Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Protecting dual-use technological innovation through trade secret law: institutional limits and cybersecurity challenges Cover

Protecting dual-use technological innovation through trade secret law: institutional limits and cybersecurity challenges

TalTech Journal of European Studies
Volume 16 (2026): Issue 2 (December 2026)
By:   
Open Access
|Oct 2026
References

References

  1. Aplin, T. (2013) ‘Reverse engineering and commercial secrets’, Current Legal Problems, 66(1), pp. 341–377. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cut004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Aplin, T., Radauer, A., Bader, M.A. and Searle, N. (2023) ‘The role of EU trade secrets law in the data economy: an empirical analysis’, IIC – International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 54, pp. 826–858. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01325-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bone, R.G. (2011) ‘Trade secrecy, innovation, and the requirement of reasonable secrecy precautions’, in R.C. Dreyfuss and K.J. Strandburg (eds) The law and theory of trade secrecy: a handbook of contemporary research. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 9–40. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857933072.00010
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Civil Code (France) 1804. Code civil. Légifrance, consolidated text. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006070721/ (Accessed: 17 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. ‘CK v. Dun & Bradstreet Austria GmbH’ (2025) Case C-203/22. Judgement of the Court, 27 February. Available at: https://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf?num=C-203/22 (Accessed: 23 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Commercial Code (France) 1807. Code de commerce. Légifrance, consolidated text. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000005634379/2026-01-11 (Accessed: 18 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Competition Act (Estonia) 2001. Konkurentsiseadus (KonkS). RT I, 18 November 2025, 2. Available at: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/118112025002 (Accessed: 30 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Constitution of the Republic of Estonia 1992. Eesti Vabariigi põhiseadus. RT 1992, 26, 349. Available at: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/115052015002 (Accessed: 21 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. ‘Council directive (EU) 2016/943 of 8 June 2016 on the protection of undisclosed know-how and business information (trade secrets) against their unlawful acquisition, use and disclosure’ (2016) Official Journal L 157, pp. 1–18. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/943/oj
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Court of Cassation (France) (2025) Case No. 23-10.953. Judgement, 5 February. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/juri/id/JURITEXT000051151441 (Accessed: 18 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Cundiff, V.A. (2009) ‘Reasonable measures to protect trade secrets in a digital environment’, IDEA – The Intellectual Property Law Review, 49(3), pp. 359–410. Available at: https://ipmall.law.unh.edu/sites/default/files/hosted_resources/IDEA/idea-vol49-no3-cundiff.pdf (Accessed: 18 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Duguin, S. and Pavlova, P. (2023) The role of cyber in the Russian war against Ukraine: its impact and the consequences for the future of armed conflict. European Parliament Think Tank Briefing. 4 September. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EXPO_BRI(2023)702594 (Accessed: 26 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Employment Contracts Act (Estonia) 2008. Töölepingu seadus (TLS). RT I, 23 December 2024, 6. Available at: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/123122024006 (Accessed: 30 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. EUIPO (2023) Trade secrets litigation trends in the EU: IPR enforcement case-law collection. EUIPO Publishing. Available at: https://www.euipo.europa.eu/en/publications/trade-secrets-litigation-trends-in-the-eu (Accessed: 3 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Farkas, T. and Koch, P. (2016) ‘The disclosure–fair trial dilemma when enforcing trade secrets in civil court proceedings’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 11(12), pp. 901–909. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpw153
