References
- Abbott, F.M. and Reichman, J.H. (2020) ‘Facilitating access to cross-border supplies of patented pharmaceuticals: the case of the COVID-19 pandemic’, Journal of International Economic Law, 23(3), pp. 535–561. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgaa022
- Adcock, M. and Beyleveld, D. (2016) ‘Morality in intellectual property law: a concept-theoretic framework’, Intellectual Property Rights, 4, p. 154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4516.1000154
- Carbone, J. (2003) ‘Ethics, patents and the sustainability of the biotech business model’, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 17(2), pp. 203–218. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1360086032000125012
- Chochia, A. and Sicat, E.G.N. (2023) ‘Ethics and modern technologies: example of navigating children’s rights in an AI-powered learning environment’, in D.R. Troitiño, T. Kerikmäe and O. Hamuľák (eds) Digital development of the European Union. Cham: Springer, pp. 129–141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27312-4_9
- Drahos, P. (2011) ‘Patents, practical ethics and scientists’, Prometheus, 29(3), pp. 345–352. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2011.631274
- Dutt, P., Ferraro, S., Chochia, A. and Muljar, R. (2018) ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to understand differences between countries: the case of Estonia and Finland’, Baltic Journal of European Studies, 8(1), pp. 123–153. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2018-0008
- Dutt, P.K., Nyman-Metcalf, K. and Kerikmäe, T. (2021) ‘A review of different theoretical approaches towards sustainable development goals in the area of research, development and innovation’, Retfærd, 44(167), pp. 89–109.
- Dutt, P.K., Wahl, M.F. and Kerikmäe, T. (2019) ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to understand differences between countries—the case of Estonia and Germany’, International and Comparative Law Review, 19(1), pp. 190–233. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0007
- European Commission (no date) A European strategy for data. Digital strategy. Available at: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/strategy-data (Accessed: 21 February 2025).
- Feeney, O., Cockbain, J. and Sterckx, S. (2021) ‘Ethics, patents, and genome editing: a critical assessment of three options of technology governance’, Frontiers in Political Science, 3, article 731505. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.731505
- Ferraro, S., Dutt, P.K. and Kerikmäe, T. (2017) ‘Using patent development, education policy and research and development expenditure policy to increase technological competitiveness of small European Union Member States’, Croatian International Relations Review, 23(78), pp. 97–126. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/cirr-2017-0009
- Forsberg, E.M., Hanssen, A.B., Nielsen, H.M. and Olesen, I. (2018) ‘Patent ethics: the misalignment of views between the patent system and the wider society’, Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), pp. 1551–1576. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9956-5
- Geiger, C. and Machado Pontes, L. (2017) ‘Trade mark registration, public policy, morality and fundamental rights’, in 20 years of the Boards of Appeal at EUIPO: anniversary book, celebrating the past, looking forward to the future. Alicante: EUIPO, pp. 96–113. Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies (CEIPI) Research Paper No 2017-01. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3009170
- Groen, A.J., De Weerd–Nederhof, P.C., Kerssens–van Drongelen, I.C., Badoux, R.A. and Olthuis, G.P. (2002) ‘Creating and justifying research and development value: scope, scale, skill and social networking of R&D’, Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), pp. 2–16. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00232
- Göksal, S.I., Solarte-Vasquez, M.C. and Chochia, A. (2024) ‘The EU AI Act’s alignment within the European Union’s regulatory framework on artificial intelligence’, International and Comparative Law Review, 24(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2024-0017
- Hoffmann, T. (2020) ‘Heuristics in legal decision-making’, Acta Baltica Historiae et Philosophiae Scientiarum, 8(1), pp. 62–71. Available at: https://doi.org/10.11590/abhps.2020.1.03
- Hoffmann, T. and Prause, G. (2015) ‘How to keep open-source based innovation approaches sustainable: a view from the intellectual property law perspective’, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 2(3), pp. 133–141. Available at: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2014.2.3(2)
- Kanwar, S. and Evenson, R. (2003) ‘Does intellectual property protection spur technological change?’, Oxford Economic Papers, 55(2), pp. 235–264. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/55.2.235
- Lever, A. (2008) ‘Is it ethical to patent human genes?’, in A. Gosseries, A. Marciano and A. Strowel (eds) Intellectual property and theories of justice. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 246–264. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-58239-2_13
- Locke, J. (1690) The second treatise of civil government. Available at: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/7370/7370-h/7370-h.htm (Accessed: 21 February 2025).
- McMahon, A. (2021) ‘Patents, governance and control: ethics and the patentability of novel beings and advanced biotechnologies in Europe’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 30(3), pp. 529–542. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180120001073
- OECD (2015) Frascati Manual 2015: guidelines for collecting and reporting data on research and experimental development, the measurement of scientific, technological and innovation activities. Paris: OECD Publishing.
- Parsons, T. (1964) The social system. New York: Free Press/Macmillan.
- Rawls, J. (1971) A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674042605
- Ray, T.T. (1996) ‘Differentiating the related concepts of ethics, morality, law, and justice’, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996(66), pp. 47–53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.37219966609
- ‘Regulation (EU) 2022/868 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2022 on European data governance and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 (Data Governance Act)’ (2022) Official Journal L 152, 3.6.2022. Available at: http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2022/868/oj (Accessed: 21 February 2025).
- Sonderholm, J. (2010) ‘Ethical issues surrounding intellectual property rights’, Philosophy Compass, 5, pp. 1107–1115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00358.x
- Stiglitz, J.E. and Greenwald, B.C. (2014) Creating a learning society: a new approach to growth, development, and social progress. New York: Columbia University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7312/stig15214
- Tropp, E.-M., Hoffmann, T. and Chochia, A. (2022) ‘Open data: a stepchild in e-Estonia’s data management strategy?’, TalTech Journal of European Studies, 12(1), pp. 123–144. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2022-0006
- Turillazzi, A., Taddeo, M., Floridi, L. and Casolari, F. (2023) ‘The Digital Services Act: an analysis of its ethical, legal, and social implications’, Law, Innovation and Technology, 15(1), pp. 83–106. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2023.2184136
- Tvedt, M.W. and Forsberg, E.-M. (2017) ‘The room for ethical considerations in patent law applied to biotechnology’, The Journal of World Intellectual Property, 20(5–6), pp. 160–177. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12087
- UNDP (no date) Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Development Programme. Available at: https://www.undp.org/sustainable-development-goals (Accessed: 21 February 2025).