Have a personal or library account? Click to login
On Some Knowledge Measures of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of Type Two with Application to MCDM Cover

On Some Knowledge Measures of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of Type Two with Application to MCDM

Cybernetics and Information Technologies
Volume 20 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)
By: Surender Singh,  Sumita Lalotra and  Abdul Haseeb Ganie  
Open Access
|Mar 2020

References

  1. 1. Atanassov, K. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. – Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 20, 1986, pp. 87-96.10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. 2. Atanassov, K. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of Second Type. – BUSEFAL, Vol. 56, 1993, pp. 66-70.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. 3. Atanassov, K. Geometrical Interpretation of the Elements of the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Objects. – Mathematical Foundations of Artificial Intelligence Seminar, 1989, Preprint IM-MFAIS-1-89. Reprinted: International Journal of Bioautomation, Vol. 20, 2016, pp. S27-S40.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. 4. Atanassov, K., P. Vassilev. On the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets of n-th Type. – In: Advances in Data Analysis with Computational Intelligence Methods. Springer, Cham., 2018, pp. 265-274.10.1007/978-3-319-67946-4_10
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. 5. Atanassov, K., E.Szmidt, J. Kacprzyk, P. Vassilev. – On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Pairs of n-th Type. – Advances in Data Analysis with Computational Intelligence Methods, Vol. 13, 2017, pp. 265-74.10.1007/978-3-319-67946-4_10
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. 6. Deschrijver, G., E. E. Kerre. On the Composition of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Relations. –Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 136, 2003, Issue 3, pp. 333-361.10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00269-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. 7. Garg, H. A New Generalized Improved Score Function of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Applications in Expert Systems. – Applied Soft Compuing, Vol. 38, 2016, pp. 886-920.10.1016/j.asoc.2015.10.040
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. 8. Garg, H. A Novel Correlation Coefficients between Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets and Its Applications to Decision-Making Processes. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 31, 2016, Issue 12, pp. 1234-1252.10.1002/int.21827
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. 9. Garg, H. Generalized Pythagorean Fuzzy Geometric Aggregation Operators Using Einstein t-Norm and t-Conorm for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Process. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 32, 2017, Issue 6, pp. 597-630. https://doi.org/10.1002/int.2186010.1002/int.21860
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. 10. Gou, X. J., Z. S. Xu, P. J. Ren. The Properties of Continuous Pythagorean Fuzzy Information. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 31, 2016, Issue 5, pp. 401-424.10.1002/int.21788
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. 11. Guo, K. Knowledge Measure for Atanassov’s Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. – IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 24, 2016, Issue 5, pp. 1072-1078.10.1109/TFUZZ.2015.2501434
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. 12. Hung, W. L., M. S. Yang. Fuzzy Entropy on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 21, 2006, Issue 4, pp. 443-451.10.1002/int.20131
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. 13. Hwang, C., M. S. Yang, W. L. Hung. New Similarity Measures of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Based on the Jaccard Index with Its Application to Clustering. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 33, 2018, Issue 8, pp. 1672-1688.10.1002/int.21990
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. 14. Hwang, C., K. Yoon. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications. A State of the Art Survey, New York, Springer, 1981.10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. 15. Lalotra, S., S. Singh. On a Knowledge Measure and an Unorthodox Accuracy Measure of an Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set(s) with Their Applications. – International Journal of Computational and Intelligent Systems, Vol. 11, 2018, Issue 1, pp. 1338-1356.10.2991/ijcis.11.1.99
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. 16. Li, J. Q., G. N. D e n g, H. X. Zeng, W. Y. Zeng. The Relationship between Similarity Measure and Entropy of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. – Information Sciences, Vol. 188, 2012, pp. 314-321.10.1016/j.ins.2011.11.021
