Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Forage growth, yield, and quality responses of two hybrids of Napier and sorghum at three cutting intervals in the southern province of Sri Lanka Cover

Forage growth, yield, and quality responses of two hybrids of Napier and sorghum at three cutting intervals in the southern province of Sri Lanka

Open Access
|Sep 2022

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

Total rainfall during 2017 and 2018. Data extracted from the records of the meteorological station, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Mapalana, Kamburupitiya, Sri Lanka.Abbildung 1. Gesamtniederschlag in den Jahren 2017 und 2018 aus den Aufzeichnungen der Wetterstation, Abteilung für Agrartechnik, Mapalana, Kamburupitiya, Sri Lanka.
Total rainfall during 2017 and 2018. Data extracted from the records of the meteorological station, Department of Agricultural Engineering, Mapalana, Kamburupitiya, Sri Lanka.Abbildung 1. Gesamtniederschlag in den Jahren 2017 und 2018 aus den Aufzeichnungen der Wetterstation, Abteilung für Agrartechnik, Mapalana, Kamburupitiya, Sri Lanka.

Figure 2

Effect of variety and cutting interval on ADM yield, CP content, and ACP yield of three varieties during the first (2017–2018) and the second (2018–2019) harvesting years, respectively. abcdefg Interactions means with different superscripts in bars are significantly different at (p > 0.05). ACP: annual crude protein, ADM: annual dry matter, CP: crude protein.Abbildung 2. Auswirkung von Sorte und Schnittintervall auf den jährlichen Ertrag an Trockenmasse (ADM), den Gehalt an Rohprotein (CP) und den jährlichen Ertrag an Rohprotein (ACP) von drei Sorten während des 1. (2017–2018) bzw. 2. (2018–2019) Erntejahres. Interakton mittel mit unterschiedlichen hochstellungen in takten unterscheiden sich signifikant bei (p > 0.05).
Effect of variety and cutting interval on ADM yield, CP content, and ACP yield of three varieties during the first (2017–2018) and the second (2018–2019) harvesting years, respectively. abcdefg Interactions means with different superscripts in bars are significantly different at (p > 0.05). ACP: annual crude protein, ADM: annual dry matter, CP: crude protein.Abbildung 2. Auswirkung von Sorte und Schnittintervall auf den jährlichen Ertrag an Trockenmasse (ADM), den Gehalt an Rohprotein (CP) und den jährlichen Ertrag an Rohprotein (ACP) von drei Sorten während des 1. (2017–2018) bzw. 2. (2018–2019) Erntejahres. Interakton mittel mit unterschiedlichen hochstellungen in takten unterscheiden sich signifikant bei (p > 0.05).

Interaction effects of variety and cutting interval on annual dry matter yield, dry matter content, crude protein, annual crude protein yield, and crude fiber contents during the second harvesting year (2018–2019) Means ± standard error followed by different letters within columns show statistically significant differences (p < 0_05)_ V: variety, H: harvesting interval_Tabelle 7_ Interaktionseffekte von Sorte und Schnittintervall auf den jährlichen Trockenmasseertrag, den Trockenmassegehalt, das Rohprotein, den jährlichen Rohproteinertrag und den Rohfasergehalt im zweiten Erntejahr (2018–2019)_ Mittelwerte ± Standardfehler, gefolgt von unterschiedlichen Buchstaben in den Spalten, unterscheiden sich statistisch signifikant (p < 0,05)_ V: Sorte, H: Ernteintervall_

VarietyCutting interval p-Value
4 weeks6 weeks8 weeks
Dry matter (%)CO-311.67 ± 0.41cd13.01 ± 0.04cd15.21 ± 0.92abcV0.000
CO-412.86 ± 0.36cd13.84 ± 0.71bcd16.53 ± 2.03abH0.059
Sugar graze12.95 ± 0.09d15.24 ± 0.35abc18.88 ± 0.07aV × H0.085

Annual dry matter yield (t/ha)CO-313.63 ± 0.35e34.24 ± 0.65c40.87 ± 1.56bV0.000
CO-413.04 ± 0.72e26.92 ± 0.74d38.96 ± 1.75bH0.000
Sugar graze3.24 ± 0.32f27.85 ± 0.82d44.35 ± 1.32aV × H0.000

