References
- ‘AWG Group v The Argentine Republic’ (2010) UNCITRAL, Decision on Liability. ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 30 July.
- Baetens, F. (ed) (2013) Investment law within international law – integrationist perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139855921
- ‘Bear Creek Mining Corporation v Republic of Peru’ (2017) ICSID Case No. ARB/14/21, Award. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 30 November.
- Brew, R. (2019) ‘Exception clauses in international investment agreements as a tool for appropriately balancing the right to regulate with investment protection’, Canterbury Law Review, 25, pp. 205–242.
- Calamita, J.N. (2013) ‘International human rights and the interpretation of international investment treaties: constitutional considerations’, in F. Baetens (ed) Investment law within international law – integrationist perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–184. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139855921.011
- Chauvel, L.M. (2017) ‘The influence of general exceptions on the interpretation of national treatment in international investment law’, Brazilian Journal of International Law, 14(2), pp. 140–142. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi/bjil.v14i2.4670
- ‘Chemtura Corporation v Government of Canada’ (2010) UNCITRAL Award. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 2 August.
- Chi, M. (2018) Integrating sustainable development in international investment law: normative incompatibility, system integration and governance implications. Abingdon: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315642840
- ‘CMS Gas Transmission Company v The Argentine Republic’ (2005) ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Award. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 12 May.
- ‘CMS Gas Transmission Company v The Argentine Republic’ (2007) ICSID Case No. ARB/01/8, Decision on Annulment. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 17 July.
- Coleman, J., Johnson, L., Sachs, L. and Gupta, K. (2018) ‘International investment agreements 2015–2016: a review of trends and new approaches’, in L. E. Sachs and L. Johnson (eds) 2015–2016 yearbook on international investment law and policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 42–108.
- ‘Continental Casualty v The Argentine Republic’ (2008) ICSID Case No. ARB/03/9 Award, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 5 September.
- ‘Copper Mesa Mining Corporation v The Republic of Ecuador’ (2016) PCA Case No. 2012-2 Award. Permanent Court for Arbitration, 15 March.
- ‘Council Decision (EU) 2019/1096 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Investment Protection Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, of the other part’ (2019) Official Journal L 175, 28 June.
- ‘Electrabel S.A. v Republic of Hungary’ (2015) ICSID Case No. ARB/07/19, Award. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 25 November.
- Eliasson, L.J. (2015) ‘International standards: past free trade agreements and the prospects in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership’, Baltic Journal of European Studies, 5(1), pp. 5–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2015-0002
- ‘Enron Corporation and Ponderosa Assents v The Argentine Republic’ (2007) ICSID Case No. ARB/01/3, Award. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 22 May.
- European Commission (2025a) Multilateral Investment Court project. Available at: https://policy.trade.ec.europa.eu/enforcement-and-protection/multilateral-investment-court-project_en (Accessed: 5 April 2025).
- European Commission (2025b) Guide to Investment Court System. Available at: https://trade.ec.europa.eu/access-to-markets/en/content/guide-investment-court-system (Accessed: 5 April 2025).
- General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) (1994) World Trade Organization, 15 April.
- Ha, T.T.B. (2022) ‘Vietnam’s commitments under the European Union—Vietnam Investment Protection Agreement (EVIPA): some noteworthy points’, Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences, 6(1), pp. 1–18. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjls-2022-0001
- Henckels, C. (2012) ‘Indirect expropriation and the right to regulate: revisiting proportionality analysis and the standard of review in investor-state arbitration’, Journal of International Economic Law, 15(1), pp. 223–255. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgs012
- Henckels, C. (2016) ‘Protecting regulatory autonomy through greater precision in investment treaties: the TPP, CETA, and TTIP’, Journal of International Economic Law, 19(1), pp. 27–50. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgw001
- Henckels, C. (2018a) ‘Should investment treaties contain public policy exceptions?’ Boston College Law Review, 59(8), pp. 2825–2844. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3209902
- Henckels, C. (2018b) ‘Balancing test: investment arbitration’, Max Planck Encyclopedias of International Law. Available at: https://opil.ouplaw.com/display/10.1093/law-mpeipro/e3420.013.3420/law-mpeipro-e3420?prd=MPIL (Accessed: 7 January 2025).
- Hush, E. (2018) ‘Where no man has gone before: the future of sustainable development in the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement and new generation free trade agreements’, Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 43(1), pp. 93–148. Available at: https://doi.org/10.7916/cjel.v43i1.3741
- ‘Impregilo S.p.A. v The Argentine Republic’ (2011) ICSID Case No. ARB/07/17, Award. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 21 June.
- Investment Protection Agreement between the EU and its Member States, of the One Part, and the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam, of the Other Part (2019) Official Journal L 175, 28 June. Available at: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/documents/treaties-agreements/agreement/?id=2019015&DocLanguage=en (Accessed: 5 April 2025).
- Kim, J. (2018) ‘Balancing regulatory interests through an exceptions framework under the right to regulate provision in international investment agreements’, The George Washington International Law Review, 50(2), pp. 289–355.
- Kawharu, A. (2015) ‘TPPA: Chapter 9 on investment’, Expert Paper No. 2, TPP Legal. Available at: https://tpplegal.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/ep2-amokurakawharu.pdf (Accessed: 7 January 2025).
- Korzun, V. (2017) ‘The right to regulate in investor-state arbitration: slicing and dicing regulatory carve-outs’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 50(2), pp. 355–407.
- Levashova, Y. (2019) The right of states to regulate in international investment law: the search for balance between public interest and fair and equitable treatment. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.