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. 17. Liu, X. D., S. H. Zeng, F. L. Xiaong. Entropy and Subsethood for General Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. – International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, Vol. 3613, 2005, pp. 42-52.10.1007/11539506_6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. 18. Ma, Z. M., Z. S. Xu. Symmetric Pythagorean Fuzzy Weighted Geometric/Averaging Operators and Their Application in Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Problems. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 31, 2016, Issue 12, pp. 1198-1219.10.1002/int.21823
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. 19. Ngan, R. T., B. C. Cuong, M. Ali. H-max Distance Measure of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in Decision Making. – Applied Soft Computing, Vol. 69, 2018, pp. 393-425.10.1016/j.asoc.2018.04.036
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. 20. Nguen, H. A New Knowledge-Based Measure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Its Application in Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making. – Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 42, 2015, Issue 22, pp. 8766-8774.10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.030
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. 21. Nguyen, X. T., V. D. Ngyuen. Support-Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set: A New Concept for Soft Computing. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 7, 2015, Issue 4, pp. 11-16.10.5815/ijisa.2015.04.02
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. 22. Parvathi, R., N. Palaniappan. Some Operations on Intuionistic Fuzzy Sets of Second Type. – Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Vol. 10, 2004, pp. 1-19.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. 23. Pal, N. R., H. Bustince, M. Pagola, U. K. Mukherjee, D. P. Goswami, G. Beliakov. Uncertainties with Atanassov’s Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Fuzziness and Lack of Knowledge. – Information Sciences, Vol. 228, 2013, pp. 61-74.10.1016/j.ins.2012.11.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. 24. Peng, X. D., Y. Yang. Some Results for Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 30, 2015, Issue 11, pp. 1133-1160.10.1002/int.21738
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. 25. Peng, X. D., Y. Yang. Pythagorean Fuzzy Choquet Integral Based MABAC Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 31, 2016, Issue 10, 989-1020.10.1002/int.21814
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. 26. Peng, X., F. Smarandache. Pythagorean Fuzzy Set: State of the Art and Future Directions. – Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 52, 2017, pp. 1873-1927. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-017-9596-9.10.1007/s10462-017-9596-9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. 27. Peng, X., J. Dai. Approaches to Pythagorean Fuzzy Stochastic Multi-Criteria Decision Making Based on Prospect Theory and Regret Theory with New Distance Measure and Score Function. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 32, 2017, Issue 11, pp. 1187-1214.10.1002/int.21896
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. 28. Peng, X., H. Yuan, Y. Yang. Pythagorean Fuzzy Information Measures and Their Applications. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 32, 2017, Issue 10, pp. 1-39.10.1002/int.21880
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. 29. Reformat, M. Z., R. R. Yager. Suggesting Recommendations Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets Illustrated Using Netflix Movie Data. – In: Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. Berlin, Springer, 2014, pp. 546-556.10.1007/978-3-319-08795-5_56
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. 30. Singh, S., S. Lalotra, S. Sharma. Dual Concepts in Fuzzy Theory: Entropy and Knowledge Measure. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 34, 2019, Issue 5, pp.1034-1059.10.1002/int.22085
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. 31. Szmidt, E., J. Kacprzyk. Entropy for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. – Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 118, 2001, Issue 3, pp. 467-477.10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00402-3
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. 32. Szmidt, E., J. Kacprzyk. Some Problems with Entropy Measures for the Atanassov Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. – Lecture Notes on Computer Science, Vol. 4578, 2007, pp. 291-297.10.1007/978-3-540-73400-0_36
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. 33. Szmidt, E., J. Kacprzyk, P. Bujnowski. How to Measure the Amount of Knowledge Conveyed by Atanassov’s Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. – Information Sciences, Vol. 257, 2014, 276-285.10.1016/j.ins.2012.12.046
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. 34. Thao, N. X. A New Correlation Coefficient of the Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Its Application. – Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 35, 2018, Issue 2, pp. 1959-1968.10.3233/JIFS-171589
