Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Tort Liability for Omissions in the Context of Corporate Climate Liability Cover

Tort Liability for Omissions in the Context of Corporate Climate Liability

By:   
Open Access
|Aug 2026

References

  1. Centre for Climate Engagement. Tort Law and Climate Change. (February 2024) // https://lawclimateatlas.org/resources/tort-law-and-climate-change-2/
  2. Cullity, Garrett. “Acts, Omissions, Emissions”: 148–164. In: Jeremy Moss (ed.), Climate Change and Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.
  3. Downs, Sarah. “Civil Liability for Climate Change? The Proposed Tort in Smith v Fonterra with Reference to France and the Netherlands.” Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law (2024): 31–44 // https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12532
  4. European Commission. Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence // https://commission.europa.eu/business-economy-euro/doing-business-eu/sustainability-due-diligence-responsible-business/corporate-sustainability-due-diligence_en
  5. European Group on Tort Law. Principles of European Tort Law // http://www.egtl.org/
  6. Expert Group on Global Climate Obligations. Oslo Principles on Global Climate Obligations. (2015) // https://climateprinciplesforenterprises.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/osloprincipleswebpdf.pdf
  7. Faure, Michael G. “Liability for Omissions in Tort Law: Economic Analysis.” Journal of European Tort Law 2, 2 (August 2011): 184–208 // https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl.2011.184
  8. Faure, Michael, and Marjan Peeters. “Liability and Climate Change.” Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science (April 2019) // https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.648
  9. Gowan, Richard. “The European Security Strategy’s Global Objective: Effective Multilateralism”: 42–62. In: Sven Biscop and Jan J. Anderson (eds.), The EU and the European Security Strategy. London and New York: Routledge, 2008.
  10. Gruber, Malte-Christian. “The Anthropocenic Cupola: On Future Models of Climate Change Liability.” Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie [Journal of Legal Sociology] 44, 1 (2024): 67–110 // https://doi.org/10.1515/zfrs-2023-1004
  11. Harel, Alon, and Assaf Jacob. “An Economic Rationale for the Legal Treatment of Omissions in Tort Law: The Principle of Salience.” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 3, 2 (October 2002): 1–39 // https://doi.org/10.2202/1565-3404.1055
  12. Hinteregger, Monika. “Civil Liability and the Challenges of Climate Change: A Functional Analysis.” Journal of European Tort Law 8, 2 (November 2017): 238–259 // https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2017-0010
  13. InfluenceMap. Carbon Majors Dataset. (August 2025) // https://carbonmajors.org
  14. International Institute for Sustainable Development. Historic International Court of Justice Opinion Confirms States’ Climate Obligations. (July 2025) // https://www.iisd.org/articles/deep-dive/icj-advisory-opinion-climate-change
  15. Jansen, Nils. “Damage Caused by Omission”: 103–167. In: Essential Cases on Natural Causation, Digest of European Tort Law, vol. 1. Vienna: Springer, 2007.
  16. Käerdi, Martin, and Tambet Tampuu. “VÕS § 1043, komm. 3.3.2” [Commentary on § 1043 of the Law of Obligations Act, annotation 3.3.2]. In: Paul Varul, Irene Kull, Villu Kove, and Martin Käerdi, Võlaõigusseadus III. Kommenteeritud väljaanne [Law of Obligations Act III. Commented Edition]. Juura, 2009.
  17. Käerdi, Martin, and Tambet Tampuu. “VÕS § 1050, komm. 3.3.” [Commentary on § 1050 of the Law of Obligations Act, annotation 3.3.]. In: Paul Varul, Irene Kull, Villu Kove, and Martin Käerdi, Võlaõigusseadus III. Kommenteeritud väljaanne [Law of Obligations Act III. Commented Edition]. Juura, 2009.
  18. Koziol, Helmut. “Liability for Omissions — Basic Questions.” Journal of European Tort Law 2, 2 (August 2011): 127–134 // https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl.2011.127
  19. Lahe, Janno. “German Transplants in Estonian Tort Law: General Duties to Maintain Safety.” Juridica International 30 (October 2021): 132–139 // https://doi.org/10.12697/JI.2021.30.15
  20. Latham, Mark, Victor E. Schwartz, and Christopher E. Appel. “The Intersection of Tort and Environmental Law: Where the Twains Should Meet and Depart.” Fordham Law Review 80, 2 (November 2011): 737–773.
  21. Menon, Ravi, and Chiara Zilioli. “Climate-Related Litigation: Recent Trends and Developments.” Network for Greening the Financial System, Technical Document (January 2025) // https://www.ngfs.net/en/publications-and-statistics/publications/report-climate-related-litigationrecent-trends-and-developments
  22. Nõmm, Iko. Kaibekohustuse rikkumisel põhinev deliktioiguslik vastutus [Tort Liability Based on the Breach of a Duty of Care]. Doctoral thesis, supervised by Janno Lahe. Tartu University Press, 2013.
  23. Otto, Friederike E. L., Petra Minnerop, Emmanuel Raju, Luke J. Harrington, Rupert F. Stuart-Smith, Emily Boyd, Rachel James, Richard Jones and Kristian C. Lauta. “Causality and the Fate of Climate Litigation: The Role of the Social Superstructure Narrative.” Global Policy 15 (2024): 736–750 // https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.13113
  24. Quill, Eoin. “Affirmative Duties of Care in the Common Law.” Journal of European Tort Law 2, 2 (August 2011): 151–183 // https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl.2011.151
  25. Schulev-Steindl, Eva, Oliver C. Ruppel, Monika Hinteregger, Gottfried Kirchengast, Lukas H. Meyer, Gerhard Schnedl and Karl W. Steininger (eds.). Climate Change, Responsibility and Liability. Nomos, 2022.
  26. Semmelmayer, Philipp. “Climate Change and the German Law of Torts.” German Law Journal 22, 8 (December 2021): 1569–1582 // https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.76
