Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Judicial Decision-Making From An Empirical Perspective Cover

Judicial Decision-Making From An Empirical Perspective

Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
Volume 6 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)
By: ,   and    
Open Access
|Sep 2013
References

References

  1. 1. Bedard, Jean, Michelene T. H. Chi, Lynford E. Graham, and James Shanteau. “Expertise in Auditing.”12 (1993): 1-25.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. 2. Carruthers, Peter. “An Architecture for Dual Reasoning”: 109-128. In: Jonathan Evans and Keith Frankish, eds.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. 3. Camerer, Colin F., and Eric J. Johnson. “The Process-Performance Paradox in Expert Judgment: How Can Experts Know So Much and Predict So Badly?”: 195-217. In: K. Anders Ericsson and Jacqui Smith, eds.,. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. 4. Chen, Serena, and Shelly Chaiken. “The Heuristic-Systemic Model in Its Broader Context”: 73-96. In: Shelly Chaiken and Yaacov Trope, eds.. New York: Guilford Press, 1999.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. 5. Colvin, Geoffrey.. New York: Penguin Books, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. 6. Danzigera, Shai, Jonathan Levav, and Liora Avnaim-Pessoa. “Extraneous Factors in Judicial Decisions.”108 (2011): 6889-92.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  7. 7. Desvousges, William H., F. Reed Johnson, Richard W. Dunford, Kevin J. Boyle, Sara P. Hudson, and K. Nicole Wilson. “Measuring Natural Resource Damages with Contingent Valuation: Tests of Validity and Reliability”: 91-159. In: Jerry A. Hausman, ed.. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1993.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. 8. Englich, Birte, Thomas Mussweiler, and Fritz Strack. “Playing Dice with Criminal Sentences: The Influence of Irrelevant Anchors on Experts’ Judicial Decision Making.”32 (2006): 188-200.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  9. 9. Ericsson, K. Anders. “The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance”: 685-706. In: Ericsson, K. Anders, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, and R. R. Hoffman, eds.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. 10. Ericsson, K. Anders. “The Acquisition of Expert Performance: An Introduction to Some of the Issues”: 1-50. In: K. Anders Ericsson, ed.,. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. 11. Ericsson, K. Anders, N. Charness, P. Feltovich, and R. R. Hoffman, eds.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  12. 12. Evans, Jonathan St. B. T. “How Many Dual-Process Theories Do We Need? One, Two, or Many?”: 33-54. In: Jonathan Evans and Keith Frankish, eds.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. 13. Frankish, Keith, and Jonathan St. B. T. Evans. “The Duality of Mind: An Historical Perspective”: 1-32. In: Jonathan Evans and Keith Frankish, eds.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. 14. Frederick, Shane. “Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making.”19 (2005): 25-42.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  15. 15. Gilovich, Thomas.. New York: The Free Press, 1991.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. 16. Guthrie, Chris, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, and Andrew J. Wistrich. “Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases.”93 (2007): 1-44.
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. 17. Guthrie, Chris, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski, and Andrew J. Wistrich. “Inside the Judicial Mind.”86 (2001): 777-830.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  18. 18. Hutcheson, Joseph C. Jr. “The Judgment Intuitive: The Function of the 'Hunch’ in Judicial Decision.”14 (1929): 274-288.
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. 19. Kahneman, Daniel, and Shane Frederick. “Representativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive Judgment”: 49-81. In: Thomas Gilovich, Dale Griffin, and Daniel Kahneman, eds.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. 20. Kahneman, Daniel.. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. 21. Kiser, Randall.. Heidelberg: Springer, 2010.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  22. 22. Krieger, Stefan. “The Development of Legal Reasoning Skills in Law Students: An Empirical Study.”56 (2006): 332-355.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. 23. Lehman, Darrin R., Richard O. Lempert, and Richard E. Nisbett. “The Effects of Graduate Training on Reasoning: Formal Discipline and Thinking about Everyday-life Events.”43 (1988): 431-442. Reprinted in: Richard E. Nisbett, ed.. New Jersey: Routledge, 1993.
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. 24. Leiter, Brian. “Positivism, Formalism, Realism.”99 (1999):1138-1164.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  25. 25. Posner, Richard A.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. 26. Radin, Max. “Legal Realism.”31 (1931): 824-828.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  27. 27. Radin, Max. “The Theory of Judicial Decisions: Or How Judges Think.”11 (1925): 357-362.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. 28. Schauer, Frederick. “Is There a Psychology of Judging?”: 103-120. In: David E. Klein and Gregory Mitchell, eds.(American Psychology-Law Society). New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. 29. Schauer, Frederick.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2009.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  30. 30. Shah, Anuj K., and Daniel M. Oppenheimer. “Heuristics Made Easy: An Effort- Reduction Framework.”134 (2008): 207-222.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  31. 31. Stanovich, Keith E. “Distinguishing the Reflective, Algorithmic, and Autonomous Minds: Is it Time for a Tri-Process Theory?”: 55-88. In: Jonathan Evans and Keith Frankish, eds.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. 32. Strak, Fritz, and Thomas Mussweiler. “Explaining the Enigmatic Anchoring Effect: Mechanisms of Selective Accessibility.”73 (1997): 437-446.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  33. 33. Sullivan, William M., Anne Colby, Judith Welch Wegner, Lloyd Bond, Lee S. Shulman.