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. 35. Thao, N. X., M. Ali, F. Smarandache. An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Clustering Algorithm Based on a New Correlation Coefficient with Application in Medical Diagnosis. – Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 36, 2019, Issue 1, pp. 189-198.10.3233/JIFS-181084
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. 36. Thao, N. X., F. Smarandache. A New Fuzzy Entropy on Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets. – Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 37, 2019, Issue 1, pp. 1065-1074. DOI:10.3233/JIFS-182540.10.3233/JIFS-182540
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. 37. Wei, G., Y. Wei. Similarity Measures of Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets Based on the Cosine Function and Their Applications. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 33, 2018, Issue 3, pp. 634-652.10.1002/int.21965
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. 38. Wei, C. P., P. Wang, Y. Z. Zhang. Entropy, Similarity Measure of Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications. – Information Sciences, Vol. 181, 2011, Issue 19, pp. 4273-4286.10.1016/j.ins.2011.06.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. 39. Xue, W., Z. Xu, X. Zhang, X. Tian. Pythagorean Fuzzy LINMAP Method Based on the Entropy Theory for Railway Project Investment Decision Making. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 33, 2017, Issue 1, pp. 93-125.10.1002/int.21941
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. 40. Yager, R. R., A. M. Abbasov. Pythagorean Membership Grades, Complex Numbers and Decision Making. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 28, 2013, Issue 5, pp. 436-452.10.1002/int.21584
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. 41. Yager, R. R. Pythagorean Membership Grades in Multi-Criteria Decision Making. – IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 22, 2014, Issue 4, pp. 958-965.10.1109/TFUZZ.2013.2278989
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. 42. Yang, M. S., Z. Hussain. Fuzzy Entropy for Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets with Application to Multi-Criterion Decision-Making. – Complexity, Vol. 2018, article ID 2832839, 14 p. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/283283910.1155/2018/2832839
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. 43. Ye, J. Two Effective Measures of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Entropy. – Computing, Vol. 87, 2010, Issue 1-2, pp. 55-62.10.1007/s00607-009-0075-2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. 44. Ye, J. Cosine Similarity Measures for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Their Applications. – Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 53, 2011, pp. 91-97.10.1016/j.mcm.2010.07.022
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. 45. Zadeh, L. A. Fuzzy Sets. – Information and Control, Vol. 8, 1965, Issue 3, pp. 338-356.10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. 46. Zeng, W. Y., H. X. Li. Relationship between Similarity Measure and Entropy of Interval-Valued Fuzzy Sets. – Fuzzy Sets and Systems, Vol. 157, 2006, Issue 11, pp. 1477-1484.10.1016/j.fss.2005.11.020
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. 47. Zhang, Q. S., S. Y. Jiang, B. G. Jia, S. H. Luo. Some Information Measures for Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. – Information Sciences, Vol. 180, 2010, Issue 24, pp. 5130-5145.10.1016/j.ins.2010.08.038
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. 48. Zhang, Q. S., S. Y. Jiang. A Note on Information Entropy Measures for Vague Sets and Its Applications. – Information Sciences, Vol. 178, 2008, Issue 21, pp. 4184-4191.10.1016/j.ins.2008.07.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. 49. Zhang, X. L., Z. S. Xu. Extension of TOPSIS to Multiple Criteria Decision Making with Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 29, 2014, Issue 12, pp. 1061-1078.10.1002/int.21676
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. 50. Zhang, X. A Novel Approach Based on Similarity Measure for Pythagorean Fuzzy Multiple Criteria Group Decision-Making. – International Journal of Intelligent Systems, Vol. 31, 2016, Issue 6, pp. 593-611.10.1002/int.21796
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cait-2020-0001 | Journal eISSN: 1314-4081 | Journal ISSN: 1311-9702
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 20
Submitted on: Nov 27, 2019
Accepted on: Feb 21, 2020
Published on: Mar 27, 2020
Published by: Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
IFSs,
IFSST,
IFSST-knowledge measure,
MCDM
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Information technology

© 2020 Surender Singh, Sumita Lalotra, Abdul Haseeb Ganie, published by Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Information and Communication Technologies
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 20 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)Next article