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Federal Labour Court (Germany) (2024) Case No. 8 AZR 172/23. Judgement of the Eighth Senate, 17 October. Available at: https://openjur.de/u/2499874.html (Accessed: 29 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Fox, B. (2020) ‘Tripping over the EU Trade Secret Directive: “reasonable steps” to get back on track’, Chicago-Kent ǀ Journal of Intellectual Property, 19(1), pp. 68–92. Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/ckjip/vol19/iss1/11 (Accessed: 15 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Civil Code (Germany) 1896. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (BGB). Bundesgesetzblatt, consolidated text. Available at: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bgb/ (Accessed: 19 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Gougé, E. and Truchot-Bothner, A.C. (2019) ‘The Trade Secrets Directive—France’, Les Nouvelles – Journal of the Licensing Executives Society, 54(3), pp. 187–189. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3420351 (Accessed: 29 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Higher Regional Court of Düsseldorf (2021) Case No. 15 U 6/20. Judgement of the 15th Civil Senate, 11 March. Available at: https://openjur.de/u/2363217.html (Accessed: 18 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (2020) Case No. 2 U 575/19. Judgement of the Second Civil Senate, 19 November. Available at: https://openjur.de/u/2348225.html (Accessed: 29 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Hoeren, T. (2018) ‘The EU Directive on the protection of trade secrets and its relation to current provisions in Germany’, Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law, 9(2), pp. 138–145. Available at: https://www.jipitec.eu/jipitec/article/view/223 (Accessed: 22 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Hull, J. (2019) ‘Protecting trade secrets: how organisations can meet the challenge of taking “reasonable steps”’, WIPO Magazine, 1 October, pp. 35–39. Available at: https://www.wipo.int/en/web/wipo-magazine/articles/protecting-trade-secrets-how-organizations-can-meet-the-challenge-of-taking-reasonable-steps-41043 (Accessed: 18 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. ISO (2022) ISO/IEC 27001:2022: Information security, cybersecurity and privacy protection – Information security management systems – Requirements. International Organization for Standardization. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/27001 (Accessed: 30 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Labour Code (France) 1910. Code du travail. Légifrance, consolidated text. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006072050/ (Accessed: 17 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Law of 30 July 2018 on the protection of trade secrets (France) 2018. Loi n° 2018-670 du 30 juillet 2018 relative à la protection du secret des affaires. Légifrance. Available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jorf/id/JORFTEXT000037262111 (Accessed: 18 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Law of Obligations Act (Estonia) 2001. Võlaõigusseadus (VÕS). RT I, 11 November 2025, 16. Available at: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/111112025016 (Accessed: 30 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Law on the Protection of Trade Secrets (Germany) 2019. Gesetz zum Schutz von Geschäftsgeheimnissen (GeschGehG). Bundesgesetzblatt, consolidated text. Available at: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/geschgehg/BJNR046610019.html (Accessed: 19 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Menell, P.S., Lemley, M.A. and Merges, R.P. (2016) Intellectual property in the new technological age: 2016—Chapters 1 and 2, Stanford Public Law Working Paper, No. 2780190. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2780190
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Niebel, R., de Martinis, L. and Clark, B. (2018) ‘The EU Trade Secrets Directive: all change for trade secret protection in Europe?’ Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 13(6), pp. 445–457. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpx227
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Ohly, A. (2020) ‘Germany: the Trade Secrets Protection Act of 2019’, in J. Schovsbo, T. Minssen and T. Riis (eds) The harmonisation and protection of trade secrets in the EU. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 103–123. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788973342.00012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Peer, N. and Baram, G. (2026) ‘Blurred lines: the expanding role of the private sector in wartime cyber operations—the case of the Russia–Ukraine war’, Cyber Security: A Peer-Reviewed Journal, 9(3), pp. 239–254. Available at: https://doi.org/10.69554/PPXU2105
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Põld, L. (2025) ‘Patent disclosure vs technological security: balancing Western innovation protection in a geopolitical conflict’, International Comparative Jurisprudence, 11(1), pp. 32–46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.13165/j.icj.2025.11.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Rantasaari, K. (2023) ‘Patent litigation in Europe: intermediate fee shifting and the UPC’, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 18(9), pp. 642–654. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad063
