References
- Aarnio, A. (1987) The rational as reasonable. A treatise on legal justification. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
- Alhanen, K. (2016) Dialogi demokratiassa. Turenki: Gaudeamus.
- Berger-Walliser, G. (2012) ‘The past and future of proactive law: an overview of the proactive law movement’, in G. Berger-Walliser and K. Østergaard (eds) Proactive law in a business environment. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, pp. 13–31. Available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2576761 (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
- Berger-Walliser, G., Barton, T.D. and Haapio, H. (2017) ‘From visualization to legal design: a collaborative and creative process’, American Business Law Journal, 54(2), pp. 347–392. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/ablj.12101
- Berger-Walliser, G., Shrivastava, P. and Sulkowski, A. (2016) ‘Using proactive legal strategies for corporate environmental sustainability’, Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law, 6(1), pp. 1–27. Available at: https://doi.org/10.36640/mjeal.6.1.using
- Buchanan, R. (2019) ‘Systems thinking and design thinking: the search for principles in the world we are making’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 5(2), pp. 85–104. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.04.001
- Capra, F. and Luisi, P.L. (2014) The systems view of life: a unifying vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511895555
- Doherty, M., Corrales Compagnucci, M., Haapio, H. and Hagan, M. (2021) ‘A new attitude to law’s empire: the potentialities of legal design’, in M. Corrales Compagnucci, H. Haapio, M. Hagan and M. Doherty (eds) Legal design, integrating business, design and legal thinking with technology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 1–8. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781839107269.00008
- Edson, M., Tuddenham, P. and Buckle-Henning, P. (2016) ‘Systems research: a foundation for systems literacy’, Proceedings of the 2016 IFSR Conversation Team 3: Systems Research Team.
- European Economic and Social Committee (2009) ‘Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on ‘The proactive law approach: a further step towards better regulation at EU level’’ (2009) Official Journal C 175/26, 28 July. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2009:175:0026:0033:EN:PDF (Accessed: 13 November 2024).
- Haapio, H. (2006) ‘Introduction to proactive law: a business lawyer’s view’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 22–34. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-2.pdf (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
- Hämäläinen, R.P., Jones, R. and Saarinen, E. (2014) Being better better. Living with systems intelligence. Aalto University Publications.
- Hämäläinen, R.P., Kumpulainen, K.R., Harviainen, T. and Saarinen, E. (2020) ‘Design gaming for learning systems intelligence in socio-emotional systems’, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 39(1), pp. 163–167. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2750
- Hämäläinen, R.P. and Saarinen, E. (2004) Systems intelligence: discovering a hidden competence in human action and organizational life. Helsinki: Helsinki University of Technology.
- Hämäläinen, R.P. and Saarinen, E. (2006) ‘Systems intelligence: a key competence for organizational life’, Reflections: The SoL Journal, 7(4), pp. 191–201. Available at: https://www.solonline.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/sol_reflections_7.4.pdf (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
- Hämäläinen, R.P., Saarinen, E. and Törmänen, J. (2019) ‘Systems intelligence—a core competence for next-generation engineers?’, in M. Lee, S. Nikolic, G. Wong, J. Shen, M. Ros, L. Lei and N. Venkatarayalu (eds) Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE), Wollongong, NSW, Australia, pp. 641–644. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE.2018.8615247
- Hart, H.L.A. (1994) The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Hietanen-Kunwald, P., Haapio, H. and Toivonen, N. (2021) ‘Systems theory as a research framework for dispute prevention and resolution by design’, in R. Ducato and A. Strowel (eds) Legal design perspectives: theoretical and practical insights from the field. Milan: Ledizioni, pp. 71–90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5710846
- Ishikawa, K. and Loftus, J.H. (1990) Introduction to quality control, 98, p. 31. Tokyo: 3A Corporation.
- Johnston, C.M. (2021) Creative systems theory. The Institute for Creative Development.
- Jumisko-Pyykkö, S., Törmänen, J., Vänni, K., Hämäläinen, R.P. and Saarinen E. (2022) ‘Systems intelligence, perceived performance and wellbeing’, Human Factors, Business Management and Society, 56, pp. 55–63. Available at: https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002252
- Kelsen, H. (1989) Pure theory of law. Gloucester: Peter Smith.
- Kjaer, P.F. (2022) ‘What is transformative law?’, European Law Open, 1(4), pp. 760–780. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4420959
- LoPucki, L. (1997) ‘Systems approach to law’, Cornell Law Review, 82, pp. 479–522. Available at: https://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol82/iss3/1 (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
- Luhmann, N. (1989) Ecological communication. Cambridge: The University of Chicago Press.