(Jossey- Bass/Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching). California: Jossey-Bass, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. 34. Tamanaha, Brian Z.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  35. 35. Tetlock, Philip E.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. 36. Tiedens, Larissa Z., and Susan Linton. “Judgment under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty: The Effects of Specific Emotions on Information Processing.”81 (2001): 973-988.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  37. 37. Toplak, Maggie E., Richard F. West, and Keith E. Stanovich. “The Cognitive Reflection Test as a Predictor of Performance on Heuristics-and-Biases Tasks.”39 (2011): 1275-1289.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  38. 38. Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. “Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.”185 (1974): 1124-1130.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  39. 39. Tumonis, Vitalius. “Legal Realism & Judicial Decision-making.”19 (2012): 1361-1382.
    Search in Google Scholar
  40. 40. Vohs, Kathleen D., and Mary Frances Luce. “Judgment and Decision Making”: 733-756. In: Roy F. Baumeister and Eli J. Finkel, eds.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
    Search in Google Scholar
  41. 41. Vohs, Kathleen D., Roy F. Baumeister, Brandon J. Schmeichel, Jean M. Twenge, Noelle M. Nelson, and Dianne M. Tice. “Making Choices Impairs Subsequent Self-control: A Limited Resource Account of Decision Making, Self-regulation, and Active Initiative.”94 (2008): 883-898.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  42. 42. Wilson, Timothy D., and Jonathan W. Schooler. “Thinking Too Much: Introspection Can Reduce the Quality of Preferences and Decisions.”60 (1991): 181-192.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  43. 1. Adam, Barbara, and Joost Loon. “Repositioning Risk; the Challenge for Social Theory”: 1-31. In: Barbara Adam, Ulrich Beck, and Joost Loon, eds.. Sage Publications, 2005.
    Search in Google Scholar
  44. 2// http://klaipeda.diena.lt/naujienos/ekonomika/apklausa-vae-salininku-irpriesininku- yra-beveik-po-lygiai-428441#axzz2AJ7Ld26A (accessed June 12, 2013).
    Search in Google Scholar
  45. 3. Augutis, Juozas, Ričardas Krikštolaitis, Dainius Genys, and Giedrius Česnakas, eds.. Kaunas: Vytautas Magnus University, 2013.
    Search in Google Scholar
  46. 4. Baločkaitė, Rasa, and Leonardas Rinkevičius. “Branduolinės energetikos diskursai Lietuvos žiniasklaidoje ir viešojoje nuomonėje: nuostatų takoskyros ir ‘kalbančiųjų klasės’ formavimasis rizikos visuomenėje” (“Nuclear Power Discourse in Lithuanian Mass Media and Public Opinion: Attitudinal Divergences and the Emerging Talking and Acting Classes in the Risk Society”).Vol. 20, No. 4 (2009): 259-270.
    Search in Google Scholar
  47. 5. Balžekienė, Aistė.. Ph.D. thesis. Kaunas: Kaunas University of Technology, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  48. 6. Beck, Ulrich. “Living in the World Risk Society.”Vol. 35, No. 3 (2006): 329-345.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  49. 7. Bourdieu, Pierre. “Social Space and Symbolic Power.”Vol. 7, No. 1 (1989): 14-25.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  50. 8. Česnakas, Giedrius. “Energy Security Challenges, Concepts and Controversy of Energy Nationalism in Lithuanian Energy Politics.”6:1 (2013) [forthcoming].
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  51. 9. Foucault, Michel.. Vilnius: Baltos lankos, 1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  52. 10. Foucault, Michel.Vilnius: Baltos lankos, 1998.
    Search in Google Scholar
  53. 11. Gaidys, Vladas, and Leonardas Rinkevičius. “Černobylio baimė, pigios energijos nauda ar kai kas daugiau? Dvidešimties metų visuomenės nuomonės apie Ignalinos AE sociologiniai tyrimai Lietuvoje” (“The Scares of Chernobyl, the Favoring of Cheap Energy or Something More? Twenty Years of Sociological Public Opinion Polls in Lithuania on the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant”).Vol. 19, No. 4 (2008): 102-111.
    Search in Google Scholar
  54. 12. Genys, Dainius, and Eigintas Aleksandravičius. “Bendro vardiklio beieškant - Lietuvos energetinio saugumo orientyrai ekspertiniu požiūriu” (“Searching for Common Denominator - The Guidlines of Lithuania’s Energy Security in Expert Point of View”).No. 12 (2012): 63-84.
    Search in Google Scholar
  55. 13. Janeliūnas, Tomas. “Lithuanian Energy Strategy and its Implications on Regional Cooperation”: 190-222. In: Andris Sprūds and Toms Rostoks, eds.
    Search in Google Scholar
  56. Riga: Zinatne, 2009.
    Search in Google Scholar
  57. 14. Lyotard, J. Francois.. Vilnius: Baltos lankos, 1993.
    Search in Google Scholar
  58. Molis, Arūnas.. Vilnius: Centre for Strategic Studies, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  59. 16. Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Lithuania.. Vilnius, 2012.
    Search in Google Scholar
  60. 17. Telešienė, Audronė. “Kritiškosios diskurso analizės metodologinių principų taikymas sociologiniuose tyrimuose” (“Application of the Methodological Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis to Sociological Research”).
    Search in Google Scholar
  61. Vol. 16, No. 2 (2005): 1-6.
    Search in Google Scholar
  62. 18. Van Dijk, Teun A.. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
    Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
  63. 19. Van Dijk, Teun A. “Discourse, Ideology and Context.” Paper for the 7th International Conference of Pragmatics. Budapest (July 2000)XXX/1-2 (2001): 11-40.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjlp-2013-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2029-0454
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 140 - 162
Published on: Sep 5, 2013
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Judicial decision-making,
legal realism,
heuristics & biases,
intuitive decision-making,
expert Judgment
Related subjects:
Law,
Law, other,
Social sciences,
Political science,
Political science, other

© 2013 Vitalius Tumonis, Mykolas Šavelskis, Inga Žalytė, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Volume 6 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)
Previous article
Next article