References
- Ayer, N. W., Tyedmers, P. H., Pelletier, N. L., Sonesson, U. and A. Scholz (2007): Co-product allocation in life cycle assessments of seafood production systems: Review of problems and strategies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 12, 480–487.
- BMWFW (2018): Verordnung der Bundesministerin für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Wirtschaft über die Festsetzung der Einspeisetarife für die Abnahme elektrischer Energie aus Ökostromanlagen für die Jahre 2018 und 2019 (Ökostrom-Einspeisetarifverordnung 2018 – ÖSET-VO 2018). StF: BGBl. II Nr. 408/2017.
- Cellulose Lab (2019): 2019 Cellulose Lab Nanocellulose Products Price. https://www.celluloselab.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/CelluloseLab_Product_Price_List_2019.htm. Accessed on 05.07.2021.
- Cherubini, E., Franco, D., Zanghelini, G. M. and S. R. Soares (2018): Uncertainty in LCA case study due to allocation approaches and life cycle impact assessment methods. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 23, 2055–2070.
- Dalgaard, R., Schmidt, J. and A. Flysjö (2014): Generic model for calculating carbon footprint of milk using four different life cycle assessment modelling approaches. Journal of Cleaner Production 73, 146–153.
- Ekvall, T. and G. Finnveden (2001): Allocation in ISO 14041 – a critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production 9, 197–208.
- Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe e.V. (2016): Faustzahlen. https://biogas.fnr.de/daten-und-fakten/faustzahlen. Accessed on 28.06.2021.
- Flysjö, A., Cederberg, C., Henriksson, M. and S. Ledgard (2011): How does co-product handling affect the carbon footprint of milk? Case study of milk production in New Zealand and Sweden. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 16, 420–430.
- Frischknecht, R. (2020): Sachbilanz. In: Lehrbuch der Ökobilanzierung. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 43–100.
- Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M., De Schryver, A., Struijs, J. and R. Van Zelm (2013): ReCiPe 2008: A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. RVIM. https://www.rivm.nl/documenten/a-lcia-method-which-comprises-harmonised-category-indicators-at-midpoint-and-endpoint. Accessed on 21.01.2020.
- Grahl, B. and W. Klöpffer (2009): Sachbilanz. In: Ökobilanz (LCA) – Ein Leitfaden für Ausbildung und Beruf. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA Weinheim, Germany, pp. 63–194.
- Green Delta GmbH (2020): openLCA (Version 1.10.3). www.openlca.org.
- Huijbregts, M., Steinmann, Z., Elshout, P., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M., Hollander, A. and R. Van Zelm (2017): ReCiPe2016: A harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level. Bilthoven, The Netherlands. https://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/Report_ReCiPe_2017.pdf. Accessed on 21.01.2020.
- ISO (2006a): Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework, EN ISO 14040:2006. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
- ISO (2006b): Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines, EN ISO 14044:2006. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
- Jolliet, O., Saade-Sbeih, M., Shaked, S., Jolliet, A. and P. Crettaz (2016): Inventory Analysis of Emissions and Extractions. In: Environmental Life Cycle Assessment. CRC Press Boca Raton, pp. 47–104.
- Krexner, T. (2020): Life cycle assessment of biogas and nano-cellulose production from elephant manure. Master thesis, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna.
- Krexner, T., Bauer, A., Zollitsch, W., Weiland, K., Bismarck, A., Mautner, A., Medel-Jiménez, F., Gronauer, A. and I. Kral (2022): Environmental life cycle assessment of nano-cellulose and biogas production from elephant manure. Journal of Environmental Management 34, 115093.
- Nanografi Nano Technology (2021): Cellulose Nanofiber (Cellulose Nanofibril, Nanofibrillated Cellulose, CNFs). https://nanografi.com/popular-products/cellulose-nanofiber-cellulose-nanofibril-nanofibrillated-cellulose-cnfs/. Accessed on 05.07.2021.
- Thomassen, M. A., Dalgaard, R., Heijungs, R. and I. De Boer (2008): Attributional and consequential LCA of milk production. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13, 339–349.
- Wardenaar, T., van Ruijven, T. W. J., Mendoza, A., Vad, K., Heijungs, R. and J. Guinée (2012): Differences between LCA for analysis and LCA for policy: A case study on the consequences of allocation choices in bio-energy policies. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 17, 1059–1067.
- Weidema, B. P. (2014): Has ISO 14040/44 Failed Its Role as a Standard for Life Cycle Assessment?. Journal of Industrial Ecology 18, 324–326.
- Weidema, B. P. and J. H. Schmidt (2010): Avoiding Allocation in Life Cycle Assessment Revisited. Journal of Industrial Ecology 14, 192–195.
- Weiland, K., Wlcek, B., Krexner, T., Kral, I., Kontturi, E., Mautner, A., Bauer, A. and A. Bismarck (2021): Excellence in excrements: Upcycling of herbivore manure into nanocellulose and biogas. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 9, 15506–15513.
- Wernet, G., Bauer, C., Steubing, B., Reinhard, J., Moreno-Ruiz, E. and B. Weidema (2016): Ecoinvent database version 3.6. https://www.ecoinvent.org/.