Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Numerical Comparison Among Soil Capillary Breaking Layer and Common Waterproofing Techniques Cover

Numerical Comparison Among Soil Capillary Breaking Layer and Common Waterproofing Techniques

Open Access
|Jun 2025

Abstract

Numerous damp-proof courses (DPCs) methods, including both conventional and contemporary versions, are implemented globally. This paper demonstrates the limitations of these methods. It also assesses a recently introduced waterproofing method that is based on the principles of capillary breaking layers (CBLs), which are frequently employed in earthen structures. By numerically analyzing and comparing the short- and long-term hydrothermal behavior of a few widely used DPCs with the newly proposed technique, the efficacy and affectivity of disrupting the capillary network in both short and long periods have been determined. It was difficult to distinguish the performance of concrete, bituminous, and gravel strata from the short-term studies that were conducted based on their performance. Nevertheless, the gravel layer demonstrates superior long-term performance when the proofing layer is adequately aerated.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cee-2025-0052 | Journal eISSN: 2199-6512 | Journal ISSN: 1336-5835
Language: English
Page range: 728 - 733
Published on: Jun 16, 2025
Published by: University of Žilina
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Malik H. Assi, Noor S. Taresh, Mohammed Abid Jameel, Mohammed A. Radi, published by University of Žilina
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.