Crude protein (%)CO-320.37 ± 0.45b14.15 ± 0.18e13.43 ± 0.11eV0.000
CO-420.25 ± 0.21b13.57 ± 0.23f12.78 ± 0.05gH0.000
Sugar graze21.55 ± 0.32a19.23 ± 0.05c14.68 ± 0.14dV × H0.000

Annual crude protein yield (t/ha)CO-32.77 ± 0.34de4.84 ± 0.23c5.48 ± 0.13bV0.000
CO-42.64 ± 0.11e3.65 ± 0.12d4.98 ± 0.32bH0.000
Sugar graze0.69 ± 0.18f5.35 ± 0.15b6.51 ± 0.15aV × H0.000

Crude fiber (%)CO-326.75 ± 0.23d28.65 ± 0.35c29.55 ± 0.19bV0.000
CO-426.75 ± 0.25d29.10 ± 0.19c31.25 ± 0.1aH0.000
Sugar graze22.58 ± 0.05e26.26 ± 0.14d28.86 ± 0.15cV × H0.000

Harvest dates for cutting treatments in 2017 and 2018_Tabelle 1_ Erntedaten für Schnittbehandlungen in den Jahren 2017 und 2018_

Cutting intervalHarvest datesNumber of cuts
4 weeks2017: June 14, July 12, Aug 9, Sep 6, Oct 4, Nov 1, Nov 29, Dec 2713
2018: Jan 24, Feb 21, Mar 21, Apr 18, May 16
6 weeks2017: Jun 25, July 6, Sep 17, Oct 29, Dec 109
2018: Jan 21, Mar 4, Apr 15, May 27
8 weeks2017: Jul 9, Sep 3, Oct 29, Dec 24,6
2018: Feb 4, Apr 29

Effects of variety and cutting interval on annual dry matter yield, dry matter content, crude protein, annual crude protein yield, and crude fiber contents during the second harvesting year (2018–2019)_ Means ± standard error followed by different letters within columns shows statistically significant differences (p < 0_05)_Tabelle 5_ Auswirkungen von Sorte und Schnittintervall auf die jährliche Trockenmasseausbeute, den Trockenmassegehalt, das Rohprotein, die jährliche Rohproteinausbeute und den Rohfasergehalt von drei Futtermitteln während des zweiten Erntejahres (2018–2019)_ Mittelwerte ± Standardfehler, gefolgt von unterschiedlichen Buchstaben in den Spalten, unterscheiden sich statistisch signifikant (p < 0_05)_

TreatmentDry matter (%)Annual dry matter yield (t/ha)Crude protein (%)Annual crude protein yield (t/ha)Crude fiber (%)
Variety
CO-313.29 ±1.03b29.58 ± 8.20a15.98 ± 2.20b4.14 ± 0.81a28.32 ± 0.82b
CO-414.41 ± 1.10ab26.31 ± 7.49b15.53 ± 2.37b3.70 ± 0.79a29.03 ± 1.29a
Sugar graze15.69 ± 1.73a25.96 ± 11.20b18.49 ± 2.02a4.22 ± 0.17a25.89 ± 1.70c
Harvesting interval
4 weeks12.49 ± 0.41c10.78 ± 2.56c20.72 ± 0.82a1.89 ± 0.56c25.36 ± 1.39c
6 weeks14.03 ± 0.65b29.67 ± 2.30b15.65 ± 1.80b4.56 ± 0.51b28.19 ± 0.69b
8 weeks16.87 ± 1.07a39.39 ± 1.58a13.63 ± 0.56c5.61 ± 0.41a29.69 ± 0.86a

Effects of variety and cutting interval on plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of tillers, number of leaves, and stem diameter of three forages at the first harvesting year_ Means ± standard error followed by different letters within columns show statistically significant differences (p < 0_05)_Tabelle 2_ Auswirkungen von Sorte und Schnittintervall auf Pflanzenhöhe, Blattlänge, Blattbreite, Anzahl der Ackerbauern, Anzahl der Blätter und Stammdurchmesser von drei Futtermitteln_ Mittelwerte ± Standardfehler, gefolgt von unterschiedlichen Buchstaben in den Spalten, unterscheiden sich statistisch signifikant (p < 0,05)_

