Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Data Protection Under Review of Constitutional Court: Administrative Databases Directly Accessible to Public Authorities Cover

Data Protection Under Review of Constitutional Court: Administrative Databases Directly Accessible to Public Authorities

TalTech Journal of European Studies
Volume 14 (2024): Issue 2 (December 2024)
By: Aleksandrs Potaičuks  
Open Access
|Nov 2024

References

  1. Aycaguer v. France [2017], ECtHR Application no. 8806/12, 22.6.2017. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175007 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Bar-Siman-Tov, I. (2012), ‘Semiprocedural Judicial Review,’ Legisprudence, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 271–300. https://doi.org/10.5235/17521467.6.3.271
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Lecce v. Salvatore Manni [2017], CJEU Case C-398/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:197, 9.3.2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Catt v. The United Kingdom [2013], ECtHR Application no. 43514/15, 24.1.2019. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-189424 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, OJ C 326, 26.10.2012.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Christine Goodwin v. The United Kingdom [2002], ECtHR Application no. 28957/95, 11.7. 2002. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-65153 [accessed Aug 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Ciubotaru v. Moldova [2010], ECtHR Application no. 27138/04, 17.4.2010. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-98445 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Constitutional Court of Latvia, Case no. 2018-18-01 of November 13, 2021, Latvijas Vēstnesis 223, 16.11.2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Constitutional Court of Latvia, Case no. 2022-09-01 of December 22, 2022, Latvijas Vēstnesis 250, 27.12.2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 ‘On the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of Such Data,’ OJ L 281, 23.11.1995.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Gardel v. France [2009], ECtHR Application no. 16428/05, 17.12.2009. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96457 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Gaughran v. The United Kingdom [2020], ECtHR Application no. 45245/15, 13.2.2020. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200817 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Hofmann, H.; Schneider, J. P. & Ziller, J., eds. (2014), ReNEUAL Model Rules on EU Administrative Procedure, ReNEUAL Research Network on EU Administrative Law.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Latvijas Republikas Saeima (Points de pénalité) [2021], CJEU Case C-439/19, ECLI:EU:C:2021:504, 22.6.2021.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Law on Road Traffic, Latvijas Vēstnesis 274/276, 1.10.1997.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Law on State Information Systems, Latvijas Vēstnesis 76, 2.5.2002.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Ligue des droits humains ASBL v. Conseil des ministres [2022], CJEU Case C-817/19, ECLI:EU:C:2022:491, 21.6.2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Michael Schwarz v. Stadt Bochum [2013], CJEU Case C-291/12, ECLI:EU:C:2013:670, 17.10.2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. M.K. v. France [2013], ECtHR Application no. 19522/09, 18.4.2013. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-119075 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. M.M. v. the United Kingdom [2012], ECtHR Application no. 24029/07, 13.11.2012. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-114517 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. OT v. Vyriausioji tarnybinės etikos komisija [2022], CJEU Case C-184/20, ECLI:EU:C:2022:601, 1.8.2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Peter Puškár v. Finančné riaditeľstvo Slovenskej republiky and Kriminálny úrad finančnej správy [2017], CJEU Case C-73/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:725, 27.9.2017.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Pleps, J.; Pastars, E. & Plakane, I. (2022), Constitutional Law, Rīga: Latvijas Vēstnesis. Retrieved from https://juristavards.lv/wwwraksti/JV/BIBLIOTEKA/GRAMATAS/KT_ENG.PDF [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Punishment Register Law, Latvijas Vēstnesis 211, 10.10.2013.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016, OJ L 119/1, 4.5.2016.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. S. and Marper v. the United Kingdom [2008], ECtHR Application no. 30562/04, 4.12.2008. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/fre?i=001-90051 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Sarat, A.; Douglas, L. & Umphrey, M. M., eds. (2012), Imagining New Legalities: Privacy and Its Possibilities in the 21st Century, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v. Sweden [2006], ECtHR Application no. 62332/00, 6.6.2006. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-75591 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Shimovolos v. Russia [2011], European Court of Human Rights Application no. 30194/09, 21.6.2011 (28.11.2011 final). Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105217 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Sínan Işık v. Turkey [2010], ECtHR Application no. 21924/05, 2.2. 2010. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97087 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Smaranda Bara and Others v. Casa Naţională de Asigurări de Sănătate and Others [2015], CJEU Case C-201/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:638, 1.10.2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. SO v. Nationale Anti-Doping Agentur Austria GmbH (NADA) and Others [2023], CJEU Case C-115/22, ECLI:EU:C:2023:676, 14.9.2023.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Sõro v. Estonia [2015], ECtHR Application no. 22588/08, 3.9.2015. Retrieved from https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156518 [accessed 29 May 2024]
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Volker und Markus Schecke GbR (C-92/09) and Hartmut Eifert (C-93/09) v. Land Hessen [2010], CJEU Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09, ECLI:EU:C:2010:662, 9.11.2010.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. WM and Sovim SA v. Luxembourg Business Registers [2022], CJEU Joined Cases C-37/20 and C-601/20, ECLI:EU:C:2022:912, 22.11.2022.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. W. P. Willems and Others v. Burgemeester van Nuth and Others [2015], CJEU Case C-446/12, ECLI:EU:C:2015:238, 16.4.2015.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/bjes-2024-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2674-4619 | Journal ISSN: 2674-4600
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 87
Published on: Nov 28, 2024
Published by: Tallinn University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
constitutional law,
databases,
data protection,
privacy,
proportionality of state measures,
ReNEUAL model rules
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Computer sciences, other,
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Law,
Law, other,
Social sciences,
Social sciences, other

© 2024 Aleksandrs Potaičuks, published by Tallinn University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2024): Issue 2 (December 2024)Next article