- Luhmann, N. (2004) Law as a social system. Translated by K.A. Ziegert. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198262381.001.0001
- MacLoud, E. (2024) ‘The power of stories to unite, inspire, and collectively imagine new futures’, in R. Ducato, A. Strowel and E. Marique (eds) Design(s) for law. Milan: Ledizioni, pp. 115–140.
- Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1998) The tree of knowledge. The biological roots of human understanding. Revised edn. Shambhala Publications.
- Meadows, D. (2008) Thinking in systems. A primer. Edited by D. Wright. Vermont: Chelsea Green Publishing.
- Midgley, G. (2000) Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology and practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4201-8
- Mobus, G.E. and Kalton, M.C. (2015) Principles of systems science. Springer. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-1920-8
- Murray, J., Webb, T.E. and Wheatley, S. (2019) ‘Encountering law’s complexity’, in J. Murray, T.E. Webb and S. Wheatley (eds) Complexity theory and law. Mapping an emergent jurisprudence. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158976-1
- Nedelsky, J. (2011) Law’s relations. A relational theory of self, autonomy, and law. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195147964.001.0001
- OECD (2021) OECD framework and good practice principles for people-centered justice. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1787/cdc3bde7-en
- Pierson-Brown, T. (2020) ‘(Systems) thinking like a lawyer’, Clinical Law Review, 26, pp. 515–562. Available at: https://scholarship.law.pitt.edu/fac_articles/219 (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
- Pirie, F. (2013) The anthropology of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199696840.001.0001
- Pohjonen, S. (2006) ‘Proactive law in the field of law’, in P. Wahlgren (ed) A proactive approach. Scandinavian studies in law, 49. Stockholm: Stockholm Institute for Scandinavian Law, pp. 53–70. Available at: https://www.scandinavianlaw.se/pdf/49-4.pdf (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
- Pohjonen, S. and Koskelainen, K. (2012) ‘Empowering contracting parties: proactive and dialogic contracting in public procurement’, in G. Berger-Walliser and K. Østergaard (eds) Proactive law in a business environment. Copenhagen: DJØF Publishing, pp. 267–303.
- Pronin, E. (2008) ‘How we see ourselves and how we see others’, Science, 320(5880), pp. 1177–1180. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1154199
- Raz, J. (1979) The authority of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ross, V. and de Almeida, L. (2024) ‘Refining reflexive environmental law by nature and nurture: autonomy, accountability, and adjustability’, Transnational Environmental Law, 13(2), pp. 428–452. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102524000037
- Ruhl, J.B. and Katz, D.M. (2019) ‘Mapping law’s complexity with “legal maps”’, in J. Murray, T.E. Webb and S. Wheatley (eds) Complexity theory and law. Mapping an emergent jurisprudence. London: Routledge. Available at: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315158976-2
- Saffo, P. (1999) ‘Preface. The business world turned upside down’, in J.H. Clippinger (ed) The biology of business. Decoding the natural laws of enterprise. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, pp. xvii–xix.
- Salmi-Tolonen, T. (2008) ‘A multidimensional topic requires a multidisciplinary approach’, in S. Nysten-Haarala (ed) Corporate contracting capabilities. Conference proceedings and other writings. University of Joensuu, Publications in Law, pp. 1–17.
- Senge, P.M. (2006) The fifth discipline. The art & practice of the learning organization. Revised and updated edn. London: Random House.
- Teubner, G. (1983) ‘Substantive and reflexive elements in modern law’, Law and Society Review, 17(2), pp. 239–285. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053348
- Teubner, G. (1992) Law as an autopoietic system. Translated by A. Bankowski and R. Adler, edited by Z. Bankowski. Oxford: Blackwell.
- The Systems Intelligence Research Group (no date) Systems intelligence self-evaluation. Available at: https://systemsintelligence.net/sitest/en/ (Accessed: 12 September 2024).
- Toivonen, N. and de Francisco Vela, S. (2024) ‘Exploring the dimensions of participation in legal design’, in R. Ducato, A. Strowel and E. Marique (eds) Design(s) for law. Milan: Ledizioni, pp. 253–282.
- Tuori, K. (2002) Critical legal positivism. Abingdon: Routledge.
- Von Bertalanffy, L. (1968) General system theory. New York: George Braziller.
- Wiener, N. (1954) The human use of human beings. Cybernetics and society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
- Zamir, E. and Teichman, D. (2018) Behavioral law and economics. New York: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190901349.001.0001