TreatmentPlant height (cm)Leaf length (cm)Leaf width (cm)No. of tillersNo. of leavesStem diameter (mm)
Variety
CO-3163.0 ± 19.6b94.4 ± 6.1a3.6 ± 0.3c33.5 ± 0.4a254.8 ± 13.1a15.2 ± 1.7a
CO-4164.7 ± 28.3ab91.0 ± 6.4b3.9 ± 0.3b35.1 ± 0.6a266.8 ± 15.8a13.9 ± 1.0b
Sugar graze169.0 ± 25.9a66.6 ± 10.2c7.2 ± 1.3a0.0b8.5 ± 0.7b12.9 ± 0.9c
Harvesting interval
4 weeks118.3 ± 4.8c69.3 ± 11.5c3.6 ± 0.5c22.2± 0.4157.8 ± 75.4b11.6 ± 0.3b
6 weeks177.8 ± 3.0b88.3 ± 7.3b5.3 ± 1.3b23.2 ± 0.5188.8 ± 90.0a15.0 ± 0.9a
8 weeks200.6 ± 5.5a94.4 ± 7.4a5.7 ± 1.6a23.1 ± 1.1183.5 ± 88.2ab15.0 ± 0.9a

Interaction effects of variety and cutting interval on plant height, leaf length, leaf width, number of tillers, number of leaves, and stem diameter of three forages at the first harvesting year_ Means ± standard error followed by different letters within columns differ statistically significant (p < 0_05)_ V: Variety, H: Harvesting interval_Tabelle 3_ Interaktionseffekte von Sorte und Schnittintervall auf Pflanzenhöhe, Blattlänge, Blattbreite, Anzahl der Bestocker, Anzahl der Blätter und Stängeldurchmesser von drei Futtermitteln im ersten Erntejahr_ Mittelwerte ± Standardfehler, gefolgt von unterschiedlichen Buchstaben in den Spalten, unterscheiden sich statistisch signifikant (p < 0,05)_ V: Sorte, H: Ernteintervall_

VarietyHarvesting intervalp-Value
4 weeks6 weeks8 weeks
Plant heightCO-3125.0 ± 6.1e173.4 ± 4.2d190.6 ± 0.5bcV0.038
CO-4109.0 ± 7.2f183.6 ± 3.8cd201.6 ± 2.1abH0.000
Sugar graze120.9 ± 3.2e176.5 ± 9.3cd209.6 ± 4.3aV × H0.000

Leaf lengthCO-382.7 ± 1.6c96.8 ± 1.5ab103.6 ± 3.7aV0.000
CO-478.7 ± 1.0cd94.5 ± 1.5b99.9 ± 1.2abH0.000
Sugar graze46.4 ± 1.5e73.7 ± 0.4d79.7 ± 1.5cdV × H0.000

Leaf widthCO-33.0 ± 1.8e3.8 ± 0.0d4.0 ± 0.1dV0.000
CO-43.2 ± 0.2e4.1 ± 0.0d4.3 ± 0.0cdH0.000
Sugar graze4.6 ± 0.6c8.0 ± 0.4b8.9 ± 0.0aV × H0.000

No. of tillersCO-332.8 ± 6.1a34.2 ± 7.1a33.4 ± 7.4aV0.000
CO-433.8 ± 7.9a35.5 ± 7.1a36.0 ± 6.6aH0.672
Sugar graze0.0b0.0b0.0bV × H0.969

No. of leavesCO-3229.4 ± 55.3b272.9 ± 56.6ab262.2 ±50.7abV0.000
CO-4237.0 ± 42.7ab284.4 ± 57.2a284.4 ± 57.2aH0.002
Sugar graze7.1 ± 0.8c9.0 ± 0.5c9.3 ± 0.5cV × H0.240

Stem diameterCO-311.7 ± 0.5d16.5 ± 0.9a17.2 ± 0.9aV0.000
CO-412.0 ± 0.7cd15.0 ± 1.2ab14.8 ± 1.1abH0.000
Sugar graze11.0 ± 0.3d13.5 ± 1.2bc14.1 ± 1.3bcV × H0.009

Interaction effects of variety and cutting interval on annual dry matter yield, dry matter content, crude protein, annual crude protein yield, and crude fiber contents during the first harvesting year (2017–2018)_ Means ± standard error followed by different letters within columns shows statistically significant differences (p < 0_05)_ V: Variety, H: Harvesting interval_Tabelle 6_ Interaktionseffekte von Sorte und Schnittintervall auf den jährlichen Trockenmasseertrag, den Trockenmassegehalt, das Rohprotein, den jährlichen Rohproteinertrag und den Rohfasergehalt im ersten Erntejahr (2017–2018)_ Mittelwerte ± Standardfehler, gefolgt von unterschiedlichen Buchstaben in den Spalten, unterscheiden sich statistisch signifikant (p < 0,05)_ V: Sorte, H: Ernteintervall_

