References
- Adams-Prassl, J., Binns, R. and Kelly-Lyth, A. (2023) ‘Directly discriminatory algorithms’, Modern Law Review, 86(1), pp. 144–175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12759
- AI HLEG (2019) Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. European Commission High-Level Expert Group on AI.
- Barocas, S. and Selbst, A.D. (2016) ‘Big data’s disparate impact’, California Law Review, 104(3), pp. 671–732. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2477899
- Bell, M. (2002) Anti-discrimination law and the European Union. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199244508.001.0001
- Binns, R. (2018) ‘Algorithmic accountability and public reason’, Philosophy & Technology, 31(4), pp. 543–556. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0263-5
- Burrell, J. (2016) ‘How the machine “thinks”: understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms’, Big Data & Society, 3(1), pp. 1–12. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512
- Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (2012) Official Journal C 326, pp. 391–407.
- Chouldechova, A. (2017) ‘Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments’, Big Data, 5(2), pp. 153–163. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1089/big.2016.0047
- Citron, D.K. and Pasquale, F. (2014) ‘The scored society: due process for automated predictions’, Washington Law Review, 89(1), pp. 1–33.
- Datta, A., Fredrikson, M., Ko, G., Mardziel, P. and Sen, S. (2017) ‘Proxy non-discrimination in data-driven systems: theory and experiments with machine learnt programs’, ArXiv. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3133956.3134097
- Ellis, E. and Watson, P. (2012) EU anti-discrimination law. 2nd edn. Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199698462.001.0001
- EquiTech project (no date) Improving response to risks of discrimination, bias and intolerance in automated decision-making systems to promote equality. European Commission, CERV-2023-EQUAL, Grant Agreement No. 101144709.
- Eubanks, V. (2018) Automating inequality: how high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. Picador, St Martin’s Press.
- Gerards, J. and Xenidis, R. (2021) Algorithmic discrimination in Europe: challenges and opportunities for gender equality and non-discrimination law. Publications Office of the European Union.
- Göksal, S.I., Solarte-Vasquez, M.C. and Chochia, A. (2024) ‘The EU AI Act’s alignment within the European Union’s regulatory framework on artificial intelligence’, International and Comparative Law Review, 24(2), pp. 25–53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2024-0017
- Hacker, P. (2018) ‘Teaching fairness to artificial intelligence: existing and novel strategies against algorithmic discrimination under EU law’, Common Market Law Review, 55(4), pp. 1143–1185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2018095
- Joamets, K. (2025) ‘Towards fair AI in Estonia’s public service: discussing and disseminating bias prevention in automated decision-making’, TalTech Journal of European Studies, 15(3), pp. 201–224. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2025-0037
- Kerikmäe, T. and Pärn-Lee, E. (2021) ‘Legal dilemmas of Estonian artificial intelligence strategy: in between of e-society and global race’, AI & Society, 36, pp. 561–572. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-01009-8
- Kerikmäe, T., Joamets, K. and Metin, E. (2025) ‘Automated decision-making in Estonia’s public sector: innovation, regulation, and challenges about non-discrimination’, in F. Decarolis, B. Marchetti and L. Torchia (eds) European digital regulation and its impact on Member States, European Union and its neighbours in a globalized world, 27, pp. 149–186. Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-06490-5_6
- Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S. and Raghavan, M. (2017) ‘Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores’, Proceedings of Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 1–23. Available at: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1609.05807
- Laux, J., Wachter, S. and Mittelstadt, B. (2024) ‘Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI Act: on the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk’, Regulation & Governance, 18(1), pp. 3–32. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12512
- Lips, S. and Joamets, K. (2025a) Educational material for data scientists, data protection specialists and developers. Project 101144709, EquiTech. Tallinn University of Technology. Unpublished training material.
- Lips, S. and Joamets, K. (2025b) Study material for public servants. Project 101144709, EquiTech. Tallinn University of Technology. Unpublished training material.
- Mittelstadt, B. (2016) ‘Automation, algorithms, and politics: auditing for transparency in content personalization systems’, International Journal of Communication, 10, pp. 4991–5002.
- O’Neil, C. (2016) Weapons of math destruction: how big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group.
- Pasquale, F. (2015) The black box society: the secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674736061
- Pilving, I. and Mikiver, M. (2020) ‘A Kratt as an administrative body: algorithmic decisions and principles of administrative law’, Juridica International, 29, pp. 47–61. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12697/JI.2020.29.05
- ‘Council regulation (EU) 2016/679 of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation)’ (2016) Official Journal L 119. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj (Accessed: 5 August 2026).
- ‘Council regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence and amending Regulations (EC) No. 300/2008, (EU) No. 167/2013, (EU) No. 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1139 and (EU) 2019/2144 and Directives 2014/90/EU, (EU) 2016/797 and (EU) 2020/1828 (Artificial Intelligence Act)’ (2024) Official Journal L 2024/1689. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj (Accessed: 5 August 2026).
- Selbst, A.D., Boyd, D., Friedler, S.A., Venkatasubramanian, S. and Vertesi, J. (2019) ‘Fairness and abstraction in sociotechnical systems’, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 59–68. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287598
- Smuha, N.A. (2021) ‘From a “race to AI” to a “race to AI regulation”: regulatory competition for artificial intelligence’, Law, Innovation and Technology, 13(1), pp. 57–84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1898300
- Wachter, S. (2020) ‘Affinity profiling and discrimination by association in online behavioural advertising’, Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 35(2), pp. 367–430. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3388639
- Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B. and Floridi, L. (2017) ‘Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation’, International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), pp. 76–99. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipx005
- Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B. and Russell, C. (2018) ‘Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: automated decisions and the GDPR’, Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(2), pp. 841–887. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3063289
- Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B. and Russell, C. (2021) ‘Why fairness cannot be automated: bridging the gap between EU non-discrimination law and AI’, Computer Law & Security Review, 41, article 105567. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105567
- Weerts, H., Xenidis, R., Tarissan, F., Palmer Olsen, H. and Pechenizkiy, M. (2023) ‘Algorithmic unfairness through the lens of EU non-discrimination law: or why the law is not a decision tree’, Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 805–816. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/3593013.3594044
- Zolkin, V., Chochia, A. and Hoffmann, T. (2023) ‘Automated decision-making in the EU Member State’s public administration: the compliance of automated decisions of the Estonian Unemployment Insurance Fund with Estonian administrative procedure law’, European Studies: The Review of European Law, Economics and Politics, 10(2), pp. 178–202. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/eustu-2023-0017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2026-0025 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 (formerly 2228-0596) | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600 (formerly 2228-0596)
Language: English
Page range: 291 - 310
Published online: Oct 25, 2026
Published in print: Dec 1, 2026
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Archil Chochia, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.