EnQuad: A Publicly-Available Simulator for Quantum Key Distribution Protocols

Abdelgawad, Mohamed S.; Shenouda, Botrous A.; Abdullatif, Sameh O.

doi:10.2478/cait-2020-0002

Abstract

In this paper, we present EnQuad Version 1.0: a high-speed and expandable simulator for Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) protocols. Surpassing available simulators, EnQuad does not only simulate a QKD stack, but also does security testing and guides the researcher on which reconciliation protocol should be used in his experimental setup. On the top of that, it recommends changes for the researcher to satisfy security or a given target key-rate if any of them is not already fulfilled. Although EnQuad V1.0 is concerned with depolarizing channels and Individual Intercept-and-Resend attacks, EnQuad is featured with 24 parameters and 9 modular functions so that it could be expanded to a wide range of QKD protocols. In addition, we validated EnQuad outcomes against a comparable simulator and against theory. Furthermore, a set of 11 experiments showed that EnQuad runs 6.12× to 12.2× faster than a comparable simulator. EnQuad was implemented in MATLAB and the code is available online.

References

1. Gisin, N., et al. Quantum Cryptography. – Reviews of Modern Physics,Vol. 74, 2002, No 1, p. 145.10.1103/RevModPhys.74.145
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Chou, Y.-H., et al. Quantum Entanglement and Non-Locality Based Secure Computation for Future Communication. – IET Information Security, Vol. 5, 2011, No 1, pp. 69-79.10.1049/iet-ifs.2009.0143
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Hanschke, L., et al. Quantum Dot Single-Photon Sources with Ultra-Low Multi-Photon Probability. – NPJ Quantum Information, Vol. 4, 2018, No 1, p. 43.10.1038/s41534-018-0092-0
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Sibson, P., et al. Chip-Based Quantum Key Distribution. – Nature Communications, Vol. 8, 2017, p. 13984.10.1038/ncomms13984530976328181489
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Liao, S.-K., et al. Satellite-Relayed Intercontinental Quantum Network. – Physical Review Letters, Vol. 120, 2018, No 3, p. 030501.10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.03050129400544
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Kohnle, A., A. Rizzoli. Interactive Simulations for Quantum Key Distribution. – European Journal of Physics, Vol. 38, 2017, No 3, p. 035403.10.1088/1361-6404/aa62c8
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Niemiec, M., Ł. Romański, M. Święty. Quantum Cryptography Protocol Simulator. – In: International Conference on Multimedia Communications, Services and Security, 2011, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-21512-4_34
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Atashpendar, A., P. Ryan. Simulation and Analysis of QKD (BB84). – Interdisciplinary Center for Security, University of Luxembourg, 2014-2019. https://www.qkdsimulator.com/
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Scarani, V., R. Renner. Quantum Cryptography with Finite Resources: Unconditional Security Bound for Discrete-Variable Protocols with One-Way Postprocessing. – Physical Review Letters, Vol. 100, 2008, No 20, p. 200501.10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.20050118518517
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Abdelgawad, M. Github EnQuad Repository. 2019. https://github.com/Mo-Abdelgawad/EnQuad-a-QKD-Simulator
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Diffie, W., M. Hellman. New Directions in Cryptography. – IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 22, 1976, No 6, pp. 644-654.10.1109/TIT.1976.1055638
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Scarani, V., et al. Quantum Cryptography Protocols Robust against Photon Number Splitting Attacks for Weak Laser Pulse Implementations. – Physical Review Letters, Vol. 92, 2004, No 5, 057901.10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.05790114995344
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Lo, H.-K., X. Ma, K. Chen. Decoy State Quantum Key Distribution. – Physical Review Letters, Vol. 94, 2005, No 23, 230504.10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.23050416090452
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Jeong, Y.-C., Y.-S. Kim, Y.-H. Kim. Effects of Depolarizing Quantum Channels on BB84 and SARG04 Quantum Cryptography Protocols. – Laser Physics, Vol. 21, 2011, No 8, pp. 1438-1442.10.1134/S1054660X11150126
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Niederberger, A., V. Scarani, N. Gisin. Photon-Number-Splitting Versus Cloning Attacks in Practical Implementations of the Bennett-Brassard 1984 Protocol for Quantum Cryptography. – Physical Review A, Vol. 71, 2005, No 4, 042316.10.1103/PhysRevA.71.042316
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Lizama-Pérez, L., J. López, E. De Carlos López. Quantum Key Distribution in the Presence of the Intercept-Resend with Faked States Attack. – Entropy, Vol. 19, 2017, No 1, p. 4.10.3390/e19010004
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Elkouss, D., et al. Efficient Reconciliation Protocol for Discrete-Variable Quantum Key Distribution. – In: 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory, 2009, IEEE.10.1109/ISIT.2009.5205475
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Benletaief, N., H. Rezig, A. Bouallegue. Toward Efficient Quantum Key Distribution Reconciliation. – Journal of Quantum Information Science, Vol. 4, 2014, No 2, p. 117.10.4236/jqis.2014.42013
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Kern, O., J. M. Renes. Improved One-Way Rates for BB84 and 6-State Protocols. – arXiv preprint arXiv:0712.1494, 2007.10.26421/QIC8.8-9-6
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Mehic, M., M. Niemiec, M. Voznak. Calculation of the Key Length for Quantum Key Distribution. – Elektronika i Elektrotechnika, Vol. 21, 2015, No 6, pp. 81-85.10.5755/j01.eee.21.6.13768
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Gottesman, D., H.-K. Lo. Proof of Security of Quantum Key Distribution with Two-Way Classical Communications. – IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 49, 2003, No 2, pp. 457-475.10.1109/TIT.2002.807289
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
22. Smith, G., J. A. Smolin. Additive Extensions of a Quantum Channel. – In: Information Theory Workshop, 2008 (ITW’08), IEEE, 2008.10.1109/ITW.2008.4578688
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
23. Ekert, A. K. Quantum Cryptography Based on Bell’s Theorem. – Physical Review Letters, Vol. 67, 1991, No 6, p. 661.10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.66110044956
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
24. Hwang, T., K.-C. Lee. EPR Quantum Key Distribution Protocols with Potential 100% Qubit Efficiency. – IET Information Security, Vol. 1, 2007, No 1, pp. 43-45.10.1049/iet-ifs:20060124
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

EnQuad: A Publicly-Available Simulator for Quantum Key Distribution Protocols

Abstract

Paradigm

My account