.510.33742.22
SS03Silty Sand11–1941510.7522-
SS04Medium Sand28–33430.511.0930-
SS05Dense Sand35–602047.511.8934-

Stiffness Reduction Factor (η) from FB-FEA at Various Corrosion Levels (Refani & Nagao, 2023b)

PileYearsCorrosion DegreeRust Thickness of PC Bar [mm]Stiffness Reduction Factor η
Pile A00.00%0.0001.000
Pile A5012.20%0.8520.885
Pile A7518.56%1.1440.789
Piles B and C00.00%0.0001.000
Piles B and C5012.20%0.6690.950
Piles B and C7518.56%1.1440.799

Deck displacement at peak lateral resistance, Δpeak [mm]

ConfigurationCorrosion YearDeck displacement at peak lateral resistance, Δpeak [mm]Strain in PC Bar [mm/mm]Strain in Concrete [mm/mm]
PSW-A04130.0220.023
PSW-A503850.0200.021
PSW-A753720.0180.020
PSW-B03360.0350.025
PSW-B503290.0320.023
PSW-B753240.0300.022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2027-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Language: English
Submitted on: May 19, 2026
Accepted on: Jun 14, 2026
Published on: Jul 22, 2026
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2026 Afif Navir Refani, Kohar Yudoprasetyo, Mudji Irmawan Arkani, Jaya Via Dewata, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT