Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
“Is This Really What I Voted For?” – On The Legitimacy Of European Integration Cover

“Is This Really What I Voted For?” – On The Legitimacy Of European Integration

Open Access
|Sep 2013

References

  1. 1. Anstis, Sebastian C. St. J, and Mark W. Zacher. “The Normative Bases of the Global Territorial Order.”21 (2010): 306-323.
  2. 2. Bieber, Roland. “An Association of Sovereign States.”5 (2009): 391-406.
  3. 3. Craig, Paul, and Gráinne de Búrca.Oxford University Press, 1998.
  4. 4. De Witte, Bruno. “International Law as a Tool for the European Union.”5 (2009): 265-283.
  5. 5. Kerikmäe, Tanel. “Estonia as an EU state: lack of proactive constitutional dialogue”: 11-42. In: Kyriaki Topidi and Alexander H. E. Morawa, eds.Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate Press, 2010.
  6. 6. Locke, Tobias. “Why the European Union is not a State: Some critical remarks.”5 (2009): 407-420.
  7. 7. Majone, Giandomenico.Oxford University Press, 2005.
  8. 8. Nyman-Metcalf, Katrin, and Ioannis Papageorgiou.Intersentia, 2005.
  9. 9. Prechal, Sacha. “Direct Effect, Indirect Effect, Supremacy and the Evolving Constitution of the European Union. - The Fundamentals of EU Law Revisited”: 55-56. In: Catherine Barnard, ed.Oxford University Press, 2007.
  10. 10. Timmermans, Christiaan. “The European Union’s Judicial System.”41 (2004): 393-405.
  11. 11. Verhoeven, Amaryllis.. Kluwer Law International, 2002.
  12. 12. Williams, Andrew T. “Taking values seriously: Toward a Philosophy of EU Law.”29(3) (2009):549-577.
  13. 13. Wessels, Wolfgang “An Ever Closer Fusion? A Dynamic Macropolitical View on Integration Processes.”Vol. 35, No. 2 (1997):267-299.
  14. 14. Weiler, Joseph H. H. “European Neo-constitutionalism: In search of Foundations for the European Constitutional Order.”XLIV (1996): 517-533.
  15. 1European Court of Justice, 1964, Case 6/64.
  16. 2. BVerfG (Federal Constitutional Court of Germany), 2010, no. 1 BvR 256/08 // http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/rs20100302_1bvr025608.html.
  17. 3U.S. Supreme Court, 1856, no. 60 U.S. 393.
  18. 4European Court of Justice, 1979, Case 44/79.
  19. 5v.European Court of Justice, 1970, Case 11/70.
  20. 6. European Court of Justice, 2008, Case C-402/05P.
  21. 7BVerfG (Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, 2009, no. 2 BvE 2/08 // www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208 en.html.
  22. 8European Court of Justice, 1975, Case 4/73.
  23. 9. European Court of Justice, 2004, Case C-36/02.
  24. 10. European Court of Justice, 2003, Case C-112/00.
  25. 11. U.S. Supreme Court, 1872, no. 83 U.S. 16 Wall. 36 36.
  26. 12BVerfGE, 1974, no. 37, 271.
  27. 13. BVerfGE 73, 339, 1986, no. 197/83.
  28. 14. Advocate General in European Court of Justice, 2010, Case C-118/08.
  29. 15. Official Journal of the European Union, 2004, C310/01.
  30. 16. European Court of Justice, 1963, Case 26/62.
Language: English
Page range: 45 - 62
Published on: Sep 5, 2013
Published by: Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2013 Tanel Kerikmäe, Katrin Nyman-Metcalf, Ioannis Papageorgiou, published by Faculty of Political Science and Diplomacy and the Faculty of Law of Vytautas Magnus University (Lithuania)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.