Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Party Autonomy in the Context of Jurisdictional and Choice of Law Rules of Matrimonial Property Regulation Cover

Party Autonomy in the Context of Jurisdictional and Choice of Law Rules of Matrimonial Property Regulation

Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. 1. Ballesteros, Mớnica Herranz. “The Regime of Party Autonomy in the Brussels I Recast: The Solutions Adopted for Agreements on Jurisdiction.” Journal of Private International Law 10 (2014): 291-308.10.5235/17441048.10.2.291
  2. 2. Cazorla Gonzáles, Maria Jose, Manuela Giobbi, Jerca Kramberger Škerl, Lucia Ruggeri, and Sandra Winkler, eds. Property relations of cross border couples in the European Union. Napoli: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 2020.
  3. 3. Damascelli, Domenico. “Applicable law, jurisdiction, and recognition of decisions in matters relating to property regimes of spouses and partners in European and Italian private international law.” Trusts & Trustees Vol. 25, No. 1 (2018): 6–16.10.1093/tandt/tty158
  4. 4. De Boer, Theodorus Martinus. “Party autonomy and its limitations in the Rome II regulation.” Yearbook of Private International Law 9 (2007): 19-29.10.1515/9783866537200.1.19
  5. 5. Dolžan, Judita. “Uredbi (EU) glede premoženjskopravnih razmerij za mednarodne pare – kolizijska pravila”. Odvetnik 2 (2019): 106–113.
  6. 6. Franzina, Pietro. “Article 7 Choice of court”: 85–92. In: Ilaria Viarengo and Pietro Franzina. The EU Regulations on the Property Regimes of International Couples. A Commentary. Cheltenham: Elgar, 2020.
  7. 7. Grieco, Cristina. “The role of party autonomy under the Regulations on matrimonial property regimes and property consequences of registered partnerships. Some remarks on the coordination between the legal regime established by the new regulations and other relevant instruments of European private international law.” Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional Vol. 10, No. 2, (2018): 457–476 // DOI: 10.20318/cdt.2018.4384.10.20318/cdt.2018.4384
  8. 8. Koumpli, Vassiliki, and Vassiliki Marazopoulou. “Greece”: 287–310. In: Lucia Ruggeri, Ivana Kunda, and Sandra Winkler, eds. Family Property and Succession in EU Member States National Reports on the Collected Data. Rijeka: Sveučilište u Rijeci, Pravni fakultet, 2019.
  9. 9. Kruger, Thalia. “Finding a Habitual Residence”: 74–89. In: Ilaria Viarengo and Francesca C. Villata, eds. Planning the Future of Cross Border Families: A Path Through Coordination. Hart Publishing, 2020.
  10. 10. Kuipers, Jan-Jaap. “Party Autonomy in the Brussels I Regulation and Rome I Regulation and the European Court of Justice.” German Law Journal 10 (2009): 1505-1525.10.1017/S2071832200018356
  11. 11. Limante, Agne, and Ivana Kunda. “Jurisdiction in Parental Responsibility Matters”: 61–91. In: Costanza Honorati, ed. Jurisdiction in Matrimonial Matters, Parental Responsibility and International Abduction. A Handbook on the Application of Brussels IIa Regulation in National Courts. Torino: Peter Lang, 2017.
  12. 12. Limante, Agne. “Establishing Habitual Residence of Adults under the Brussels IIa Regulation: Best Practices from National Case-law.” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 14, No. 1 (2018): 160–181 // https://doi.org/10.1080/17441048.2018.1442128.10.1080/17441048.2018.1442128
  13. 13. Mandery, Maya. Party Autonomy in Contractual and Non-Contractual Obligations. A European and Anglo-Common Law perspective on the freedom of choice of law in the Rome I Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations and the Rome II Regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations. Bern: Peter Lang, 2014.
  14. 14. Maultzsch, Felix. “Party Autonomy in European Private International Law: Uniform Principle or Context-Dependent Instrument?” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 12, No. 3 (2016): 466–491 // DOI: 10.1080/17441048.2016.1257846.10.1080/17441048.2016.1257846
  15. 15. Plevri, Anna. “Cyprus”: 93–122. In: Lucia Ruggeri, Ivana Kunda, and Sandra Winkler, eds. Family Property and Succession in EU Member States National Reports on the Collected Data. Rijeka: Sveučilište u Rijeci, Pravni fakultet, 2019.
  16. 16. Pogorelčnik Vogrinc, Neža. “Applicable law in matrimonial property regime disputes.” Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci Vol. 40, No. 3 (2019): 1075–1096 // DOI: 10.30925/zpfsr.40.3.5.10.30925/zpfsr.40.3.5
  17. 17. Poretti, Paula. “Odlučivanje o imovinskim odnosima bračnih drugova u ostavinskim postupcima sukladno Uredbi 2016/1103 o bračnoimovinskom režimu.” Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci Vol. 38, No. 1 (2017): 449–471.10.30925/zpfsr.38.1.16
  18. 18. Rudolf, Claudia. “Premoženjska razmerja med zakonci v mednarodnem zasebnem pravu.” Podjetje in delo 6-7 (2018): 952–963.
  19. 19. Symeonides, Symeon C. Choice of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190496722.001.0001
  20. 20. Symeonides, Symeon C. “Party Autonomy in Rome I and IΙ from a Comparative Perspective”: 513-550. In: Katharina Boele-Woelki, Thalia Einhorn, Daniel Girsberger, and Symeon Symeonides, eds. Convergence and Divergence in Private International Law - Liber Amicorum Kurt Siehr. Eleven International Publishing, 2010.
  21. 21. Valentová, Lucia. “Property Regimes of Spouses and Partners in New EU Regulations – Jurisdiction, Prorogation and Choice of Law.” International and Comparative Law Review Vol. 16, No. 2 (2016): 221–240 // DOI: 10.1515/iclr-2016-0026.10.1515/iclr-2016-0026
  22. 22. Viarengo, Ilaria. “Choice of Law Agreements in Property Regimes, Divorce, and Succession: Stress-testing the New EU Regulations.” ERA Forum 17 (2016): 543–554.10.1007/s12027-017-0452-9
  23. 23. Walker, Lara. “Party Autonomy, Inconsistency and the Specific Characteristics of Family Law in the EU.” Journal of Private International Law Vol. 14, No. 2 (2018): 225–261 // DOI: 10.1080/17441048.2018.1509973.10.1080/17441048.2018.1509973
  24. 24. Wautelet, Patrick R., “Party Autonomy in International Family Relationships: A Research Agenda” (November 2020) // https://ssrn.com/abstract=2589980.
  25. 25. Weller, Marc-Philippe, and Rentsch, Bettina. “‘Habitual Residence’: A Plea for ‘Settled Intention’”: 171–187. In: Stefan Leible, ed. General Principles of European Private International Law. Wolters Kluwer, 2016.
Language: English
Page range: 135 - 158
Submitted on: Nov 23, 2020
Accepted on: Dec 30, 2020
Published on: Mar 18, 2021
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2021 Agnė Limantė, Neža Pogorelčnik Vogrinc, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.