  27. Setzer, Joana, and Catherine Higham. Global Trends in Climate Change Litigation: 2024 Snapshot. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and Political Science (June 2024) // https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/Global-trends-in-climate-change-litigation-2024-snapshot.pdf
  28. Spitzer, Martin, and Bernhard Burtscher. “Liability for Climate Change: Cases, Challenges and Concepts.” Journal of European Tort Law 8, 2 (November 2017): 137–176 // https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2017-0009
  29. Steel, Sandy. “Rationalising Omissions Liability in Negligence.” Law Quarterly Review 135 (June 2019): 484–507.
  30. Tampuu, Tambet. Lepinguvälised võlasuhted [Non-Contractual Obligations]. 2nd ed. Juura, 2017.
  31. United Nations Global Compact. About us. (August 2025) // https://unglobalcom-pact.org/about
  32. UNDP. Civil Service Training in the Context of Public Administration Reform. A Comparative Study of Selected Countries from Central and Eastern Europe, and the former Soviet Union (1989 to 2003). (May 2003) // http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UNTC/UNPAN017191.pdf
  33. von Bar, Christian. Non-Contractual Liability Arising out of Damage Caused to Another. Principles of European Law: Study Group on a European Civil Code. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  34. von Bar, Christian, Walter van Gerven, Pierre Larouche, Jack Lever and Geneviève Viney. Tort Law: Scope of Protection. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1998.
  35. Wagner, Gerhard. “BGB § 823 Liability for Damages.” In Münchener Kommentar zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuch [Munich Commentary on the German Civil Code]. 9th ed. C. H. Beck, 2024.
  36. Wagner, Gerhard, and Arvid Arntz. “Liability for Climate Damage under the German Law of Torts.” SSRN Electronic Journal (January 2021) // https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3792048
  37. Weller, Marc-Philippe, and Sophia Schwemmer. “Klimatransformationspflichten für Großunternehmen — Umsetzung des Art. 22 CSDDD via Klimaquote” [Climate Transformation Obligations for Large Companies — Implementation of Art. 22 CSDDD via Climate Quota]. Die Aktiengesellschaft [The Stock Corporation] 15 (2024): 517–527.
  38. Weller, Marc-Philippe, and Mai-Lan Tran. “Climate Litigation Against Companies.” Climate Action 1, 14 (July 2022) // https://doi.org/10.1007/s44168-022-00013-6
  39. Weller, Marc-Philippe, and Mai-Lan Tran. “Klimawandelklagen im Rechtsvergleich — Private Enforcement als weltweiter Trend?” [Climate Change Litigation in Comparative Law — Private Enforcement as a Global Trend?]. Zeitschrift für europäisches Privatrecht [Journal of European Private Law] 3 (August 2021): 574–605.
  40. Widmer, Pierre. “Ex nihilo responsabilitas fit, or the Miracles of Legal Metaphysics.” Journal of European Tort Law 2, 2 (August 2011): 135–150 // https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl.2011.135
  41. Widmer, Pierre. “Principles of European Tort Law: Text and Commentary”: 86–90. In: European Group on Tort Law. Principles of European Tort Law: Text and Commentary. Vienna: Springer, 2005.
  42. Zahar, Alexander. “Human Rights Law and the Obligation to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions.” Human Rights Review 23, 3 (September 2022): 385–411 // https://doi.org/10.1007/s12142-021-00648-8
  43. LEGAL REFERENCES
  44. Directive (EU) 2024/1760 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 on corporate sustainability due diligence and amending Directive (EU) 2019/1937 and Regulation (EU) 2023/2859. OJ L, 2024/1760, 5 July 2024.
  45. International Court of Justice. Obligations of States in Respect of Climate Change, Advisory Opinion, 23 July 2025 // https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/187/187-20250723-adv-01-00-en.pdf
  46. Judgment of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 2-19-7379, 26 October 2021.
  47. Judgment of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 2-14-6942, 21 April 2021.
  48. Judgment of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 2-14-50307, 12 June 2019.
  49. Judgment of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 3-2-1-127-16, 15 December 2016.
  50. Judgment of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 3-2-1-129-13, 11 December 2013.
  51. Judgment of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 3-2-1-173-12, 8 January 2013.
  52. Judgment of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 3-2-1-69-15, 17 June 2015.
  53. Judgment of the Civil Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 3-2-1-79-05, 22 September 2005.
  54. Judgment of the Civil Chamber of the Tartu Court of Appeal in case No. 2-11-41431, 22 October 2012.
  55. Saúl Ananías Luciano Lliuya v. RWE AG. Oberlandesgericht Hamm, 28 May 2025, I-5 U 15/17 // https://rwe.climatecase.org/sites/default/files/2025-05/Urteil%20v.%2028.5.2025-anon.pdf
  56. Vereniging Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell PLC. The Hague District Court (2021, ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2021:5339).
  57. Vereniging Milieudefensie et al. v. Royal Dutch Shell PLC. The Hague Court of Appeal (2024, ECLI:NL:GHDHA:2024:2100).
  58. Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v. Switzerland [GC]. No. 53600/20, Eur. Ct. H.R., 9 April 2024.
  59. Võlaõigusseadus (Law of Obligations Act), RT I 2001, 81, 487; RT I, 11.11.2025, 16. Riigi Teataja (State Gazette) [in Estonian; unofficial English translation available at: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/507032019001/consolide/current].
Language: English
Page range: 154 - 173
Submitted on: Mar 11, 2026
Accepted on: Aug 5, 2026
Published on: Aug 27, 2026
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2026 Britte Koppel, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.