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Regional Court of Munich I (2019) Case No. 7 O 3890/19. Order of 13 August. Available at: https://openjur.de/u/2275835.html (Accessed: 29 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Restriction of Unfair Competition and Protection of Business Secrets Act (Estonia) 2018. Ebaausa konkurentsi takistamise ja ärisaladuse kaitse seadus (EKTÄKS). RT I, 7 December 2018, 2. Available at: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/akt/107122018002 (Accessed: 30 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Riis, T. and Schovsbo, J. (2019) ‘To be and not to be an IPR—the protection of trade secrets in the EU’, European Intellectual Property Review, forthcoming. University of Copenhagen Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2019-71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3347705
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Rutiku, S. (2025) ‘Akadeemiline vabadus ja teadusjulgeolek on lahutamatud’ [Academic freedom and research security are inseparable], ERR, 23 November. Available at: https://www.err.ee/1609862760/siret-rutiku-akadeemilinevabadus-ja-teadusjulgeolek-on-lahutamatud (Accessed: 22 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Schröder, V. and Widera, P. (2021) ‘Obtaining evidence in patent litigation and trade secret protection—a tale of two poles’, GRUR International, 70(4), pp. 361–376. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa161
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Supreme Court of Estonia (2009) Case No. 3-1-1-46-09. Judgement of the Criminal Chamber, 8 June. Available at: https://www.riigikohus.ee/et/lahendid?asjaNr=3-1-1-46-09 (Accessed: 20 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Supreme Court of Estonia (2020a) Case No. 1-18-4590. Judgement of the Criminal Chamber, 15 May. Available at: https://www.riigikohus.ee/et/lahendid?asjaNr=1-18-4590/82 (Accessed: 20 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Supreme Court of Estonia (2020b) Case No. 2-19-9918. Judgement of the Civil Chamber, 21 October. Available at: https://www.riigikohus.ee/et/lahendid?asjaNr=2-19-9918/31 (Accessed: 20 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Unfair Competition Act (Germany) 2004. Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb (UWG). Bundesgesetzblatt, consolidated text. Available at: https://www.gesetzeim-internet.de/uwg_2004/BJNR141400004.html (Accessed: 19 December 2025).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Van Caenegem, W. (2013) Trade secrets and intellectual property: breach of confidence, misappropriation and unfair competition. Kluwer Law International. Available at: https://tind.wipo.int/record/27344 (Accessed: 23 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Van Dijk, N. (2017) ‘Legal theory: from intellectual property to informational goods’, in N. van Dijk (ed) Grounds of the immaterial: a conflict-based approach to intellectual rights. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 5–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786432506.00007
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Varadarajan, D. (2014) ‘Trade secret fair use’, Fordham Law Review, 83(3), pp. 1401–1454. Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol83/iss3/9 (Accessed: 3 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Värv, A. (2020) ‘Ärisaladuse kaitse uus nägu’ [The new face of trade secret protection], Juridica, 5, pp. 419–428.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Värv, A., Pisuke, H., Mets, T., E. Vasamäe and Kelli, A. (2010) ‘Trade secrets in the intellectual property strategies of entrepreneurs: the Estonian experience’, Review of Central and East European Law, 35(5), pp. 315–339. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/157303510X12650378240476
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Würtenberger, G. (2019) ‘Protection of trade secrets and know-how in the European Union: the EU Trade Secrets Directive (EU) 2016/943’, IP-Iurisdictio. Available at: https://ip-iurisdictio.org/protection-of-trade-secrets-and-know-how-in-the-european-union-the-eu-trade-secrets-directive-eu-2019-943/#_ftn23 (Accessed: 11 January 2026).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2026-0028 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 (formerly 2228-0596) | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600 (formerly 2228-0596)
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 354 - 378
Published online: Oct 25, 2026
Published in print: Dec 1, 2026
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
cybersecurity,
intellectual property law,
patent law,
technological innovation,
trade secrets
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Computer sciences, other,
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Law,
Law, other,
Social sciences,
Social sciences, other

© 2026 Lisette Põld, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 16 (2026): Issue 2 (December 2026)
Previous article
Next article