
Figure 1.
Meteorological data of the experimental site during the study.

Figure 2.
Field trial on black wheat crop in the field on 60 days after sowing (DAS). (A-B) wheat in primary stage in the experimental field, (C) wheat spikes, (D) kernels of black wheat.
Table 1.
Different treatments used during the present study.
| Treatment no. | Treatments Details |
|---|---|
| T0 | Control (No Fertilizers) |
| T1 | Jaivik Khad (100%) + PSB (2 ml l−1) |
| T2 | Jaivik Khad (100%) + NPK (2 ml l−1) |
| T3 | Jaivik Khad (100%) + POTASH (2 ml l−1) |
| T4 | Jaivik Khad (100%) + PSB (3 ml l−1) |
| T5 | Jaivik Khad (100%) + NPK (3 ml l−1) |
| T6 | Jaivik Khad (100%) + POTASH (3 ml l−1) |
| T7 | Jaivik Khad (100%) + PSB (4 ml l−1) |
| T8 | Jaivik Khad (100%) + NPK (4 ml l−1) |
| T9 | Jaivik Khad (100%) + POTASH (4 ml l−1) |
Table 2.
Physicochemical properties of the field soil samples.
| Physicals elements | Results (Value in range) |
|---|---|
| pH | 7.83 ±0.06 |
| EC [dS m−1] | 0.19 ±0.03 |
| Organic Carbon [%w] | 0.23 ±0.00 |
| Organic Matter [%w] | 0.39 ±0.01 |
| Nitrogen [kg ha−1] | 145.93 ±4.75 |
| Phosphorus (P2O5) [kg ha−1] | 14.84 ±6.21 |
| Potassium (K2O) [kg ha−1] | 55.18 ±8.46 |
| Sulfur [ppm] | 4.51 ±0.98 |
| Zn [ppm] | 0.81 ±0.13 |
| Iron [ppm] | 9.17 ±5.92 |
| Mn [ppm] | 1.13 ±0.11 |
| Cu [ppm] | 0.69 ±0.12 |
Table 3.
Growth and development parameters of black wheat under different treatment conditions after 60 days of sowing (DAS).
| Treatments# | Shoot biomass (g) | Root biomass [g] | Plant length [cm] | Leaf area [cm2] | Chlorophyll | No. of tillers | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shoot | Root | ||||||
| T0 | 6.274 ±0.493 | 1.071 ±0.649 | 72.444 ±4.194 | 12.556 ±1.347 | 41.380 ±8.364 | 45.889 ±2.329 | 3.778 ±0.509 |
| T1 | 9.544 ±2.011 | 1.349 ±0.494 | 77.444 ±2.795 | 13.333 ±0.882 | 47.823 ±3.766 | 47.778 ±8.688 | 4.000 ±0.882 |
| T2 | 10.292 ±1.348 | 1.209 ±0.046 | 81.556 ±4.914 | 13.778 ±1.347 | 49.747 ±2.222 | 52.489 ±5.709 | 4.333 ±0.667 |
| T3 | 11.713 ±2.434 | 1.792 ±0.193 | 78.000 ±5.044 | 13.778 ±1.072 | 53.533 ±2.890 | 49.911 ±4.002 | 5.333 ±0.667 |
| T4 | 10.388 ±4.068 | 1.539 ±0.579 | 77.000 ±6.083 | 14.222 ±0.192 | 54.620 ±9.984 | 52.878 ±2.260 | 4.556 ±0.839 |
| T5 | 9.393 ±1.292 | 1.538 ±0.211 | 75.111 ±2.502 | 14.333 ±0.882 | 52.590 ±4.485 | 53.544 ±1.291 | 4.000 ±0.577 |
| T6 | 9.938 ±1.408 | 1.332 ±0.116 | 76.333 ±3.786 | 13.000 ±0.667 | 55.223 ±10.149 | 52.144 ±3.866 | 4.111 ±0.192 |
| T7 | 9.558 ±0.450 | 1.427 ±0.094 | 73.333 ±2.848 | 14.444 ±1.388 | 50.687 ±3.728 | 48.144 ±1.021 | 3.889 ±0.192 |
| T8 | 9.938 ±1.408 | 1.332 ±0.116 | 76.333 ±3.786 | 13.000 ±0.667 | 55.223 ±10.149 | 52.144 ±3.866 | 4.111 ±0.192 |
| T9 | 9.558 ±0.450 | 1.427 ±0.094 | 73.333 ±2.848 | 14.444 ±1.388 | 50.687 ±3.728 | 48.144 ±1.021 | 3.889 ±0.192 |
# see Table 1

Figure 3.
Total yield of black wheat under different treatment conditions.
Table 4.
Yield parameters of black wheat in response to different treatment conditions after 120 days of sowing (DAS).
| Treatments# | Spike length [cm] | No. of seeds per spike | 100 seeds weight [g] | Total yield per plot [g] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0 | 7.433 ±0.581 | 40.889 ±7.198 | 4.030 ±0.056 | 2290.333 ±341.951 |
| T1 | 8.533 ±0.186 | 51.444 ±2.835 | 4.810 ±0.156 | 2759.000 ±169.608 |
| T2 | 8.467 ±0.578 | 46.667 ±3.844 | 4.320 ±0.139 | 3102.333 ±267.562 |
| T3 | 8.556 ±0.353 | 49.778 ±2.269 | 4.540 ±0.408 | 2779.333 ±179.737 |
| T4 | 8.989 ±0.510 | 51.667 ±6.110 | 4.240 ±0.056 | 2922.333 ±145.225 |
| T5 | 9.356 ±0.521 | 55.444 ±1.262 | 4.773 ±0.246 | 2975.000 ±333.078 |
| T6 | 9.433 ±0.481 | 56.667 ±6.506 | 4.880 ±0.445 | 2697.000 ±158.357 |
| T7 | 8.656 ±1.006 | 51.667 ±7.506 | 4.560 ±0.164 | 3048.667 ±241.504 |
| T8 | 8.833 ±0.549 | 53.333 ±5.925 | 4.340 ±0.295 | 2983.667 ±258.411 |
| T9 | 9.067 ±0.176 | 57.000 ±7.550 | 4.557 ±0.564 | 3132.333 ±303.846 |
# see Table 1

Figure 4.
Crop Growth Rate, Relative Growth Rate and Net Assimilation Rate for black wheat plants subjected to various fertilizer treatments.

Figure 5.
Pearson correlation coefficient to depict the effect between fertilizer dosage and yield.

Figure 6.
Correlations (left) between yield parameters and (right) between growth and yield parameters in wheat. SL: spike length (cm); SPS: no. of seeds per spike; SW: 100 seeds weight (g); TY: total yield per plot (g); Sh W: shoot biomass (g); LA: leaf area (cm2); Chl: chlorophyll