Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Arbitration Agreements and Protection of the Right to a Fair Trial Cover

Arbitration Agreements and Protection of the Right to a Fair Trial

Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. 1. Bermann, George A. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards the Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention by National Courts. Springer, 2017.10.1007/978-3-319-50915-0
  2. 2. Besson, Sebastien. “Arbitration and Human Rights.” ASA Bull. 24 (2006): 395–406.10.54648/ASAB2006051
  3. 3. Bordas, Albert. Des judgements susceptible d’appel. Paris, 1904.
  4. 4. Born, Gary. International Commercial Arbitration. Volume 1. Wolters Kluwer, 2009.
  5. 5. Chainais, Cécile. “Exigences du procès équitable et arbitrage existence et essence du droit à un procès arbitral equitable”: 265–322. In: L. Milano, ed. Convention européenne des droits de l’homme et droit de l’entreprise. Nemesis/Anthemis, 2016.
  6. 6. Derains, Yves, and Laurence Kiffer. “National Report for France (2013 through 2018)”. In: Lise Bosman, ed. ICCA International Handbook on Commercial Arbitratio. 2018.
  7. 7. Dickson, Moses Oruaze. “Party autonomy and justice in international commercial arbitration.” International Journal of Law and Management 60(1) (2018): 114–134.10.1108/IJLMA-12-2016-0184
  8. 8. Fry, Jason, Simon Greenberg, and Francesca Mazza. The Secretariat’s Guide to ICC Arbitration. Paris: ICC Publishing SA, 2012.
  9. 9. Hodges, Paula. “The relevance of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights in the context of arbitration proceedings.” International Arbitration Law Review 10(5) (2007): 163–169.
  10. 10. Jokubauskas, Remigijus, Mykolas Kirkutis, Egidija Tamošiūnienė, and Vigintas Višinskis. Ginčų nagrinėjimas komerciniame arbitraže. Vilnius: MRU, 2020.
  11. 11. Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle, and Antonio Rigozzi. International Arbitration Law and Practice in Switzerland. Oxford University Press, 2015.
  12. 12. Kunz, Catherine A. “Waiver of right to challenge an international arbitral award is not incompatible with ECHR: Tabbane v. Switzerland.” European International Arbitration Review (2016): 125–132.
  13. 13. Lau, Christopher, and Christin Horlach. “Party Autonomy – The Turning Point?” International dispute resolution Vol. 4, No. 1 (2010): 121–130.
  14. 14. Mavunduse, Davis, and Camilla Andersen. “Party autonomy in international commercial arbitration: a look at freedom, delimitation and judicialization.” International Trade Law & Regulation 25(2) (2019): 92–106.
  15. 15. Menaker, Andrea. International Arbitration and the Rule of Law–Contribution and Conformity, ICCA Congres Series No. 19. Wolters Kluwer, 2017.
  16. 16. Petkutė-Gurienė, Jurgita. “Komercinis arbitražas ir teisingo bylos nagrinėjimo garantijos pagal Europos žmogaus teisių konvencijos 6(1) straipsnį.” Jurisprudence 24 (2) (2017): 465–489.
  17. 17. Schabas, William A. The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2015.
Language: English
Page range: 159 - 180
Submitted on: Nov 23, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 30, 2020
Published on: Mar 18, 2021
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Dalia Višinskytė, Remigijus Jokubauskas, Mykolas Kirkutis, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.