Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Experimental Investigation of Wall Thickness Effect on Cold Joints in a Scaled Diaphragm Wall Model Using Fiber-Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete Cover

Experimental Investigation of Wall Thickness Effect on Cold Joints in a Scaled Diaphragm Wall Model Using Fiber-Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete

Open Access
|Jan 2026

Abstract

Concrete diaphragm walls are crucial structural components for permanent retaining systems and deep excavation support. The research examines how wall thickness and cold joints influence the deformation behavior of diaphragm walls. A small laboratory model with a rigidity that is comparable to the field model was used for this purpose. The scaled model was designed to preserve the relative stiffness of the field model; however, due to the slenderness of the specimens, conventional reinforcement could not be applied. Instead, polypropylene fibers were used as an effective alternative to enhance crack resistance and ensure structural integrity. Four-point bending tests were carried out under static loading conditions using a laboratory compression testing machine. The model sizes are (40, 60, 80, and 100 mm) in prismatic thickness and overall width and length (900 mm and 2600 mm), respectively. Additional tests on 60 mm walls with one and two cold joints, and on 100 mm walls with two cold joints, were compared against joint-free specimens to assess the influence of cold joints. The findings indicate that increasing wall thickness improves load-bearing capacity and reduces lateral deformation. For proposed specimens maximizing strength gains when aspect ratio ( thicknessdepth {{thickness} \over {depth}} ) increase form 140to130 {1 \over {40}}\,\,to\,\,{1 \over {30}} and for increasing from 160to140 {1 \over {60}}\,\,to\,\,{1 \over {40}} deflection decreases sharply. Specimens with aspect ratio of 140 {1 \over {40}} one and two joints reduced ultimate load by about 3% and 15%, respectively, while at 124 {1 \over {24}} two joints caused a 10% reduction. Thinner walls proved more flexible and thus more sensitive to joint-induced weaknesses.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2026-0067 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Language: English
Submitted on: Oct 21, 2025
|
Accepted on: Nov 23, 2025
|
Published on: Jan 18, 2026
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2026 Rana F. Yousef, Haitham H. Muteb, Ahmed Al-Janabi, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

AHEAD OF PRINT