- ‘LG&E Energy Corp., LG&E Capital Corp. and LG&E International, Inc. v The Argentine Republic’ (2006) ICSID Case No. ARB/02/1, Decision on Liability. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 25 July.
- Martini, C. (2017) ‘Balancing investors’ rights with environmental protection in international investment arbitration: an assessment of recent trends in investment treaty drafting’, The International Lawyer, 50(3), pp. 529–547.
- Nguyen, A.T. et al. (2022) FDI của EU vào Việt Nam trong bối cảnh thực thi EVFTA và EVIPA (FDI flows from the EU to Vietnam in the context of EVFTA and EVIPA). Report. Available at: https://www.kas.de/en/web/vietnam/single-title/-/content/fdi-flows-from-the-eu-to-vietnam-in-the-context-of-evfta-and-evipa (Accessed: 24 February 2025).
- Nguyen, T.L.H. (2022) ‘The inclusion of sustainable development into new-generation FTAs—what can be expected in reserving nations’ rights to regulate?’ Vietnamese Journal of Legal Sciences, 7(2), pp. 73–100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2478/vjls-2022-0009
- ‘Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Occidental Exploration and Production Company v The Republic of Ecuador II’ (2012) ICSID Case No. ARB/06/11, Award. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 5 October.
- Ortino, F. (2016) ‘Defining indirect expropriation: the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the (elusive) search for “greater certainty”’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 43(4), pp. 351–365. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2016019
- Paparinskis, M. (2015) ‘International investment law and the European Union: a reply to Catharine Titi’, European Journal of International Law, 26(3), pp. 663–670. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chv041
- ‘Philip Morris Brands Sàrl, Philip Morris Products S.A. and Abal Hermanos S.A. v Oriental Republic of Uruguay’ (2016) ICSID Case No. ARB/10/7, Award. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 8 July.
- ‘PL Holdings Sàrl v Republic of Poland’ (2017) SCC Case No. V2014/163, Partial Award. Swedish Supreme Court, 28 June.
- ‘Saluka Investments B.V. v The Czech Republic’ (2006) UNCITRAL, Partial Award. United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, 17 March.
- ‘Sempra Energy International v The Argentine Republic’ (2007) ICSID Case No. ARB/02/16, Award. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 28 September.
- ‘SGS Société Générale de Surveillance S.A. v Republic of the Philippines’ (2004) ICSID Case No. ARB/02/6, Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 29 January.
- ‘Siemens A.G. v The Argentine Republic’ (2004) ICSID Case No. ARB/02/8, Decision on Jurisdiction. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 3 August.
- SNBT (2015) “The right to regulate” in the trade agreement between the EU and Canada—and its implications for the agreement with the USA. Stockholm: Swedish National Board of Trade.
- ‘Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed, S.A. v The United Mexican States’ (2003) ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/00/2, Award. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 29 May.
- Titi, A. (2018) ‘Refining the expropriation clause: what role for proportionality?’, in J. Chaisse (ed) China–European Union investment relationships: towards a new leadership in global investment governance? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 111–113. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788971904.00015
- Tran, H.T.L. (2024) ‘Commercial arbitration in Asia: legal developments and regional dynamics from an ASEAN perspective’, Asia Pacific Law Review, pp. 1–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10192557.2024.2445627
- Tran, V.D. (2019) ‘Vietnam’s experiences with international investment agreements governance: issues and solutions’, in Asian Yearbook of International Law, 25, pp. 84–104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004501249_005
- Tran, V.D. and Ngo, N.T.V. (2017) ‘The settlement practice of environmental disputes involving foreign investors in Vietnam—the two sides of the FDI coin’, in Asian Yearbook of International Law, 23, pp. 137–172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004415829_010
- Trujillo, E. (2018) ‘Balancing sustainability, the right to regulate, and the need for investor protection: lessons from the trade regime’, Boston College Law Review, 59(8), pp. 2735–2765.
- UNCITRAL Working Group III (2024) Standing mechanism—annotated comments. Available at: https://circabc.europa.eu/ui/group/7fc51410-46a1-4871-8979-20cce8df0896/library/61f3e4bc-f692-4c29-b1a1-14ebd8e211d7/details?download=true (Accessed: 5 April 2025).
- UNCTAD (2017) World investment report 2017: investment and the digital economy. Available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/wir2017_en.pdf (Accessed: 5 April 2025).
- UNCTAD (2025) Investment policy hub. Available at: https://investmentpolicy.unctad.org/investment-dispute-settlement/country/229/viet-nam (Accessed: 5 April 2025).
- ‘Urbaser S.A. and Consorcio de Aguas Bilbao Bizkaia, Bilbao Biskaia Ur Partzuergoa v. The Argentine Republic’ (2016) ICSID Case No. ARB/07/26, Award. International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, 8 December.
- Vanduzer, J.A., Simons, P. and Maeda, G. (2013) Integrating sustainable development into international investment agreements: a guide for developing country negotiators. London: Commonwealth Secretariat. Available at: https://doi.org/10.14217/9781848591424-en
- Vinh Tho, D.L. (2025) ‘Belgium to strengthen all-round ties with Vietnam, ratify EVIPA: King Philippe’, Tuoi Tre News, 2 April. Available at: https://tuoitrenews.vn/news/politics/20250402/belgium-to-strengthen-allround-ties-with-vietnam-ratify-evipa-king-philippe/85705.html (Accessed: 5 April 2025).
- Zarra, G. (2017) ‘Right to regulate, margin of appreciation and proportionality: current status in investment arbitration in light of Philip Morris v. Uruguay’, Brazilian Journal of International Law, 14(2), pp. 95–115. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v14i2.4624