VarietyCutting interval p-Value
4 weeks6 weeks8 weeks
Dry matter (%)CO-311.67 ± 0.41cd13.01 ± 0.04cd15.21 ± 0.92abcV0.000
CO-412.86 ± 0.36cd13.84 ± 0.71bcd16.53 ± 2.03abH0.059
Sugar graze12.95 ± 0.09d15.24 ± 0.35abc18.88 ± 0.07aV × H0.085

Annual dry matter yield (t/ha)CO-313.63 ± 0.35e34.24 ± 0.65c40.87 ± 1.56bV0.000
CO-413.04 ± 0.72e26.92 ± 0.74d38.96 ± 1.75bH0.000
Sugar graze3.24 ± 0.32f27.85 ± 0.82d44.35 ± 1.32aV × H0.000

Crude protein (%)CO-320.37 ± 0.45b14.15 ± 0.18e13.43 ± 0.11eV0.000
CO-420.25 ± 0.21b13.57 ± 0.23f12.78 ± 0.05gH0.000
Sugar graze21.55 ± 0.32a19.23 ± 0.05c14.68 ± 0.14dV × H0.000

Annual crude protein yield (t/ha)CO-32.77 ± 0.34de4.84 ± 0.23c5.48 ± 0.13bV0.000
CO-42.64 ± 0.11e3.65 ± 0.12d4.98 ± 0.32bH0.000
Sugar graze0.69 ± 0.18f5.35 ± 0.15b6.51 ± 0.15aV × H0.000

Crude fiber (%)CO-326.75 ± 0.23d28.65 ± 0.35c29.55 ± 0.19bV0.000
CO-426.75 ± 0.25d29.10 ± 0.19c31.25 ± 0.1aH0.000
Sugar graze22.58 ± 0.05e26.26 ± 0.14d28.86 ± 0.15cV × H0.000

Effects of variety and cutting interval on annual dry matter yield, dry matter content, crude protein, annual crude protein yield, and crude fiber contents during the first harvesting year (2017–2018)_ Means ± standard error followed by different letters within columns differ statistically significant (p < 0_05)_Tabelle 4_ Auswirkungen der Sorte und des Schnittintervalls auf die jährliche Trockenmasseausbeute, den Trockenmassegehalt, das Rohprotein, die jährliche Rohproteinausbeute und den Rohfasergehalt von drei Futtermitteln (2017–2018) Mittelwerte ± Standardfehler, gefolgt von unterschiedlichen Buchstaben in den Spalten, unterscheiden sich statistisch signifikant (p < 0,05)_

TreatmentDry matter (%)Annual dry matter yield (t/ha)Crude protein (%)Annual crude protein yield (t/ha)Crude fiber (%)
Variety
CO-314.25 ± 0.91b29.30 ± 8.08a15.89 ± 2.16b4.31 ± 0.79a28.88 ± 0.84b
CO-415.15 ± 1.39ab26.02 ± 7.21b15.96 ± 2.09b3.87 ± 0.71a29.45 ± 1.19a
Sugar graze15.73 ± 2.09a24.68 ± 11.61b18.22 ± 1.73a4.10 ± 0.13a25.87 ± 2.02c
Harvesting interval
4 weeks12.66 ± 0.30c10.04 ± 3.40c20.35 ± 0.22a2.02.82 ± 0.68c25.62 ± 1.79c
6 weeks14.78 ± 0.61b29.32 ± 2.22b15.86 ± 1.54b4.62.26 ± 0.41b28.36 ± 0.82b
8 weeks17.69 ± 0.96a40.63 ± 1.42a13.86 ± 0.54c5.64.47 ± 0.39a30.22 ± 0.80a
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/boku-2022-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2719-5430 | Journal ISSN: 0006-5471
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 11
Submitted on: Oct 21, 2021
Accepted on: Dec 10, 2021
Published on: Sep 28, 2022
Published by: Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Hansini Harindrika Jothirathna, Thakshala Seresinhe, Ariyathilaka Manawadu, Piyathilak Weerasinghe, Kumara Mahipala, published by Universität für Bodenkultur Wien
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.